The tool, which is able to cut lines at depths of up to 4,000 metres (13,123 feet) – twice the maximum operational range of existing subsea communication infrastructure – has been designed specifically for integration with China’s advanced crewed and uncrewed submersibles like the Fendouzhe, or Striver, and the Haidou series.

  • @FauxLiving@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6128 days ago

    Powerful seems like a pointless adjective here.

    It doesn’t take much power to destroy a cable. Did they invent a really long, and powerful, chain with a powerful anchor on it only usable by a boat with powerful electric winch?

    Maybe they put AI in it too, for extra power of course

    • @PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      627 days ago

      Oh you mean the AI Pro Power Winch 9000? Available at a genocidal dictatorship near you for 3 easy payments of 19.99B USD.

  • @Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10128 days ago

    “That could reset the world order”

    Lmao, what hyperbolic bullshit. It’s just a cable cutter. Most nations have shit like this, but thanks for letting us know in the title this is just Chinese propaganda.

  • @Wahots@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5628 days ago

    No shit, lol. Those cunts have been cutting cables for almost a year now. This is why countries tend to hide the exact locations of cables. Shit is expensive.

  • Lit
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    If only cables can be designed to pull down ships that try to cut or anchor drag them. Maybe defensive cable around the main cable. Or some kind bigger of casing/shell around actual cable.

      • Lit
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        Making them lose the anchor by getting it trapped is good too.

  • Diva (she/her)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -128 days ago

    Operational depth is essentially the same as the claimed operational depth that oceangate sub that popped the other year. I have a lot more confidence that these things will actually work when China does it instead of some incompetent millionaire/billionaire.

      • @Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        128 days ago

        I sincerely hope they’re smart enough not to trigger that.

        Someone posted an article elsewhere on the thread about China practicing “dogfighting” in space - which, after you remove the fear-mongering, is just them figuring out how to do satellite-satellite maneuvering. Still immense opportunity for runaway collisions, but it seems like the military applicability is more toward sabotage than blowing things up. I could definitely see a scenario where high value satellites have had small boosters affixed to them, their electronics tampered, or some other way of commandeering or de-orbiting them to deprive their owners of them. A microwave + laser could disable smaller sats from above, then ablate some of their exterior to sap momentum so gravity drops them in short order. (Maybe. That’s idle speculation, but generating the power and dissipating the heat in space could make that idea impossible.)

        • @mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          Yeah, the only feasible way to do satellite warfare without creating a ton of debris is to mechanically attach to an enemy satellite and drop it out of orbit.

          Like imagine an autonomous attacker satellite that clamps onto the target satellite, and uses thrusters to drop itself (and the target) into the ocean. Any kind of kinetic weaponry to destroy the target satellite will just end up with a debris cloud around the earth, making future space travel impossible.

          But no country wants to invest in satellites just to intentionally drop them out of orbit. Every single attack would be prohibitively expensive when compared to just firing a missile at the satellite.

    • @kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      428 days ago

      Weird way to pronounce starlink, since it seems that’s what they’re hoping for. Privatizing the government

    • LustyArgonian
      link
      fedilink
      English
      027 days ago

      Well, everybody except people hooked up to Starlink and other satellite based internet

        • LustyArgonian
          link
          fedilink
          English
          126 days ago

          Are we talking about the data? I understand the hosts and servers are fine, but if the cables are all destroyed, we will have to rely on access to satellite internet. They are actively economically attacking Verizon, canceling contracts they had and replacing them with SpaceX ones.

          Like have ANY of you EVER roleplayed in DnD or like, done anything? Are you just chronically bamboozled? Genuinely curious. I talk to ppl like this all day every day - are you just stupid? Am I stupid for being here talking to you all trying to communicate what’s happening?

          Maybe you’re just dissociated and unable to register everything. Idk. Jesus.

  • @Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    528 days ago

    Good thing we have the channel tunnel I guess, repurpose that for data cables that are protected.

      • @Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        228 days ago

        Sure, it will be a shame to lose south/central America and Canada, but nothing else of value over there.

        • @WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          128 days ago

          most of online services run there. google, youtube, everything microsoft, credit card processing mastercard and visa, tons of others. surely they have EU infrastructure, but it’s a big question how would they handle a network split, if aallt

  • @REDACTED@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    126 days ago

    This feels really dumb from China. This is not a weapon against military. This is a weapon against civilian insfrastructure. You don’t get minds and hearts of people by attacking something they love

  • @Dasus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    Coming soon to vague shell corporation owned fishing boats to the shore of the Baltic and Northern seas!

    Sponsored by China and Russia

  • Phoenixz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1327 days ago

    Cool

    So for every European deep sea cable cut it should send a fleet of Russian and Chinese ships to the bottom, torpedo the fuckers. Just by default presume it was either of them and make then responsible for the safety of our cables. If you fail to protect our cables, we’ll send your ships to the next life.

    Gloves. Off.

    • @shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      627 days ago

      Exactly what I’ve been screaming. Hang the captain and first mate, scuttle the fucking ship. This shit needs to be treated as piracy, no quarter given.

        • @shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          127 days ago

          And that attitude is why China continues to test us, they know we’re pussies. You should see what they’re pulling on Vietnam and the Philippines in the South China Sea.

          • @lud@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            627 days ago

            I really don’t care.

            Capital punishment is immoral and that’s that.

            • @shalafi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              026 days ago

              Glad you’re in a society that is able to entertain that notion. Looks like that society is going to collapse. Good luck.

              • @lud@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                124 days ago

                From my point of view the country most famous for its death punishment is collapsing.