By now you’ve likely heard that Representative Mike Johnson—the congressman Republicans finally elected as the new Speaker of the House after 22 days of chaos—played a significant role in the plot to overturn the 2020 election, a lowlight on his résumé that is obviously deeply concerning for the future of democracy. Also extremely worrisome? Johnson’s wildly bigoted remarks about homosexuality over the years, and the fact that he supported criminalizing gay sex between consenting adults.

CNN’s KFile reports that prior to his career in politics, Johnson wrote a series of deeply homophobic editorials in his role as an attorney for the socially conservative legal group now known as Alliance Defending Freedom.

  • Dojan
    link
    fedilink
    1412 years ago

    Opposite-sex marriage leads to incest and inbreeding. Maybe we should just outlaw marriage altogether.

    • @CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      502 years ago

      Honestly, I don’t know why marriage is even codified into law.

      I take that back, I do. But it’s a stupid reason.

      There really is no modern reason that marriage needs to be something you need to let the government know about.

      • HubertManne
        link
        fedilink
        102 years ago

        I agree. Its critical in the US because of how we ration healthcare. Which is just stupid.

        • @girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          132 years ago

          “Rationing healthcare” is such a dystopian ideology. It sounds like we’re unable to increase heathcare availability due to force(s) out of our control … which is the exact opposite of what happens.

          • ANGRY_MAPLE
            link
            fedilink
            7
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            It also partially excludes those who don’t earn a lot, at least where I live (Ontario, Canada).

            You earn around 30k a year? Hey, you get some benefits! Two people earning 50k a year? Well, obviously you don’t need those benefits anymore. In fact, let’s cut your collective returns down by a nice $342.

            Nothing changes if you’re just roommates, but they sometimes really want to verify that you’re not secretly common-law. You can get in legal trouble if you get caught.

            It was kind of messed up the first year that my partner and I filed taxes together, to be honest. We couldn’t do that until we were living together for 2 years (federal government), and 3 years (provincial government).

            They didn’t tell us to both save the entire previous year’s GST, and it ended with us having to pay between $500 and $700. That was a fun birthday suprise. The bad parts of common-law start before any of the benefits, apparently. They also seem to start before you can legally file. I tell everyone who I know is moving in with a partner, because fuck that noise. I wish someone told us earlier. Anyone, really.

                                            *rage* 
            
      • @DrRatso@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        502 years ago

        This is of course a non-US view, I’m not sure how different the laws are there. But marriage is a great one-stop shop that lets you get a lot of legal kerfuffles sorted in 20-30 minutes with nothing but a couple signatures. I don’t think it is a stupid reason, the stupidity comes from all the other bullshit people want to dump onto marriage.

      • @ramble81@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        252 years ago

        I’ve always thought that the word “marriage” should be removed from all laws since that’s a religious term and constantly quibbled about. Replace it with “civil union” defined as a joining between two consenting adults and leave the definition of “marriage” to the churches.

        • TipRing
          link
          fedilink
          82 years ago

          I don’t think we should cede marriage to religion. Marriage predates all modern religions. It has always been about property, a civil matter. Religion can fuck right off laying claim to the institution.

        • @buddhabound@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 years ago

          I feel the same way. For the purposes of government business, all marriages are civil unions, since it’s the contractual part the government cares about. As far as marriage goes, that’s up to each religion to determine according to its own standards and definitions, including who is allowed to conduct the ceremony and who is allowed to participate in the ritual.

          The government shouldn’t be able to dictate who I choose to share my assets and debts with, as long as they’re legally consenting adults who can sign the contract. And if someone wants to get married to a same sex partner in a church and that church won’t allow it, then they can find a church that better suits their values.

          Everyone wins.

          However, this is not what the theocrats want, which is why we have to deal with this shit. They want to be able to dictate what secular people do, and use the power of the state to force their religion on people regardless of church membership.

  • @Coasting0942@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    142 years ago

    It’s more likely to lead to polygamy again, which is kinda what the ultra religious want anyways, ratio weighted towards the alpha male of course.

    Polygamy will be legal and they’ll complain about any relationship with more than one man. Cause the Bible says….

      • Album
        link
        fedilink
        61
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        yup like this guy former Idaho Senator Larry Craig - staunch opponent of LGBTQ+ rights caught cruising for dick in a public bathroom. To be clear, the problem isn’t that he was doing gay stuff, but that he was a hypocrite about it and was clearly projecting his own insecurities into law.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Craig_scandal

        • @girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          162 years ago

          Same as Clinton, etc. America wasn’t pissed he had an affair … it was that he lied about it.

          Stop. Fucking. Lying.

          • @SocialEngineer56@notdigg.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            92 years ago

            Those are not even remotely the same thing.

            Politicians lying is a bad thing. Politicians making laws that harm Americans for things that they do themselves is worse. It’s lying plus damaging our society.

            Clinton lying about his affair didn’t impact any other American other than Monica Lewinsky and his wife.

          • @burntbutterbiscuits@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            02 years ago

            No. Not the same at all. It was fucking cool that Clinton got a blow job in the Oval Office, it was not cool that it was from a subordinate. Clinton did not commit any crimes nor misdemeanors. Oral sex is not sex.

      • @Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        These people legitimately don’t understand that standing on the corner, yelling “I DONT WANT TO FUCK DOGS” at random people is not a good way to convince people that they don’t want to fuck dogs.

    • Dojan
      link
      fedilink
      232 years ago

      Aye. It’s usually the ones that cry the loudest. How many times haven’t outspoken anti-gay people been caught having affairs with a partner of the same sex?

  • BobVersionFour
    link
    fedilink
    162 years ago

    And religious extremist lead the GOP to children rape and to all the laws against women to keep the supply of young kid so if i have to choose ? Let a guy marry is turtle

  • @MNByChoice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    182 years ago

    What is it with “hard labor”? Do the speakers really thing that makes them sound badass? The loss of freedom is a huge punishment already. The labor part is just letting someone profit off of human misery.

  • lorez
    link
    fedilink
    532 years ago

    So if I’m a male I can fuck my female dog no problem cos it’s not same sex. Good to know.