- 91 Posts
- 135 Comments
-
Genocide refers to the deliberate destruction of a group based on its identity, as defined by Raphael Lemkin, who introduced the term after witnessing the horrors of Nazi atrocities. The term was legally recognized in 1946 by the United Nations. Genocide includes actions such as killing, causing harm, and inflicting conditions that destroy a group. Israel’s military actions in Gaza are not aimed at destroying the Palestinian population but targeting Hamas, a terrorist organization. Statements from Israeli officials and military practices reinforce that Israel does not intend to harm innocent civilians in Gaza.
-
Israel’s military response in Gaza is aimed at Hamas, not the Palestinian population, which is not genocide but a defense against a terrorist group that seeks Israel’s destruction. Hamas’s actions represent genocidal intent, targeting Israeli civilians and propagating hatred against Jews. Israel’s actions are consistent with international law, focusing on eliminating Hamas and its military infrastructure in Gaza. The use of significant military force is justified, given Hamas’s attacks on Israel. These actions are not genocide, as they are in direct response to a genocidal attack by Hamas.
-
Israel’s military efforts are designed to minimize harm to Palestinian civilians, with the IDF issuing warnings before strikes and setting up humanitarian corridors. Despite challenges, Israel’s focus is on protecting civilians by evacuating them from battle zones and providing aid. The actions reflect Israel’s desire to protect civilians from harm while addressing the threat posed by Hamas. Claims of genocidal intent are contradicted by Israel’s humanitarian efforts in Gaza. The goal is to remove civilians from harm’s way while dismantling Hamas’s infrastructure.
-
Hamas deliberately places Palestinian civilians in harm’s way to use them as human shields and to manipulate public opinion by inflating civilian casualties. It fires missiles from civilian areas, turning them into legitimate military targets. While Israel aims to avoid civilian harm, it cannot entirely eliminate the risk due to Hamas’s tactics. The responsibility for civilian casualties lies with Hamas, which exacerbates the situation by using civilian sites to shield its operations. Israel’s military actions, while tragic, are legally justified in targeting legitimate military objectives.
-
Claims of genocide by Israel in Gaza are based on misunderstandings and unverified information. The true circumstances surrounding civilian casualties are unclear due to Hamas’s control of Gaza’s health ministry and its influence on casualty reporting. The real causes of civilian deaths, including whether they were caused by Hamas’s actions or Israeli strikes, are often unclear. Claims of genocide are fueled by misinformation, and the real blame for civilian suffering should lie with Hamas. Efforts to end the suffering in Gaza would be better focused on defeating Hamas, ensuring peace for both Palestinians and Israelis.
-
fun fact: Nooristan wasn’t even part of Afghanistan until they violently attacked Bilor (now called nooristan), a region that practiced ancient Hinduism, and forcibly converted its people to Islam!
for more reading
citation for violence
57% of American Muslims said Hamas’ Oct 7 terrorist attack against Israel was “justified”
my main points are:
Islam is not a religion of peace. It is a political and judicial system with violent laws (Sharia) and an explicit manual of war and domination (Jihad). Yes, the future is not good, integration has failed. Trend: younger generations of Muslims in the West become more radicalized.
Pew Research: “Younger Muslim Americans are both much more religiously observant and more accepting of Islamic extremism than are older Muslim Americans… A pattern of greater acceptance of suicide bombing among young Muslim Americans corresponds with the Pew Global Attitude Project’s findings among Muslims in Great Britain, France, Germany and Spain” For example: 42% of young Muslims in France believe there are situations in which suicide bombings are justified. https://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/old-assets/pdf/muslim-americans.pdf Yes, leftists advocate for Islam, they are TRAITORS of progressive values, so real progressives must stand against them. Salman Rushdie: The Western left has been an accomplice of violent forms of Islam, by covering up and even promoting religious fundamentalism. Leftists are taking up a role that used to belong to the far-right. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxLjFi92FS4&feature=youtu.be
LGBTs, feminists, atheists, progressives… feel betrayed by the left, which denies the increase in homophobic attacks, waves of rapes by immigrants, a bleak future… Instead, the left gives citizenship and political rights to millions of non-integrated Muslims, putting fundamental minority rights at risk… In that context, the phenomenon of “homonationalism” https://academic.oup.com/ijpor/article/33/1/171/5811110?login=false , arises: minorities threatened by Islam are allying with the right against the left. That’s a main reason why leftists are losing votes in Europe. No, not all religions are the same, Christianity is not as bad as Islam. Islam is the most violent religion of modern times. Fact: Christians make 33% of world population and are responsible for only 3% of terrorist attacks. Muslims make 21% of the population and 96% of attacks. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311886.2019.1584957
“Vast majority peaceful Muslims” is not true. Most Muslims in several countries support killing in the name of Islam. For instance: 84% of Muslims in Egypt defend death penalty to apostates. https://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/old-assets/pdf/muslim-americans.pdf The mass migration of millions of Muslims to Europe is one of the biggest changes in modern history, of a magnitude whose consequences we still do not know, with an enormous risk of endless ethno-religious conflicts. Islam has been geographically and fundamentally incompatible with the West throughout history. Although there is the fairy tale of the “people of the Book” and examples of “peaceful coexistence” (as long as non-Muslims accept submission and have fewer rights), the clashes between Judaism, Christianity and Islam are among the longest and bloodiest conflicts in history.
Europe has already lost to Islam in several aspects. There are places in Europe where freedom and democracy are not valid anymore. Go to your nearest Muslim neighbourhood, raise a gay flag, kiss your gay lover, walk alone at night in short women’s clothes, dress as a Jew, show them a cartoon of Prophet Mohammed. High chances they’ll chop your head off. So never confront or harass an individual Muslim personally, you’re mathematically risking your life. That also affects European education: teachers criticizing Islam when Muslims are in the classroom is a big risk (based on statistics I already shared). It’s also not their fault, they’ve been brainwashed from childhood with this violent ideology. An indoctrinated child will be a fundamentalist adult, there is little chance of recovery. Europe will only be able to integrate Muslims by restricting all forms of Islamic education, when they teach children more philosophy, science, arts, civic values… and less religion… As Richard Dawkins says: religious education for children is child abuse.
read this book it will answer everything
https://annas-archive.org/md5/94b0acdf5db637f869255c5b4695eb04
mirror: https://archive.org/details/deen-of-deception-by-apostate-imam
that’s whataboutism
islam has spread the most terror in this world so it will be and has to be targeted
statistics show most muslims support sharia
and there are also 55 Muslim theocracies and only one christian
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Algebra was invented by Greeks, Babylonians, Indians, and Chinese. Al-Khwarizmi who was the father of algebra actually modified and translated the works of Greeks, Babylonians and Indians, and he was not an Arab, he was a Khwarizmian from Greater Persia
he also popularized indian numeral system, nowadays 1234567890 are known to be hindu arabic numerals but they are actually hindu numerals , the only way “arabs” contributed to it was mass producing research.
i am not saying arabs didn’t contribute to science it’s just pan-arabist and isalmist propaganda to say modern numbers and algebra are due to arabic/islamic impact
also
Al-Ghazali forbade math.
Ghazali, in his book, “The savior from Straying” (المنقذ من الضلال), states his position towards the math and philosophy, using this preface :
“There may occur negative points from the mathematics:
When someone starts to learn it, step by step, he will be interested in philosophies, and he will think that all other matters will be as clear as the math, so, when he sees the unhallowed speaking of the philosophers from the others, unintentionally, he will start to obey the unhallowed behavior of the philosophers, and will say: if the religion was right, so these great scholars would follow it, and when he hears that they (philosophers) deny the religion, he will say that the right path is to reject the religion…”
After a detailed discussion, he concludes that :
“To prevent ones from this big risk, we should prevent student from studying the mathematics. Although this knowledge (math) is not related to the religion directly, but because it is the starting point to getting stray, it (math) is forbidden.”
This way, he forbade the math.
Ghazali gave 18 reasons why women were inferior here and said that anyone who depends on arguments to seek the truth is restricting the mercy of god.
He also said that people who study logic would apply the same high standards to religious claims and find them lacking. He thought that people should already be certain in islam before studying.
In other words, you should assume islam is the truth before thinking critically about it so you dont become a disbeliever.
also
The Credit for Earlier Muslim Scientists’ Achievements Belongs to the Translated Works of Greek/Roman Scientists, Not Islam
Please note that:
None of the earlier Muslim scientists ever claimed to derive scientific discoveries directly from the Quran or Hadith.
Muslims were initially introduced to Greek/Roman scientific works through their conquests in Egypt and other regions. Later, Abbasid Caliph Mamun (d. 213 Hijri year) ordered the translation of these works into Arabic. Only after this development did Muslim scientists begin to emerge.
Muslims assert that the Sahaba (companions) of Muhammad were the best of Muslim generations. However, despite reading the Quran and Hadith throughout their lives, the Sahaba and the subsequent 5 to 10 Muslim generations were unable to extract any scientific knowledge from the Quran and the Hadith.
Present-day Muslims also struggle to extract scientific discoveries directly from the Quran/Hadith, often relying on science to make new findings before connecting them to the Quran.
Damages that Islam Inflicted upon the Science Islam made the whole Islamic world get religious education like a donkey. As a result, Islam produced millions of Islamic Scholars in the last 1400 years, who were involved only in Fiqh and Sectarian fights. Compared to those millions of Islamic Scholars, Islam was unable to produce even a handful of scientists.
And you will not see even a single woman in the list of those earlier Muslim scientists of the last 1400 years, while Islam considers women to be deficient in intelligence, and they had to stay at home in the name of “Islamic Modesty”.
Moreover, the prohibition of studying human anatomy by Islam, in the name of “respect” for the deceased hindered medical progress for centuries, impeding critical advancements in the medical field.
And then Islam also made life difficult for many Muslim scientists too due to their sects or atheist leanings. Ibn Sina was hiding his whole life, and he had to write his books in this state of hiding. Al-Razi was hit in his head by his own books in the mosque. Ibn-e-Rushd got the punishment for being an atheist. Yaqub al-Kindi lashed in public.
In contemporary times, schools in Muslim countries continue to teach that Darwin’s Theory of Evolution is incorrect, promoting the belief that humans were directly created by Allah and that Allah directly sent humans to the earth after a woman from the crooked rib of a man deceived him to eat the forbidden apple.
Taken from:
before people start making this about U.S and evangelism, i would like to ask is rule 1 enforced on comments?