• @Numberone@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    289 months ago

    Isn’t the point of protest to not let people forget about things? How easy would it be in the west to not notice, the media certainly isn’t keeping up on it. Every time I see one of these I think, that’s a braver person than me, and thank fucking god for the Streisand effect. No downvote, but strong disagree.

          • @Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            169 months ago

            “Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue,” King wrote. “It seeks so to dramatize the issue that it can no longer be ignored.”

            • MLK Jr. on the nature of nonviolent protests
              • @Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                139 months ago

                If you genuinely think a dictionary has a better understanding of protests than Martin Luther King Jr, you either don’t know his history or are not being serious

                  • @AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    1
                    edit-2
                    9 months ago

                    Of course they can. Dictionaries are not the Bible. They exist to describe how words are used, not how they should be used. Words’ meaning changes over time (“gay” meant “happy” in the 20th century, to use the tired example) and new words get added to the dictionary every day (most dictionary websites have little blurbs showing words they’ve recently added). Dictionaries have historically, and continue to, change in response to how people use words, not the other way around. If your entire argument rests on the dictionary definition of the word “protest” not explicitly mentioning that to be considered a protest, something must be disruptive, it’s not a very good argument.

                    It also fails to consider that methods of convincing people who would rather simply ignore the issue to care about it that are not disruptive are few and far between.

          • @AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            And when exactly did “people turn it into” that? The purpose of a picket line is to be disruptive, and people have been doing those for over a century.

      • @Numberone@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        109 months ago

        Yes I do think that. Protest tactics change but they seem to gravitate toward noncompliance and, yes, disruption. I honestly can’t think of a successful protest that was all roses and hugs. Could be missing something.

        • @ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I agree, but I also think it depends.

          Protesters have blocked hospital entrance ways which is absolutely NOT okay, it can result in people dying and I think the protesters involved should be charged with manslaughter in those cases.

          I think I’m fine with disruptive protests as long as it’s not harmfully disruptive. I also think disruptive protests can piss people off and make them angry at you rather than what you are protesting about, and it can end up hurting your cause.

          • @Numberone@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            29 months ago

            Absolutely, because that makes my life more difficult, as a restaurant owner. I don’t feel like that says anything about it tactically or morally though.

              • @Numberone@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -19 months ago

                I’m speaking from within a fictional situation that was presented. If I were someone else would I fire someone…the answer is probably. My principled take as myself, I wouldn’t for the reasons I’ve been talking about throughout this thread. Everyone has different reasons for what they do. OP put their opinion and I put mine. I don’t know what else to say…

              • @CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                49 months ago

                Cool with a 10 minute long ad about civil unrest in the middle of a movie you paid to see?

                He interrupted mid song for 10 minutes? Or was it a 2 minute preamble and then a regular performance?

                “Oh, you’re fine with this thing? What if it was something COMPLETELY DIFFERENT?!”

              • @Numberone@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                English
                29 months ago

                Yeah, a phone company is never never never going to alienate customers like that. And the power dynamics in that situation are quite different. If you’re looking to suss out the limits of what I think about this than you’ve done it. I 100% agree people shouldn’t come to physical harm. Again, that’s quite a different situation than the one described in the article though.

                  • @Numberone@startrek.website
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    1
                    edit-2
                    9 months ago

                    I don’t have to like it, That’s literally my point. Let’s try this, rather than try to find my line, which I’ve already said was somewhere around causing bodily harm to uninvolved people, what do YOU think is an appropriate form of protest? It seems like that’s what you’re trying to get off your chest in a round about way.

                  • @CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    29 months ago

                    I wonder how you’d like a 20-30 minutes lecture in the middle of a movie

                    2 minute statement before the performance, 30 minute lecture in the middle of a performance, totally the same thing.

      • @CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        79 months ago

        When did they say it had to be disruptive? They just said the point was to not let people forget.

        If you consider the statement “x is bad” to be disruptive then I wonder what you think a “non-disruptive protest” actually is. Thoughts and prayers?

      • @corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19 months ago

        I didn’t find the definition that said “block ambulances”, and I have to say that was effective when the hillbillies did that. I hope even your idea of “annoy people who can’t help” doesn’t include critical services.

      • @Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -69 months ago

        I hate the message you started with. But I agree with this. These modern protesters are scum bags who often are a major reason why their own cause never makes much progress.

        • @AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          8
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Ah yes, the massively disruptive tactic of checks notes saying genocide is 1) bad and 2) happening prior to playing a piano piece. You’re right, he’s really crossed the line this time. How can he ever expect to garner support like that?

          He’s almost as bad as the people with megaphones and signs marching and repeating chants!

          • @Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Not this guy, I mean the protestors targeting random people like deflating tires of people going to work, throwing soup at art and standing in traffic. I don’t get how this guy was protesting. It sounds like he was just saying common sense things. I don’t get what the protest is here. Saying you support journalist doesn’t seem like a protest. Just a statement