What happened next that evening in May 2021 is the basis for a lawsuit by the mother alleging that Burlington police used excessive force and discriminated against her unarmed son, who is Black and has behavioral and intellectual disabilities.

After he failed to hand over the last of the stolen e-cigarettes, two officers physically forced him to do so, then Cathy Austrian’s son was handcuffed and pinned to the ground as he screamed and struggled, according to a civil lawsuit filed Tuesday and police body-camera video shared with The Associated Press by the American Civil Liberties Union of Vermont.

The teen eventually was injected with a ketamine, a sedative, then taken to a hospital, according to the lawsuit and video.

  • @zerog_bandit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    731 year ago

    Absolute definition of white privilege to think that calling the police to lecture her black son would yield positive outcomes.

    I say this as a white person.

  • Endorkend
    link
    fedilink
    491 year ago

    And then people wonder why as a neurodivergent person, I’ve passed over several obscenely lucrative contracts simple because they required me to go to the US for any extent of time.

    • @herrcaptain@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      391 year ago

      Buddy, I’m not neurodivergent and I also straight up refuse to set foot in that place. I don’t even feel particularly comfortable sharing a border with them at this point. Lots of the people are great, but the government and many of its institutions scare the hell out of me.

      • @Sagifurius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        201 year ago

        You live in a country with the fucking RCMP and yet have let the media convince you their institutions are scary.

        • Canadian cops are scary too, but it’s not even close. US cops are five times more likely to kill. And Canadian cops don’t have qualified immunity.

          • @Sagifurius@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            And yet when they run 14 year olds over with their cruiser in a school playground nothing happens.

            • I did a quick search for this but nothing came up. Do you have a link to an article?

              Cars are the number one killer of children in Canada. We tolerate a disgusting amount of preventable traffic accidents in Canada, but comparing that to killing children by shooting them or putting them into deadly chokeholds is nonsensical.

        • @herrcaptain@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          121 year ago

          I’m not saying the RCMP (or local cops) are much better, and we have plenty of our own problems. These days those mainly stem from the import of MAGA-style “conservatism,” and I’ll admit that things have been getting noticeably worse around here.

          That said, we don’t have school shootings pretty much every week, insane amounts of gun violence, the overreach of homeland security (my biggest reason for not wanting to set foot down there - crossing the border), people having to mentally run a cost/benefit analysis if they need to go to the hospital, talk of civil war, half our political representatives being clinically insane (here it’s a little less), people going to jail for weed (a small bit of good that’s happened here during a period of general backslide), the alphabet agencies (the RCMP has historically done some heinous shit but it’s child’s play compared to the CIA), the fact that a rapist who actively says he wants to destroy democracy has a very good chance of becoming president again, etc, etc, etc.

          So yeah, I’ll happily stay in the country with the RCMP.

    • @LesserAbe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      Naturally you should do what you’re comfortable with. I will say that the most upsetting news stories from any place aren’t representative of what it’s like to live there. As a lifelong resident I don’t know anyone personally who has been shot or shot at in the U.S, and don’t know anyone who has been wrongfully arrested or assaulted by the police.

      That’s not to say it’s not a problem that needs to be addressed, it is. Just if someone is turning down opportunities they would otherwise accept out of fear of this thing, I would say they may be overweighting the risk.

      It reminds me how my mom would always text me when I lived in the city, “did you hear about this shooting? Are you ok?” But I wouldn’t have even been aware there was an incident. There are a lot of people in the world. The absolute crime rate has overall been going down. But the ability for us to hear about horrible incidents has only increased.

      • @Misconduct@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        I talked to a guy a while ago that genuinely would not believe I’ve never owned or handled a gun. Absolutely would not accept it and said I was lying lol. I think I briefly saw a hunting rifle in my uncle’s closet as a kid but that’s pretty common even outside the US. There are people out there that really think we’re ALL armed to the teeth I guess

  • sylver_dragon
    link
    fedilink
    English
    671 year ago

    What do you say to the armed, violent, unstable nutcase with a gun?
    Good morning, Officer.

    • What sound does a cow make? Moo. What sound does a dog make? Woof. What sound does a cat make? Meow. What sound does a pig make? UP AGAINST THE WALL MOTHER FUCKER.

  • @Minotaur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    171 year ago

    Yeah god bless the woman I’m sure she had good intentions - but she’s not living in some 1990s public service announcement where the nice policeman gives valuable lessons to children.

    Police are like… an absolute last resort “I need someone shot” measure. The fact that we also have them (for no particular reason) also authorize things like reports for insurance related incidents is a pretty colossal failure of “the system” as a whole

    • Æon
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      Exactly this. I can’t imagine how sheltered I’d have to be to still believe calling the police to “teach someone a lesson” is anything but a catastrophically bad idea. And I’m pretty sheltered already!

  • @shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -25
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Liberals: “GUNS BAD!”

    Also Liberals: “Calling the cops will get you killed!”

    Fuck am I supposed to do?!

    POC, LGBT and women: “We’re the biggest gun purchasing demographic because we see what’s coming.” That’s our right, and everyone but white liberals seems to be exercising it.

    Did I make you uncomfortable? Sure as hell hope I did. The problem is our culture, not people like me.

    I’ll defend you if it comes to it, do my damndest if it comes to “trains”, but please stop whining about gun owners. Stop whining about, “They want to exterminate trans people!” Get a fucking clue and work towards self-defense. FFS, stop losing votes.

    I often read, “But gosh! What if the pigs exterminate ME personally?!” Either grow a pair and die with your boots on, or get the fuck out my face. This isn’t a schoolyard tussle. We’re entering a fight for American democracy, and for you gay and trans folks, it’s a fight for your right to continue life.

    • @morphballganon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Liberals don’t say “guns bad.” They say “let’s make sure only people who pass a background check can buy them.”

      But I guess the truth isn’t relevant to your narrative.

      • Dark Arc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        I mean it’s the same problem broad labels always have … liberals the term is for everything left of Bernie Sanders to the ball park Joe Manchin depending on who you’re talking to.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      Why do you want people uncomfortable with you having a gun? Do you have some sort of need to instill fear in people who aren’t doing you any harm?

      • HACKthePRISONS
        link
        fedilink
        -61 year ago

        either you didnt read what they wrote or you are making the worst bad faith interpretation intentionally

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          91 year ago

          This is what they wrote:

          POC, LGBT and women: “We’re the biggest gun purchasing demographic because we see what’s coming.” That’s our right, and everyone but white liberals seems to be exercising it.

          Did I make you uncomfortable? Sure as hell hope I did. The problem is our culture, not people like me.

          Seems like maybe you didn’t read it.

          • HACKthePRISONS
            link
            fedilink
            -111 year ago

            i guess i didnt consider that you might have a problem with reading comprehension

            • Flying Squid
              link
              fedilink
              81 year ago

              Ah, insulting me rather than explaining what I supposedly misread. Sounds to me like I didn’t actually misread anything and you just want to attack me for not being afraid of guns for some reason.

              Sorry, I’m still not afraid of guns and you can’t insult me into being afraid of them.

              • HACKthePRISONS
                link
                fedilink
                -81 year ago

                Nobody saying you should be afraid of guns. They’re saying that you should be uncomfortable with disarming vulnerable people.

                • Flying Squid
                  link
                  fedilink
                  51 year ago

                  That’s not what they said.

                  Again, this is what they said:

                  POC, LGBT and women: “We’re the biggest gun purchasing demographic because we see what’s coming.” That’s our right, and everyone but white liberals seems to be exercising it.

                  Did I make you uncomfortable? Sure as hell hope I did. The problem is our culture, not people like me.

                  I don’t know why you’re trying to gaslight me when this is the second time I’ve pasted what they said.

                  Now I guess you’ll insult me again?

    • @Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Guess what? If you had good laws the other side wouldnt have guns either. What we propose? No guns and a well educated police force. You in america have the worst combination of crazy people like you, hoping for the day they can shoot someone, gun fetishism, idiotic gun laws and a completely untrained and aggressive police force.

    • queermunist she/her
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      You’d think if liberals actually believed Trump is a fascist and American democracy is on the ballot, they’d arm themselves to be prepared.

  • BombOmOm
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -571 year ago

    I’m not sure what you expected. You told the police about a crime, do you not expect them to arrest the criminal?

    • @teegus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      201 year ago

      If a cop in my country injected ketamine into a minor during an arrest it would be in the national news for weeks. Totally unacceptable.

    • @otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      271 year ago

      Do they not treat children and adults differently in the legal system where you come from?

      This wasn’t a murder or any other violent crime. It was petty theft from a business committed by a minor.

    • Th4tGuyII
      link
      fedilink
      19
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      For a petty theft committed by a mentally disabled minor?

      The situation was non-violent and under control - the cops escalated far beyond what was needed because they got bored waiting for the kid to fork over the last couple of e-cigarettes. There was no need to pin the kid to the ground, and definitely no need to inject them with ketamine.

      In a world where all cops weren’t bastards, they would have continued to build a rapport until they could convince the kid to give them back, give the kid a lecture about stealing, then let everyone be on their way.

      • VaultBoyNewVegas
        link
        fedilink
        121 year ago

        It’s like some people don’t understand what community policing or policing by consent is. Cops shouldn’t be resorting to force unless they really have to and someone not handing over an e cig in no way warrants being tackled or restrained plus with neurodivergent people that only makes them more agitated which then obviously makes the situation worse.

        It’s not fucking rocket science that different situations call for different responses and some situations only really need a fucking talking or conversation.

        • Th4tGuyII
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          Exactly. In a sane world, cops shouldn’t ever be the ones escalating any situation, especially one where there is no on-going threat

    • Alto
      link
      fedilink
      261 year ago

      It takes a special mix of thin blue line bootlicking and thinking the world revolves around you to think this was a good idea.

  • @LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    -51 year ago

    I’m 100% on board that this was unnecessary, but how should police handle something like this? It’s a 230 pound 14 year old hormonal teenager that turned sullen and refused to comply.

    Presumably the smart way would be to say “Ok your behavior is not ok but I’ll leave you be for now until you cool down.” and then just leave. I mean if you want to press charges you can come back any time. I don’t quite understand why in the US everyone is arrested instead of getting “a summons” (?).

    I’d also say that nicotine is often used for self medication by people with mental issues, including ADHD. Smoking is more prevalent. Vaping provides a much safer alternative. Not condoning 14 year olds vaping but it could explain why he wants them.

    • ???
      link
      fedilink
      9
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m 100% on board that this was unnecessary, but how should police handle something like this? It’s a 230 pound 14 year old hormonal teenager that turned sullen and refused to comply.

      USING WORDS.

      • @LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        I don’t think so. My guess is that sometimes the only way to deescalate is to leave someone alone. That’s what you’d have to teach police. But presumably only a qualified mental health professional can answer that question.

        • @treefrog@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          Mental health student with his own emotional issues and that raised two small kids .

          Yes, often the way to desecalate is to take space. It’s anger management 101. If someone is not able to recognize they need space, the one able to should call for a time out (this is how time outs should be used by parents, not as punishment).

          Police are trained to exert authority. It’s not de-escalation training generally.

          Which is why mental health professionals should accompany police in situations like this.

          • @LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Thanks. Hmm, maybe police officers have mental health issues that prevent them from retreating and asserting their “authoritae”. Maybe no amount of training or accompanying will help with that.

            • @treefrog@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              Police are trained to ‘keep the peace’ in a lot of situations. Like, in a bad traffic accident, the cops are there to direct traffic while the EMTs and Firefighters take the lead.

              We just need to teach them to do the same with mental health workers and make that the standard for anything that’s not a criminal complaint. They already do this with stuff like CPS calls in a lot of jurisdictions.

              But yeah, a lot of cops are drawn to the job because they love power and authority. And it will take decades of restructuring of US policing to change that cultural tendency.

  • @Fisk400@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    761 year ago

    This is a minor problem compared to the fucking forced ketamin injections but can we please use more words to describe these types of issues. Like, specific ones. “Behavioral issues and intellectual disabilities” has also been used to describe the kid that almost beat a teacher to death for saying he shouldn’t have his Nintendo in school and the flying guy that tried to kill the judge. If there is no difference between how we describe them and this kid, we are just reinventing calling people retarded in increasingly elaborate ways.

    • @medgremlin@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      211 year ago

      I see your point, but that is a bigger can of worms than I think you are expecting. There are dozens of genetic or congenital disorders that can lead to intellectual disabilities and hundreds of acquired ones; all of which result in a range of severity. Also, “intellectual disabilities” and “behavioral problems” are very large buckets of different manifestations. In order to differentiate in the way that you are asking for, they would need to report exact diagnoses and give a detailed description of the individual to differentiate them, and even then, there would need to be a lot of context and clarification if they are to avoid misinterpretation or misunderstanding of any terms or descriptions used.

      • @Fisk400@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        91 year ago

        I’m not saying it’s easy. When I say specific I just mean more specific than the huge bucket we currently have. Maybe 5 buckets so that this kid doesn’t need to share a bucket with the Nintendo kid i mentioned.

      • @Fisk400@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        101 year ago

        I’m sure there is some middle ground we can find. His mother is named in the article and his actions were explained in depth so I don’t see a problem with being a bit more specific with what caused the behaviour. Especially when the phrase is also used to describe quite violent people.

        • @girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          91 year ago

          I have to wonder why you want a clearer picture of what the boy was suffering from, 'cause from my vantage point it seems it’s only to satisfy your own curiosity rather than solve a larger issue.

          Imo it’s none of our business what his diagnoses was as he was the victim here.

          • @Fisk400@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            -11 year ago

            If it’s not relevant they dont need to bring it up. If it is relevant I would like to know what way it is relevant. I am fine with either but not both.

            Don’t forget that the reason I want there to be more detail is because they used the expression as an excuse for that guy that jumped the judge. A guy that was articulate and friendly right up until he turned feral. I think it is doing this kid a disservice to put these two very different people under the same vague header. It’s what they did with the r-slur and it’s why it’s considered a slur today.

            • @girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              31 year ago

              Again, in this particular instance he was the victim.

              Blanket rules in revealing diagnoses do not take into account individual’s right to privacy. I prefer to respect that right vs your request to know.

                • @girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  31 year ago

                  Because being specific is a breach of privacy. It’s really none of our business unless ofc one is a busybody.

  • @WoahWoah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    110
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Obviously the police are the criminals here, but that mom…

    They clearly didn’t grow up being told what I was always told: “if you’ve got a problem and you call the police, now you’ve got two problems.”

    • @Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      24
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah this is some abusive, privileged bullshit and I really hope this idiot learned a lesson. I also hope her child reminds her of this shit anytime she starts mounting her high horse in the future.

      • @WoahWoah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        -1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes, the elderly woman that adopted an at-needs child of color is the one being abusive and privileged.

        The abusive, privileged bullshit is your comment.

          • @WoahWoah@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            56
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            She mistakenly thought that calling the cops to talk to her child about not stealing would help him understand why it’s wrong and what the stakes are. She’s an old white woman. She didn’t realize that cops wouldn’t treat her large, black child as subhuman.

            She was stupid and ignorant, but the cops are the monsters here. Don’t get it twisted with your own relationships with your parents. This isn’t that.

            • @wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
              link
              fedilink
              -41 year ago

              Insanely weird to project your parental issues on a lady calling the cops on her adopted black child, but being old is not an excuse for not being aware of the century long issue of cops treating black people poorly.

                • ???

                  There was no “no u” here.

                  Are you whiny about the fact that they projected their parental issues onto anyone who correctly judged the idiot for calling the cops? Thats their projection, that they said.

                  Correctly noting the idiot should have known better about the older-than-her issue of cops beating black folk for the sin of being black has nothing to do with anyones parents.

                  Telling someone not to project their problems isnt a “no u,” but its cute your best retort was to brag about how poorly you read.

              • @Doof@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                161 year ago

                there was a time where media portrayed that as a reasonable thing to do, the police would come and talk to their kid. I’ve heard stories about it happening. Hell when i kid we got caught being destructive and the cops who caught us took us on tour of where we could end up. We got brought in the truck straight to the cells. It is a foolish thought but a person who holds some idyllic model in their heads sometimes are blinded by it.

                • @wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  111 year ago

                  She has a black lives matter sign in front of her house.

                  She isnt senile, and she is aware of a movement dedicated to dealing with police aggression.

                  Her age isnt an excuse. She clearly should have known better. Its insane to excuse her behavior.

                • When I was in cubs as a child, they took us to a police station and the cops talked to us about various things, we got our fingerprints taken (for us to keep, not their system) and we got to check out the jail cells.

                  Cops have definitely been used for educational purposes in the past. I don’t remember much of it specifically, but i remember it being a great experience.