I’d argue that the system shouldn’t automatically convert negative numbers to positive numbers. Instead, it should display an error to the user. Of course, that’s an abstract thought as I don’t know what was the system and who interacted with it.

Why do we need to know that the woman is massive? The title is strange.

It’s a common dictionary, which is probably not very good in this context. I think it would be more appropriate to refer to ISTQB, as it is likely the most relevant source when it comes to software testing and failures:

Human beings make errors (mistakes), which produce defects (faults, bugs), which in turn may result in failures. Humans make errors for various reasons, such as time pressure, complexity of work products, processes, infrastructure or interactions, or simply because they are tired or lack adequate training

Or to put it simple:

We’re seeing a failure here.

Sure. It’s better to develop this habit and use them automatically, without thinking. Sometimes there are no cars around, but pedestrians want to know your intentions too. And even if you don’t see anyone, it doesn’t mean there’s nobody around.

It’s just git isn’t good/perfect software. Best pieces of software are made within a week.

Why did it take six months to resolve the issue? What steps did you take, how did they respond? Serious claims require proper explanation at the very least.

Because people choose the easiest question to answer. You can’t change people, but you can change how you communicate.

passed

I too heard about such meetings. I’m yet to participate in one though.

That’s a bold assumption.

In megabytes or in m³?

ML in action.

Normal link: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/mar/31/marine-le-pen-barred-from-running-for-french-presidency-in-2027

Both things can be true because Germany is talking about risks in the upcoming 5 to 10 years, while this issue is relevant today.

That’s strange. A lot of people from Russia continue contributing on GitHub without any issues.

ICQ, MSN, Skype, and many others are laying on the cemetery, but IRC is still alive and active. Decentralized protocols ftw.

Please export your ignore list haha.

Source: General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine

Lol.

Thanks for your reply. The idea of zero-knowledge authentication is that the password never touches the server. Instead, the user can prove that they know the password when logging in by solving a challenge. This enables the user to log in from any new device without the need to transfer keys between them. I’ll take a closer look at your suggestions though. Thanks again!

Thanks, I will take a look! Implementing the encryption algorithm itself wasn’t my goal, I was hoping to find and reuse an existing library. You know, like we don’t implement our own algorithms to hash passwords or generate keys.