• @AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      And when exactly did “people turn it into” that? The purpose of a picket line is to be disruptive, and people have been doing those for over a century.

    • @Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      169 months ago

      “Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue,” King wrote. “It seeks so to dramatize the issue that it can no longer be ignored.”

      • MLK Jr. on the nature of nonviolent protests
        • @Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          139 months ago

          If you genuinely think a dictionary has a better understanding of protests than Martin Luther King Jr, you either don’t know his history or are not being serious

            • @AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Of course they can. Dictionaries are not the Bible. They exist to describe how words are used, not how they should be used. Words’ meaning changes over time (“gay” meant “happy” in the 20th century, to use the tired example) and new words get added to the dictionary every day (most dictionary websites have little blurbs showing words they’ve recently added). Dictionaries have historically, and continue to, change in response to how people use words, not the other way around. If your entire argument rests on the dictionary definition of the word “protest” not explicitly mentioning that to be considered a protest, something must be disruptive, it’s not a very good argument.

              It also fails to consider that methods of convincing people who would rather simply ignore the issue to care about it that are not disruptive are few and far between.

                • @Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  89 months ago

                  Got it, so all the protests for US labor laws, for the end of segregation, and for the end to Apartheid South Africa are all not protests by your definition. Because they interfered with the flow of other’s lives.

                  I strongly suggest you read any of the works of MLK Jr or his autobiography. Because you fundamentally misunderstand the point of nonviolent protests against injustice