• Armok: God of Blood
      link
      fedilink
      English
      39 months ago

      I don’t know what the laws are like in the UK concerning firearm ownership, but I can’t imagine they’re on the side of arming the peasantry.

      • Brave Little Hitachi Wand
        link
        fedilink
        English
        49 months ago

        You can obtain guns, but there are limits and requirements to try to make sure they’re being stored properly and only bought in reasonable numbers for legitimate purpose.

        • Armok: God of Blood
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I assume if you write in “I want to provide security for protestors” on your application, they wouldn’t be too inclined to consider it a legitimate purpose.

          • Turun
            link
            fedilink
            English
            39 months ago

            By and large guns don’t provide security.

            There are a lot more creative ways to protest violently though!

            • Armok: God of Blood
              link
              fedilink
              English
              29 months ago

              It’s not about protesting with the intent to commit violence. I think the police would be less inclined to escalate things if people were carrying long guns at the perimeter of the protest. It’s easy to commit violence against a group of people if you’re reasonably sure they’re all unarmed.

              • Turun
                link
                fedilink
                English
                39 months ago

                I think we kinda misunderstand what the other person is saying/what they imagine the outcome to be. There’s a crass culture difference here.

                In the UK (and presumably most other European countries) the police would 100% escalate things if they see someone with a gun near a large aggregation of people. Carrying guns like that is simply illegal and the only reasonable deduction is that you carry a gun because you want to use it - i.e. you are about to commit murder.

                Police violence against protesters is usually limited to water cannons and tear gas, maybe rubber bullets. Protester violence is rare, sometimes throwing rocks, maybe Molotov cocktails and burning cars.

                • Armok: God of Blood
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Police violence against protesters is usually limited to water cannons and tear gas, maybe rubber bullets. Protester violence is rare, sometimes throwing rocks, maybe Molotov cocktails and burning cars.

                  It’s the same in the US. The question is “How do you organize your protest such that the police won’t attempt to disperse/subdue you and give you a 5 year prison sentence?” The power the police (and the state in general) has is derived from their ability to commit violence without reprisal. That’s how it works in every country on Earth. The only meaningful way to deter them is to be organized in a way that says “We have protection. Fuck around and find out.”

                  I would assume the police would have the tools to fend off people using “mechanical weapons,” like bows, maces, spears, etc. They also have gas masks and the like to deal with chemical agents, like pepper spray. I’m not an advocate for using fire or explosives as a weapon, as they tend to cause too much collateral damage. So what else is there to be done than having a number of people carry around firearms, possibly loaded with less-than-lethal rounds (if they’re even legal), and hope that they won’t have to use them?

                  The reality of the situation, as far as I’m aware, is that the state has grown tired of people protesting. They’re sending out their goons to subdue people with violence (or the threat of violence) and ruin their lives with indefensibly-long prison sentences. Marching around completely defenseless while under this type of rule is pure folly.

    • Phoenixz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -32
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Please stop using that phrase. It’s now used by everyone and their grandmother to promote their little evil extremist shtick.

      We want gays and LGBT imprisoned or executed! If you don’t make my peaceful revolution possible you make a violent revolution inevitable!

      Edit: the paragraph above is an paraphrased example of how right wing extremists talk. I’ve hung around in conservative areas on reddit, and people quite literally talk like that.

      • @pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        39 months ago

        i don’t understand your second paragraph at all. sounds like you don’t know what peaceful means.

        • Phoenixz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          19 months ago

          My second paragraph was an example of how tight wing extremists use that very same phease.

          Its always "you have to adopt MY extremist and violent policies which I think are really peaceful, or I’ll threaten with a violent revolution

          • @pyre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            19 months ago

            but what do I give a shit if that’s not how I say it… like ok, so right wing cunts lie. not news… I’m telling the truth.

      • @Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        109 months ago

        You do know that Stonewall was a riot right? LGBT rights were not achieved by hanging some rainbow flags from a truck and drinking champagne in a topless outfit

      • @OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Let’s say we stop using that phrase. Everyone and their grandmother with evil extremist shticks keep using it.

        … how is that better?