• NoneOfUrBusiness
      link
      fedilink
      1218 days ago

      Okay, and? Like them or hate them (jk you should hate them) but they had a state; it wasn’t “a failed state ruled by warlords”.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness
          link
          fedilink
          1318 days ago

          No it’s not? A failed state is one in which the state can’t punish a significant amount of non-state sanctioned violence, which wasn’t the case in Afghanistan.

          • @FarceOfWill@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            418 days ago

            I suppose if you use that definition then when America invaded it became a failed state run by warlords and now it has recovered.

            • NoneOfUrBusiness
              link
              fedilink
              718 days ago

              Yeah exactly. Now, being a non-failed state, they can start the long, gruelling process of cultural and political evolution. That’s why you’re hearing about Afghani human rights activists now but not ten years ago.