Too bad you can’t just draft military hardware.

I think the joke is that that is literally what coding, is.

Neat!

Welcome to lemmy!

No. We don’t know it, because the words you used don’t mean what you think they mean.

The sentence you were looking for, would have been “Jews who are literal nazis”.

The sentence you wrote refers to all jews, and deserves the downvotes it is getting.

lol

If you watch any interviews with Stubb, where he is asked about Trump, he gives answers that would please Trump.

But if you watch him talk about anything else, you can tell Stubb is way too smart to consider Trump anything other than a bumbling fool. It’s incredible that he’s able to clue people in, while even in person the idiot himself doesn’t realize.

He’s trying to walk the line of pleasing Trumps ego, while getting real work done.

He’s literally just been saying stuff along the line “here’s what president Trump needs to do (insert sane policy), but he’s so smart he doesn’t need me telling him that”.

And apparently it works.

Next, I’ll use a shotgun, and aim for my entire leg instead of just the foot!!

Who said anything about death?

Is it really “not nice” when something bad happening to a person, removing them from public policy, would be an objective improvement?

Most people have internal monologues.

It’s how we think things through, and usually the voice we hear, is our own. Which makes sense, because we can make it say whatever we like simply by thinking it.

But we often hear other peoples voices, too. Most common is probably the voice of a parent. You might imagine how they’ll sound when they scold you, if you think about doing something they won’t like.

It’s really not that weird that religious people claim to “hear” god. In the exact same way most people imagine what others would say in response to something they might say or do, the religious imagine how god or jesus might react.

But really, they’re just hearing their own mind frame their own thoughts in the way they picture that their religious icons might react to their thoughts and actions.

It’s not really a higher power speaking to them. They’re just interpreting the way the human mind works as supernatural, because their upbringing and belief system has them constantly asking themselves “what would god have me do” the same way we all ask “what would my friends and family have me do”.

There’s really no way to dispel this illusion, except by explaining internal monologues, and giving them time to think about it. You might also have the religious compare notes on what “god” is telling them, untill they dee how each of them hear whatever they would themselves imagine god would say. But this is something they really don’t like doing.

Huh. Is the bridge up to date and such?

For me it pretty much just works, has for like two years.

You can, but the reason you use a reverse proxy, isn’t revealing your IP or something, it’s that without it, the traffic is unencrypted.

As in, log in details and the contents of media streams are sent fully readable by any network node on the way.

You can try “login-qr” and scan the qr code you get with the telegram app.

Either way, you need to already be logged into telegram in the normal client to login using the bridge.

It’s not that kind of application. Federation would be massive overkill for a project like Mumble.

It’s a voip server and client for video gaming, with a couple adjacent features sprinkled in.

It doesn’t even really have accounts, and adding servers is just matter of configuring their IPs. What would you even use federation for?

Oh, it’s basic af. But it did what it needed to do, and still does, for some.

I havent used it in ages, I have no clue what sort of stuff continued development has enabled. If anything.

My friend group went first from Skype to the massively better TS3, and finally to Mumble. I don’t remember really missing anything.

I’ll agree to a cease fire, as long you promise to make absolutely no effort to figure out whether I’ll honor it.

Right…

There is also Mumble. TS3 era voip and text chat features, but it’s FOSS.

Now you’re just being deliberately obtuse. That’s not what the word “conscription” means, and I’m pretty sure you know that.

You’re just being an ass because a year of mandatory service is what the law uses conscription for in Finland, DURING PEACETIME.

In wartime, being unable to leave the country, forced to fight on the front lines, is also conscription.

Conscription, also known as the draft in American English, is the practice in which the compulsory enlistment in a national service, mainly a military service, is enforced by law.

“you cannot leave the country and will be kidnapped and forced to die a horrible death on the front lines”

When done by a state, that is literally still within the definition.

Good? No.

Normal? Absolutely not.

Justifiable? Arguably.

The way it’s actually happening? I don’t even know. You didn’t initially comment on that or the posted article, you commented on the general ability of a leader being able to send citizens to fight.

As horrifying as it is, and as someone who lives in a country where that question could become very relevant very suddenly, I think you’re wrong. The conclusion I came to, is that the ability for a nations government to “trade in” the few to save the many, is not optional, if continued long-term existence is desired.

You’re free to disagree on where the line for where that price is too great to pay in comparison to surrender, and you surely know better than I do where it is for Ukraine.

But it does exist. Countries the world over give their leaders the power to wield their human populations as a shield against threats. There is absolutely nothing unusual about that gruesome reality.

As for what I’m suggesting you look into, that would be the stuff you don’t get to see from a first-hand perspective. Statistics, large scale policy, international relations, industry and economic trends.

You’re presenting a distinction without a difference.

Both are effectively the same thing, a citizen pressed into service, against their will.

Jail-time is the best case scenario, and in no way intrinsic to the concept.

nazi past (and present)

oooook then