Business says it doesn’t serve anyone who is armed

  • @expatriado@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -552 years ago

    businesses often give police discount to be in best terms in case they are needed, i know it shouldn’t be that way, but still you wouldn’t want to do the opposite

  • TherouxSonfeir
    link
    fedilink
    832 years ago

    That Oregon bakery who refused to sell to a gay wedding ended up winning in the appeal, so if you can say “no gays” you can say “no ______”

  • @Not_mikey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    172 years ago

    For some more context this place, reems, really isn’t a bakery so much as a middle eastern take out place. The main store is currently closed down though so the only place they have open is a counter serve food court style place in the ferry building, so the cops didn’t get kicked out of the place, they either went to the counter and the cashier refused to serve, or more likely, they saw the new policy online and threw a hissy fit without actually going.

    The founder is a Palestinian leftist, so this probably was targeted towards cops/military.

    I’d highly recommend going here if your on a tourist trip and end up in the ferry building, not just for the cop hate, but there wraps are great as well.

  • @flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    362 years ago

    If its legal for someone to hypothetically not create a wedding announcement website for gay people because she doesn’t want to serve those kinds of people, then there should be nothing wrong with not wanting to serve armed cops.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-rules-web-designer-refused-work-sex-weddings-rcna68629

    Baking food and making coffee could be argued to be every bit as “creative” as a website can be if the lawyer is good enough.

    • @Rediphile@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      202 years ago

      One is outright discrimination based on sexual orientation. The other is simply a policy applied to all patrons.

      It should absolutely be legal to say ‘no shoes no service’ or ‘has gun no service’ even if it was not legal to discriminate based on sexual orientation/race/gender/etc. They aren’t at all the same thing.

        • @cristo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          Esperanto
          12 years ago

          Not in San Fran they wont. They let criminals run rampant but wont let anyone without Trump money get through the concealed carry permit process. Bruen should have fixed that but who knows if Cali will actually listen with Newsom putting that constitutional amendment to neuter the 2nd amendment out there.

  • @foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    22
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Does this police chief have beef with the MLB, NFL, NBA, NHL, MLS, and every other major sports organization?

    None of them allow firearms on site unless you are on duty

      • @foggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        Welp they’re gonna catch a massive fine, and their whole security staff is going to hate their jobs for the next few years.

    • @ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      It’s not like they check for concealed carry though. I did security checks for a MLB team for a bit and I definitely waved through guns after they flashed a badge.

  • Lifted_lowered
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82 years ago

    Based bakery. If the sporting goods store where they bought the piece makes people not carry and they respect that then they should respect other stores that ask people not to.

  • vlad
    link
    fedilink
    182 years ago

    Sure, they should be able to turn anyone away, no questions asked.

      • @SocialEngineer56@notdigg.com
        link
        fedilink
        172 years ago

        Is being a law enforcement officer a protected class?

        Saying something like “I refuse to serve you in the basis of your race” is illegal because race is a protected class. Whereas “I refuse to serve you because your Lemmy hit-takes are dumb” is perfectly legal! Same as refusing to serve armed thugs masquerading as the good guys.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          I just had a situation with this at work that I talked to my wife about. A customer wanted us to do something with an image that had full frontal nudity and my bosses had to have a discussion about whether or not to allow it. My wife said, “aren’t they required to?” I pointed out that if that was true, we wouldn’t be able to refuse Neo-Nazis.

      • stopthatgirl7OP
        link
        fedilink
        192 years ago

        …Yeah, do you realize how bad taste it is to compare not letting cops in to Jim Crow discrimination against Black folks? Y’know, the people cops kill a lot?

        I see what you’re trying to do, but…can you please not.

  • @afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -132 years ago

    We have had a surprising high number of bakery related controversies. I think I will continue to shop at my local supermarket bakery. I want a cake not to have to make a statement.

    • sik0fewl
      link
      fedilink
      72 years ago

      And surgically replace them with bear arms, which is constitutionally protected!

  • Throwaway
    link
    fedilink
    52 years ago

    Its fair. Bakers shouldn’t have to serve anyone, for any reason or no reason.

  • BaroqueInMind
    link
    fedilink
    102 years ago

    There is no debate, the bakery is private property. Fuck off pigs. Also please immediately respond if I call 911 kthxbye

    • @nxdefiant@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      92 years ago

      yes and also yes. They have a job they agreed to do, and fuck them right off into the unemployment line if that hurts their feelings.