- cross-posted to:
- programmer_humor@programming.dev
- cross-posted to:
- programmer_humor@programming.dev
You must log in or register to comment.
Good, OOP can suck my balls
Balls.suck() is the correct syntax.
Actually, it would be
OOP.suck(ddplf.getBalls())
Don’t you need to declare new Balls() first? Or do you suck() Balls static?
BallsFactory ballsFactory = new BallsFactory(); ballsFactory.setSuckable(true); Balls balls = ballsFactory.create();
All of this is okay, but it’s not production ready. This is what real production code looks like:
SuckableFactory suckableFactory = new SuckableFactory(); Suckable balls = suckableFactory .setShape(SuckableShapes.round) .setCount(2) .create(); SuctionProvider mouth = SuctionProvider.getInstance(); SuckerFactory suckerFactory = new SuckerFactory(); Sucker sucker = SuckerFactory.create(): sucker.setSuctionProvider(mouth); sucker.setSuckable(balls); sucker.setIntensity(SuckerSuctionIntensities.medium); sucker.suckSuckable();
Python port:
from ballsucker import suck suck()
Or I didn’t using the correct naming convention!