Yes, the thoughtless consumption of those zombies who… Want to learn how something is done instead of jusy going “oooh” and scrolling past?

Besides, the pics of food correspond more to a post of a description of an artwork rather than a post of an artwork itself. With food as the medium, you kinda gotta recreate it to appreciate it, much more than with digital art or even 3d objects.

For some kinds of physically painted art (think Rothko) you don’t exactly have to recreate it but even there the digital representations are not enough to convey what matters, for example because the physicality of the artifact matters too or because the context/arrangement adds its down dimension.

A picture of food is not food.

Interesting, to me, those points all except 4 would have made it look way worse.

If you want to do it right, the conclusions in evolutionary psychology are: -hard to get to (because just making up shit is not proper evidence, Santa Barbara church of evolutionary psychology…) -not as news sexy as that shit

Like, you can do stuff where you use phylogenetic history to make predictions about the prepotency of phobic stimuli, and that’ll be solid enough, but just screaming how your sexism is science is so much easier!

Nice, that’s a type of shot I still wanna get, too!

I mean… If I want to build a hell, I still want options.

Like, realistic space use for car hell would be interesting but maybe sometimes I wanna build a university on a hill and student housing at the top of a different hill and to get to class you have to bike up a hill both ways.

There’s many things I can overlook here but the lack of bikes nixed my hype fully. I don’t want to build car hell yet again. I can leave the house if I wanna see that.