as a person that came from the 3rd world country and new in fediverse environment, i genuinely would like to know about this.

edit: thanks for the replies! sorry, i literally don’t know the reason since i’m not a western lol. twitter/x is too biased especially when musk openly supports trump so i came here and seeing fediverse is mostly are harris or biden (when he’s still up for the candidate) supporters. don’t know about reddit tho, i only use reddit as a forum for linux and programming stuff.

  • @mipadaitu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    478 months ago

    They’re here, anything pro trump is often downvoted, and most things heavily critical of the Dems are also often downvoted.

    For better or worse, there’s not a lot of right wing stuff that makes it into the positive on votes.

    If you sort new, you’ll see it pop up from time to time.

    It’s hard to tell sometimes, but it certainly feels like some political regimes are trying out dropping propaganda here or there into the conversation. I’m sure most of it is from genuine users, but there are some comments that just look like they’re here to stir up dissent.

    • goferking (he/him)
      link
      fedilink
      -18 months ago

      However Lots of places love to call those pointing out flaws in democratic policies trump supporters unfortunately

    • @snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      458 months ago

      For better or worse, there’s not a lot of right wing stuff that makes it into the positive on votes.

      That is for the better.

      • @ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        358 months ago

        You occasionally run into some disagreeable but unobjectionable “traditional” conservative opinions, usually around economics and the governments role in it, but trump shit isn’t that. We can be friends if you think a market solution is viable or better than an entitlement program. We can’t be friends if you think a significant portion of your fellow citizens are vermin or that we should just let terrible problems continue or get worse.

        The window has just shifted so far that literal objective depictions of reality are described as “left”.

      • @hypna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        48 months ago

        It would be nice to have some opposition, though. Even if most “conservative” media right now is little more than xenophobia, or cult worship, there do exist sound arguments against the typical internet-left positions. I don’t have a solid enough read on what comes through New in the fediverse to say whether any of that is being submitted and just downvoted off everyone’s feeds, or if all that’s being submitted is the average conservative media junk.

        Still, political spaces without opposition/diversity invariably degenerate into purity contests, and circle jerking.

        • @MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          48 months ago

          No, there’s really not sound arguments against them. That’s why nobody ever hears sound arguments.

          Stop assuming ghosts exist because you saw a picture frame on the wall move when a large truck went by…

          • @ABCDE@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            -38 months ago

            No, there’s really not sound arguments against them.

            That’s like saying there are no trade-offs to any policies; it’s simply not true. I’m as left as they come (not American left, British), but failing to admit there are flaws or sound arguments against left-wing ideas is very ignorant.

              • @ABCDE@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                08 months ago

                Not what I said, is it? The person said there are no arguments against “the typical internet-left positions”; which I disagree with. If such positions were infallible, they would always succeed. All policies have trade-offs.

                I didn’t mention “right … sound points” or their representation.

            • @MotoAsh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Nonono, you misunderstand the political landscape.

              Something having downsides IS NOT the same as the claims being made against things. If you think conservative politicians are arguing in good faith, you simply haven’t been listening.

              There really are not sound (conservative) arguments against them.

              If you do not agree, you do not know enough. Period.

                • @MotoAsh@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  4
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  Your pride in ignorance is pathetic. Perfect example of why public education is critically important to fund, and to fund properly.

                  Conservstives cling on to old, stupid ideas that are in the process of being proven wrong. Again and again and again and again.

                  But you go ahead and defend that hill that brought us golden gems of wisdom like “Trickle Down Economics”, private, for-profit prisons, and a lack of regulation so companies can dump what ever they want in to rivers and the ocean…

        • @Sunforged@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Conservative media comes through plenty in the form of business, tech and mainstream media sources 🙄

          Don’t confuse the fact that Republicans have become degenerate doesn’t mean their ideas are the basis of conservative ideology.

    • @vga@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      18 months ago

      The difference to Reddit et al is that votes don’t generally matter a huge lot in here. And you can easily hide them.

  • Flax
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I don’t like the deranged trumpists but unfortunately there’s not much Christian discussion on here and !christianity@lemmy.world gets downvote brigaded

      • Flax
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -68 months ago

        But downvoting posts just because they’re Christian in nature is just purely religious bigotry. Anti-theism isn’t much better, if not worse, depending on how someone follows their religion.

        • @TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          18 months ago

          Oh nonono, we’re not playing the “but atheism is a religion too and it’s worse!” Garbage

          Every Christian is “not like the other” Christians. The rhetoric isn’t welcomed on the fediverse because it’s poison.

          Stuff gets downvoted when it hits the all page. The conservative communities have the same problem: they’re not wanted here.

        • AbsentBird
          link
          fedilink
          English
          38 months ago

          Those dang anti-theists, with all their crusades, and inquisitions, and molestation scandals. At least when theists isolate you from your friends and family for being gay, or leaving an abusive relationship, it’s done in the name of God. What’s the anti-theists excuse?

          • Flax
            link
            fedilink
            English
            28 months ago

            This is actually laughable, but I’ll point out your own hypocrisy.

            Anti theism is desiring the eradication of all belief in God and mandatory atheism. By default and nature, it is bigoted and worse than everything you listed. But sure, let’s entertain this anyway.

            The aim of the Crusades were about taking back the Holy Lands from the occupying Muslim forces. Sure, religion was involved, but the same stuff happens with National ideology. Like Russia “taking back” Crimea in 2014. So getting rid of religion won’t stop things like this happening. Throughout modern history, most major wars were based on a secular political ideology, notably the First World, Second World, Cold, Korean and Vietnam wars.

            Second - Molestation scandals. These happen in any organisation, and like wars, aren’t inherently religious. Of course, large churches were a good target for child molestors, but the same thing happens with schools, generic celebrity stuff and broadcasting corporations. Sometimes on a bigger scale than the scandals in the Roman Catholic Church. Anything that gives anyone positions of power.

            Third - Let’s list some prominent anti-theist regimes.

            USSR - 1.2 Million killed in the purge.

            People’s Republic of China - “Fatality estimates vary across different sources, ranging from hundreds of thousands to millions, or even tens of millions.” (Of deaths in the cultural revolution). Christianity is still persecuted to this day, and the state can be described as anti-theistic.

            Nazi Germany - 6 million Jews killed in the holocaust. Very arguably anti theist as Hitler tried to eradicate Jews and suppressed Christianity that wasn’t theologically liberal in his favour.

            Obviously not everyone was killed in the precise name of anti-theism, but it still shows that the problem isn’t religion, which anti theism makes it out to be.

            Lastly, in the People’s Republic of China, people are often shunned for divorce and homosexuality, and it’s still a very atheistic country.

            For myself, I have never shunned anyone based on sexual orientation, gender identity or relationship status. I have never called for any of these people to be killed by the state for these either. I do not believe the state should be enforcing Christianity when someone’s immorality isn’t hindering anybody else (Such as Homosexuality or Polygamy) Yet if the anti theists had their way, they’d have me persecuted and likely killed because I am a Christian.

            • @MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Second - Molestation scandals. These happen in any organisation, and like wars, aren’t inherently religious.

              Ok, honestly, celibacy might’ve been facilitative for it. You know, accessible targets because instincts are instincts, even if it’s young boys.

              • Flax
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                And priests being celibate in the Roman Church is some mad doctrine which came about after the Reformation and contradicts 1 Timothy 3:2&13

                The doctrine of celibate priests is not a part of the Christian religion and I strongly disagree with it.

                Is worth mentioning though homosexual people and paedophiles could have became clergy in the Roman church to escape societal pressure - it would give an excuse for them not to be harassed by society asking “when wife” and over time, feelings got pent up and was unleashed in horrible ways. That’s just a theory, though

            • AbsentBird
              link
              fedilink
              English
              08 months ago
              1. That was the aim of some crusades, there were also the northern crusades which had the goal of slaying pagans and forcibly converting people to Christianity. Obviously not all war comes from religion, but Christianity does seem to have a penchant for interfaith violence.

              2. Not only have there been an out sized number of sex abuse scandals involving christian churches (most prominently the Catholic church) there’s been a clear pattern of retaliation, cover-ups, and defense of abusers. When there’s a scandal in a public school, the offender is fired and indicted. The church has routinely shielded offending priests, shuffling them around to avoid accountability.

              3. Nazi Germany was theistic, 98.5% of Nazis were Christians. Their belt buckles had “God is with us” inscribed on them. There has been more violence waged against theists by other theists than by anti-theists. Interfaith wars, sectarian violence, pogroms, inquisitions, forced conversions, over a thousand years of history shows clear patterns of religious violence. The USSR was anti-theistic (at least originally), and their persecution of religious people was wrong, but pretending that every anti-theist supports violent purges of the faithful is absurd. I am not an anti-theist, but I have friends who are, and they just want to be left alone.

              • Flax
                link
                fedilink
                English
                18 months ago

                1: Again, my point was that not all wars are religion based. Islam also have a penchant for it. The Bible doesn’t advocate war either (in fact, Jesus seems to imply the opposite) 2: The issue is an organisation of the Roman Catholic Church, not the religion itself. Large organisations like that are houses of cards. 3: Sure, the nazis may have been theistic but fundamentalist/orthodox (small o) Christians were still persecuted for rightfully calling out the evils of the Nazi regime.

                pretending that every anti-theist supports violent purges of the faithful is absurd.

                So you’ll think that you’ll manage to get me to renounce my faith and stop believing using laws without having to kill me? 🤣 Anti theism is the advocation of removing and persecuting religion. “Wanting to be left alone” is more akin to secularism, where the government doesn’t have a support or bias for any religion.

                • AbsentBird
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  18 months ago
                  1. Yes, Islam and Christianity both have a penchant for holy wars.

                  2. There are many large organizations that don’t put so much effort into shielding abusers.

                  3. Anyone who called out the evils of the Nazi regime was persecuted, including atheists who were often labeled ‘Russian supporters’ due to their lack of faith. ‘Godless’ communists were the first targets of Nazism.

                  I think most modern anti-theists aren’t interested in forcibly converting anyone, they see the rise of atheism as inevitable. They want to remove religion from schools and public life, stop posting the ten commandments everywhere, stop putting ‘god’ on money, etc. at least that’s what I hear about.

                  I don’t think anti-theists need to be advocates of forcing people to stop being religious, they can simply be opposed to theism. Like I’m opposed to the smoking of tobacco, but I’m not interested in prohibiting it, I just think it’s unhealthy and the world would be a better place if there was less of it. I think that’s how many anti-theists feel about religion. At least that’s the impression that I get from talking with them.

    • @SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      18 months ago

      NNN communities also get downvote brigaded, even though the famous Internet challenge is largely apolitical.

      • Flax
        link
        fedilink
        English
        18 months ago

        Nofap communities? How? It sounds like the most harmless thing

        • @SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          It’s not even nofap, it’s no nut November. The former is a philosophy, the latter is a challenge.

          I think people downvote nofap here because it makes some arguments that really stretch the truth and feed into bigger lies. In reality, there’s nothing wrong with not fapping, but there’s also nothing wrong with fapping.

          • Flax
            link
            fedilink
            English
            18 months ago

            Isn’t it moreso like alcohol? It can be abused but also can be in moderation?

            • @SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              18 months ago

              Yep. Although it’s hard to abuse fapping because you run out of sperm lol. It can be a big time waster though.

              • Flax
                link
                fedilink
                English
                18 months ago

                Screws up your pleasure receptors. If you use porn, it can also mess up your attractions

                • @SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  18 months ago

                  Never heard of the former, and you don’t need to use porn to fap. Porn addiction is absolutely a real thing though.

  • Rhynoplaz
    link
    fedilink
    125
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    There’s only one way you can support Trump today.

    You either refuse to acknowledge all the terrible things he’s done, or you approve of the things he’s done.

    People who refuse to acknowledge, are going to look at all the “fake news” on this site about His Oranginess, and quickly decide that it’s nothing but propaganda and go somewhere “more reliable”.

    Those who agree, stick around a little longer. They will argue and defend the horrible things, because they think there are more like them that will come out and back them up as a fellow defender of racism misogyny homophobia “Good old family values”. But they will be downvoted to oblivion and have trouble finding a friendly voice. Eventually, they too will go where they can have a more comfortable discussion with people who are as terrible as they are.

    And ironically enough, if you went to Truth Social, and asked why there weren’t more Biden/Harris supporters there, they’d give you the exact same answer in reverse.

    • @andrewta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      18
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      We had an opportunity years ago to fix this problem. Long before Trump ever showed up on the scenes as a political individual. We needed in schools to be teaching how to pick out real news from fake news. How to pick out fact from propaganda. Hell out to read a newspaper properly.

      How to logically pick a part in argument. We chose not to. We as a society, decided not to put our money towards that. Now people read a headline, and based purely on the headline, make a statement such as “throw the guy in jail for the rest of his life for that one “.

      I sat on a jury trial. It was a murder trial, if you went purely by what was in the local newspaper, you would’ve seriously questioned why the guy didn’t just take a plea deal. If you sat in that courtroom day after day, listening to it you’d realize this is a lot tougher than what you realize. we had a hard time figuring out if the guy was even in town at the time of the murder.

      But for those that weren’t involved in the trial, they’re convinced the guy belonged in jail for the rest of his life. Because people didn’t sit down and really read the newspaper and ask important questions. Because we don’t hold our journalists to a higher standard and force them to give all the information And tell both sides of the story.

      I have no idea how you solve the problem anymore. Because at this point, even if you tell the complete truth about any given politician, no one‘s going to believe what they’re reading anymore because there’s another so-called journalist out there saying the exact opposite and people say well I don’t know what to believe then. And can’t figure out how to critically think about this and ask questions.

      Here in Lemmy we are guilty of the same sort of thing, same as over at truth social same as over at Twitter same as over Facebook.

      As a society, I’m sorry for the language here, we are well and truly fucked.

      I truly don’t know what the answer is.

      Also sidenote 10 bucks says somebody comes back with a stupid comment of well since you don’t know what the answer is obviously you’re just saying that we shouldn’t do anything and just give up.

      • @jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        78 months ago

        Neglecting public education is really going to keep biting us in the ass.

        Something like half of US adults can’t read at a sixth grade level.

        If we took some of the idiotic venture capitalist “it’s cat gifs on the block chain” nonsense and put it into education and infrastructure, we’d be so much better off.

        I don’t really know how to get from here to there, either. Give me magic powers to Thanos snap away some people, maybe?

      • @Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        9
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        If you’ve never watched the movie 12 Angry Men, do yourself a favor and watch it. You are going to love it and it has everything to do with your comment.

      • @Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        18 months ago

        I have no idea how you solve the problem anymore. Because at this point, even if you tell the complete truth about any given politician, no one‘s going to believe what they’re reading anymore because there’s another so-called journalist out there saying the exact opposite and people say well I don’t know what to believe then. And can’t figure out how to critically think about this and ask questions.

        Reverse cargo cult.

      • barooboodoo (he/him)
        link
        fedilink
        08 months ago

        We needed in schools to be teaching how to pick out real news from fake news.

        Obviously there are issues with education in this country but it’s always an easy scapegoat for these kinds of issues. Plenty of states have skills like this in their common core, I would venture to say you’re incorrect on that point.

        • @andrewta@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          58 months ago

          Fair enough I graduated in the early 90s at that time we didn’t have it. At least not at the level that I felt that we should’ve. If I’m wrong on that, then I apologize.

          • barooboodoo (he/him)
            link
            fedilink
            28 months ago

            No worries, you just hear a lot of misguided criticisms of the education system a lot of which are based on anecdotal experiences. I wish everyone would keep tabs on what kids are learning and have a more hands on approach to curricula.

            • @andrewta@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              28 months ago

              So what you are saying is I should be volunteering for the geography classes to help reinforce the flat earth ideals? 😁

              • @aalvare2@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                2
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Oh fucking christ, a flat-earther. You people are even worse than the fucking round-earther scum on this platform.

                I swear you people will never accept a velociraptor-shaped earth, prolly cuz your brains just aren’t big enough to process the geometry.

                Edit: I really hoped the /s would not be necessary…

    • Orbituary
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      You either refuse to acknowledge all the terrible things he’s done, or you approve of the things he’s done.

      This is two ways. You literally said either / or.

  • @Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    368 months ago

    They absolutely exist. But in general, I think most people here are informed and choose a wide variety of information to consume. That is exactly the opposite of most Trump supporters.

  • BlackLaZoR
    link
    fedilink
    68 months ago

    Lemmy is full of communists/socialists - this is an opposite side of political spectrum

    • @ABCDE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      38 months ago

      Is it? I’ve only seen a lot of centrist/centre-right Democrats and people who align with them.

      • Cowbee [he/they]
        link
        fedilink
        38 months ago

        Why join Lemmy.world as a Socialist? There’s a lot less Socialist content to interact with that way

        • Socialist Mormon Satanist
          link
          fedilink
          -78 months ago

          Well I didn’t join Lemmy just to do Socialist stuff. I just happen to be a socialist, and I joined Lemmy. What instance to you recommend?

          • Cowbee [he/they]
            link
            fedilink
            18 months ago

            The 3 biggest Socialist-friendly instances are Lemmy.ml (FOSS and Privacy focused but maintained by Communists), and the 2 dedicated Communist instances, Lemmygrad.ml and Hexbear.net.

            If you want to see as much content as possible, liberal or otherwise, Lemmy.ml will let you see it. Lemmy.ml doesn’t block Hexbear or Lemmygrad, so you can interact with those communities while retaining access to Lemmy.ca and Lemmy.world.

            If you are a dedicated Marxist-Leninist, Lemmygrad takes itself “seriously,” though it’s the smallest of the 3.

            If you’re generally a Socialist, Hexbear is a Left-Unity instance made up of Communists and Anarchists, is by far the most active leftist instance, and also the most self-sustainable thanks to its large and active userbase. Plus, it’s less serious.

            TL;DR based on what you’ve said, either Lemmy.ml or Hexbear.net, the former if you want to retain access to Lemmy.ca and Lemmy.world while gaining access to Hexbear and Lemmygrad, the latter if you want a much more active community than Lemmy.ml federated with most instances, with the exclusion of Lemmy.world and Lemmy.ca

  • BarrierWithAshes
    link
    fedilink
    88 months ago

    Well Truth Social is running off Mastodon so they are kind of here. Just invisible (I don’t tihnk truth social is federated with anything). When I was on Kbin I at least saw quite a few conseravatives. Can’t really speak to this instance since on my end it all just appears as the same.

  • @doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    228 months ago
    1. There probably are some right-wing instances, but I’m guessing they all got defederated for… reasons…

    2. Conservatives already have their own platforms e.g. truth social, twitter, 4chan, others

    3. The very format of Lemmy is more egalitarian. For example, it gives an enormous amount of power to individual users to filter out unwanted content, and decentralizes content moderation over a variety of instances. This doesn’t appeal to some right-wing ideologues who seem to value more hierarchical, centralized systems. Basically, Lemmy is more democratic (or has the potential to be more democratic) than other platforms.

  • @xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    248 months ago

    They’re here, you can find them if you look in the right places - however, most fediverse admins are technically apt and left leaning so Trump bullshit often gets folks banned and, when it doesn’t, they usually get a very negative response.

  • krimsonbun
    link
    fedilink
    English
    358 months ago

    Decentralized network designed to stand up to big tech by gay trans furries. Not much appeal for those folks round these parts.

  • Sudo Sodium
    link
    fedilink
    English
    58 months ago

    Lemmy and Maatodon clearly accept left-wing values more than right-wing

  • @drkt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    158 months ago

    There is a whole separate lemmyverse full of conservatives and pedophilia. They are defederated from every sane instance.