I don’t get that, what client are you using?

I wouldn’t be surprised if that is not the point.

Everyone is doing this. To be fair I don’t blame them. I ignore the titles and watch for the content.

Also, if only there could be more than one country stabbing the other in the back.

Yes. Policy is something to criticize politicians for. But he at least comes across as someone that draws the line at the destruction of the rule of law in USA and I guess that’s count for something.

New USA colonialism:

“Let us help you fight for your freedom!”

3 years later…

“Ekhmm… remember the aid we sent? It wasn’t to help you fight freedom after all. It was so now we can feel entitled to your resources.”

Check mate.

I DoNt geT tiReD oF wINing!

100% agreed. That is what I see, you can clearly see the line of the reflection of the rock. It is slightly darker due to Fresnel effect. The imperfection is most likely due to ripples of the water surface. The rest of the image also totally consistent with a picture of a lake or a pond beyond a fence.

This is just silly.

🤡

Also, as if many CEO’s and upper managements humanize their customers and not see them as numbers in a spreadsheet.

You didn’t answer the question brah.

/s

EDIT: Honestly, sometimes people don’t pick up sarcasm.

Elephants are also tired of those pesky tourists.

Sometimes they do, sometimes (most times probably) they don’t. However they don’t work 100% of the time if attempts are never made.

Yes, let’s make the poor people that cannot afford EV pay for emissions.

I thought that they were being a bit dramatic with the usage of “horror injuries”… I changed my minde after reading the article.

Absolutely devastating to her and the family and friends.

And on the left, dear children, we can see a species of an Iberic racist

At least ChatGPT will not flag the question as duplicate.

It is a term used by people that think that everything is a conspiracy theory. Most likely OC meant that comments here are payed shills of soft drinks companies trying to downplayed the significance of these news.

In reality, it’s full of reasonable people that don’t immediately jump on the boogieman bandwagon but simply critically look at the announcement and provide context for it so people don’t immediately stop consuming sugar-free consumables in favour of sugared ones as we know the latter to be deadly.

I really like this bot.

You call us insane but you don’t want to be harsh? I wonder what would you call people that are not panicking at even a possibility that anything personal becomes public if you were trying to be harsh.

On a more serious note, I am happy that people like you exist that care about privacy as it benefits everyone overall I guess. But you have to remember that some people, like me, don’t have issues with having their opinions and even some personal data public as long as we are aware that this is the case (which is how I treat all the social media).

For instance, durning my Reddit 7-year tenure I always wrote my comments in a way that if suddenly my employers or friend brought it up, I would not be ashamed of what I wrote.

I am not saying it’s not good to think and discuss about things like that but I would appreciate if you didn’t call people insane that have a very different attitude to you if it comes to internet privacy.

Some people freak out about internet privacy, GMO, sweeteners causing cancer, etc. There are others that don’t.