In many parts of Europe, it’s common for workers to take off weeks at a time, especially during the summer. Envious Americans say it’s time for the U.S. to follow suit.

Some 66% of U.S. workers say companies should adopt extended vacation policies, like a month off in August, in their workplaces, according to a Morning Consult survey of 1,047 U.S. adults.

  • Pyr
    link
    fedilink
    222 years ago

    My cousins from Holland just came to Canada for a 6 week vacation. Can’t imagine just up and leaving work for 6 weeks in a row. Would be great, but also the workplace would probably fall apart lol.

    • @daanzel@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      112 years ago

      Dutchie here; while this certainly happens, it’s not the norm at all. Everyone working full time in the Netherlands gets a minimum of 20 paid days off per year. Many companies increase this to 25-ish days, with some outliers going up to 40+. At my company, taking >2 weeks has to be requested far in advance and planned around. If my prolonged leave would cause the workplace to fall apart, it wouldn’t get approved.

      That said, yea it’s definitely better here in Europe regarding vacations :)

      • @iawia@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        Of course, if one employee being away would cause a company to fall apart, us Dutch would conclude management is completely incompetent, and tell them that.

        A 3 week vacation is pretty normal, here. But we do plan those ahead. That means you might not be able to take it on the specific dates you have in mind. But not that you won’t be able to take it!

        • @SheeEttin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          if one employee being away would cause a company to fall apart, us Dutch would conclude management is completely incompetent, and tell them that

          Here in the US, some people say they can’t take time off like they’re proud of it somehow. Maybe it’s just Stockholm syndrome.

          • @UID_Zero@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            42 years ago

            I took a week off and saw emails upon my return that they almost called me about a security issue, but implemented alternative mitigations.

            Jokes on them, I would not have answered. It’s not my fault that I’m a single point of failure in the org. I don’t roll over and take that shit.

    • @PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      That’s just criminal. They need to hire more. The railroads have also been removing rail from primary corridor despite increasing freight traffic. Super dumb. The Industry will implode.

  • @machsna@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    252 years ago

    In Switzerland, on the other hand, we have turned down an additional two weeks of vacation with a majority of 67 % in 2012. Which leaves us with a meager 4 weeks.

  • Maple Engineer
    link
    fedilink
    82 years ago

    The US company I work for offers unlimited vacation whch is a means for a company to avoid the financial liability of an entitlement to leave. That is illegal in Canada so for Candian employees we have unlimited vacation with a minimum of four weeks.

      • @dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        “Unlimited PTO” is just a scheme for companies to not have to keep track of PTO owed to the employee (and not have to pay unused days out when they leave). It’s generally a raw deal for the employee.

        In a company with traditional PTO, an employee could save up 4 weeks, and with adequate planning, take it all at once, even in the US. Their manager might grouse if it is near a key deadline, but if the employee has the time banked up it will generally get accepted. But in a company with unlimited PTO, the employee doesn’t have that documented evidence that they have been saving PTO, and the manager has more leeway to reject the request if it is at an inconvenient time.

  • •••
    link
    fedilink
    292 years ago

    I’m gonna assume the remaining 33% prefer to have a vacation other than summertime.

  • teft
    link
    fedilink
    182 years ago

    Congress does it. If it’s good enough for the ruling class it should be good enough for the rest of us.

    • @BossDj@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      152 years ago

      30ish percent of Americans identify as Republican (depending on the poll), so these types of questions are always ~66% of Americans in support

      • @GiddyGap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        112 years ago

        But many independent voters who want these policies vote for Republicans. If they want these policies, voting for Republicans will not get them there.

      • @GiddyGap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        72 years ago

        These things require 60 votes in the Senate and approval in the House. Republicans are blocking them in both.

      • @markr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        Nominally in power. In reality Congress is deadlocked and has been since his term started,and the USSC has aggressively blocked just about everything he has attempted via executive orders.

        We need a lot more center left democrats in office, at the state and federal level, to get any significant reforms passed. That also means getting the geriatric Clinton era neoliberal democrats out of office.

  • @amenotef@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    182 years ago

    The OOO full August sucks because every near touristic place is crowded and 2+ times more expensive.

    I never pick August. But my company doesn’t force me to pick August either.

    • @lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      Why would they force you to pick August?

      Here vacation is most commonly from mid July to mid August, but some people obviously have it earlier or later out of choice or necessity.

      Manuy jobs can’t be completely unmanned for 1+ months so vacations are often spread out slightly if possible.

      • @amenotef@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Many companies in Europe encourage you to take in August because the work is less in some regions and the majority take them during August.

        They can’t pick all your annual days. But sometimes like 50% of them.

        I generally try to take mine during November or March.

        Sometimes December because I have to pick 3 days between Christmas and New Year as policy.

        • @gazter@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          I’m not a fan of companies picking any of my time off.

          “This office shuts down over the Christmas/New Year period, so don’t come in, take your holidays. Oh but there’s a job that needs to be done on the 28th so you’ll need to come in for that.”

          Ummm… It’s not really my holiday if I don’t have control over it. What you’re describing there isn’t even leave without pay. It’s just a period of no work.

          • @amenotef@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            Yeah me neither. Which is why I’m OK with my current contract which blocks only 3 out of 23/24~ paid time off on December, as a general rule.

            In my previous company it was hassle the process to ask for not taking any time off in August (or around August).

  • @mx_smith@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    I used to live and work in Washington DC and that place shuts down in August, as all the politicians vacay at that time.

    • @rusticus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      152 years ago

      That’s because Americans have no say in these issues. They’re brainwashed (well, 1/2 is) to think those things are sOciAliSm, which apparently is bad despite many voters having socialized medicine that they love. It’s the American way, convincing people that what they want is not in their best interest.

    • Franzia
      link
      fedilink
      72 years ago

      The only way to vote for these issues is to vote to form a union.

    • Because the American Oligarchy do nothing to actually improve the lives of the average person and deflect, blame, and fear monger against the other party to distract from their own corruption. It’s both sides of the political spectrum in this country and it’s getting pretty old.

    • @Furbag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      222 years ago

      The overwhelming majority of working class adults want these things, but also the overwhelming majority of working class adults also work for large corporations who do not want these things (because it costs them money/profits). Guess who has more money to buy off politicians? Walmart/Amazon/Target would work together to never let these beneficial policies go through congress. It would be worth it to them to spend literal billions to prevent it, because it would cost them billions in the long run.

      The sad reality is we don’t really live in a democracy. It’s an oligarchy that allows us to think we are in control.

      • @Dass93@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        I have never understood why Americans doesn’t have trade union?

        Like in Denmark we have trade unions where a working area is united like the health care area, have “FOA” there is trading “time off” payment and so on, for all in this area.?

        • @jugalator@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          6
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          There are trade unions in the USA but the cultural difference compared to in a Scandinavian country is very striking, both in terms of American vs Scandinavians unions themselves but also their support. It would surprise many Scandinavians to learn that many Americans don’t even want trade unions because it’s for example commonly seen as that they interfere with career paths, promoting seniority at the cost of new blood or keep the wages low because individual wages can be affected.

          I think the culture collision here is that the whole idea behind unions in Scandinavia is to offer a stronger collective voice and bargaining actor to increase wages and other subjects that improves the standards and quality of life / motivation of their employees so that the relationship between the work place and the individual is less asymmetrical.

          But it’s been a long journey and it still is even if unionizing in USA has seen an uptick in debates lately, because USA has a radical and capitalistic history where there are loud and influential voices that even asking for basic rights on a job can be seen as “greed” and the company looks for someone being less of a bother and not asking these questions instead. All due to weak unions, of course. Otherwise the company would of course lose too much in employee skills by excluding everyone having these demands (and already being union members) like the situation here in Scandinavia where this by consequence is simply not an option.

          This is at least my two cents of this entire situation from the “outside” also in Europe, please correct me if I’m wrong…

    • FlashMobOfOne
      link
      fedilink
      18
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      98% of the people who vote are voting for repressive corporate culture.

      The people who don’t vote can’t afford to miss a day of work, and even if they did, they know the people they have to choose from won’t do anything to change it.

      Therefore these polls are meaningless.

    • candyman337
      link
      fedilink
      452 years ago

      That’s because politicians are so far separated from the average American. Some of them are so old and senile and have been in power so long, they don’t even realize how bad it is for the average American, and on top of that, because they don’t think it’s as bad as it is, they don’t care.

        • candyman337
          link
          fedilink
          42 years ago

          I’d say it depends but the older ones are more likely to be influenced by money

      • @madcaesar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        132 years ago

        We don’t have these things because 50% of the population is dumb as bricks and is voting against their own interest.

        • candyman337
          link
          fedilink
          92 years ago

          It’s not even 50% tits our fucked up districts, and also it’s gotten like this because of legislation to defund education. But younger voters are becoming more informed, change can happen. It will take effort and time though.

          • @jasondj@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            182 years ago

            Hey man if there’s one thing the defunded schools taught me, it’s that America is the greatest country in the universe.

            • Altima NEO
              link
              fedilink
              52 years ago

              So I stood up and told that teaching lady, “the only letters I need to know are U, S, and A!”

      • Square Singer
        link
        fedilink
        02 years ago

        No. It’s because the constitution effective abolishes democracy, by ensuring a two-party system.

        In the US democracy is limited to one coin toss worth of decision making once every four years. Add to that that their first-to-the-post system eliminates all election power to non-swing-states, that means ~40 of the states have no democratic input at all, and the rest has up to 15 bit worth of democratic input over their whole life time.

        Thus politicians have nothing to fear at all. They mess up, who cares? It’s gonna be their turn after the next term limit anyway.

        • candyman337
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          The Constitution doesn’t employ a 2 party system and actually our founding fathers were against it. It has been put in place since then. I do think the electoral college system does cause issues though. We need a ranked choice system or something else where all votes have some value.

      • @Adalast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        I have always wished that requiring congressmen work a minimum wage job in their district that they have to look for and apply to like the rest of us while out of session would do anything. Deal with some Karens to humble them properly.

    • @Arsenal4ever@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      112 years ago

      The think tanks funded by rich people saying “They want to take away your guns/cows/statues etc” and “unions suck” are better at this than we are.

      We can want all we want, but a whole pile of the media is owned by the 1% and what they want is the status quo.

      Conservatism is literally, don’t change anything.

  • @Jagermo@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    432 years ago

    I know lots of us people with “unlimited time off” type contracts. No one ever takes more than a week because they are afraid that their bosses wouldnt like it.

      • @HellAwaits@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        Yeah, they’re so afraid to unionize that…they unionized in Starbucks, UPS, railroads, hospitals, maintenance management…

      • @agent_flounder@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        192 years ago

        For some that’s true.

        But we undergo a great deal of brainwashing. Unions are demonized, billionaires lionized, puritanical (insane) work ethic lauded, anything less than that vilified, etc.

        Attempts at unionization are aggressively subverted and crushed by large corpos.

        And most people are given just enough to not want to risk it all to get a bit more.

        It will be a while, yet, before US culture shifts enough that more people side with unions, join unions, and build critical mass. Although, younger generations seem to be more aware of the anti-labor BS more than my gen (x) was at a similar age.

    • @rdrunner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      92 years ago

      I have unlimited PTO, and it’s a total scam. I’m a contractor, and contracts have required hours within required time-frames. These time-frames don’t have margin for taking off a couple weeks at a time. Any time you take off, has to be made up, so it’s not really time off

    • If I’m stuck in the USA, I’m gonna find an unlimited time of job and actually use that benefit like Europeans. Fuck American work culture.

      • @AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        122 years ago

        I’m sure you’ll keep that job for several months. The other part of American “work culture” is how quickly and easily we can lose that job. Be happy that you have some worker protection

        • @Jagermo@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          82 years ago

          In Germany, you get at least 28 days of holidays per year. Company even has to budget for them, so if you don’t take them, it creates a huge headache for them in regards to finalizing their yearly results because they might have to keep money back. Sorry, I don’t have the correct economical term, in German it is a Rückstellung. So there is a very high insentive to get all of your people to take their holidays, because otherwise it’s a pain in the ass and will delay everything.

          • @lud@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            Does Germany also have a maximum amount of days an employee can save before they are legally required to take them out?

    • @toynbee@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      92 years ago

      I’ve been told that generally, this is so the company doesn’t have to pay you back for unused PTO if you leave the company.

      I can’t vouch for this as true, but it makes sense.

      • @marron12@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        It can be to limit how much vacation time the company has to pay out on separation, or to limit how much “liability” for vacation pay they have on the books at any given time. If your employees get 5 days of vacation a year, use it or lose it, you don’t have to deal with someone who (the horror!) has built up 2 weeks and wants to use it all at once.

        There are no state or federal laws that give employees a right to paid vacation time. Only 10 states require the company to pay out unused vacation time when you leave (CA, CO, IL, IN, LA, MA, ME, ND, NE, RI). In most of those states, use it or lose it policies are illegal. Everywhere else, the company policy basically decides if it gets paid out or not.

    • @_Sc00ter@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      122 years ago

      My company has this and just about everyone I work with utilizes the unlimited time off. Most people land in the 5-6 weeks of vacation a year + sick + personal business + holidays.

      There are the few who make work their hobby too, but you can’t do anything for those people IMO

        • @_Sc00ter@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          Personal business is for things that need to be done touring business hours but aren’t vacation. Things like doctors appointments, meeting a service person to fix something at your home, or some delivery that requires you be home. Those kind of things

        • @AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          A lot of the time the difference is in how much notice you need to give work before taking the time off.

          Sometimes they are treated different for expirations as well. For example, accrued vacation time usually has to be paid if you leave, might have some or all rollover to the be next year, while other types of time off are more likely use it or lose it

    • @markr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      Yeah because it’s a fucking scam who’s primary purpose is to eliminate pto liability from their accounting. It’s the equivalent of the 401k scam that eliminated corporate pension plans as a standard benefit.

      • Bo7a
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        I am definitely an outlier here. We have unlimited PTO and 98% of our workforce is in the US so most people never take more than three or four days at a time. And often end up at the end of the year having taken less PTO than they would have as a regular hourly worker.

        But not me… I’ll take 3 weeks at a time if I have plans. They can fire me if they want. I have a nice 3 months worth of severance written into my contract if they are the ones who terminate it.

        That would give me a month more of break and then 2 months to find a job.

        I know this isn’t possible for everyone. But if more people stood up for themselves, even within the confines of these contracts, we would all be better off as management and executive get used to it over time.

    • @AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      If you get such a contract, make sure to read it closely. I had it once, phrased more like “there is no policy restricting time off”. It’s really up to your manager and it means there is an invisible limit that may be different for everyone, you won’t know about until you hit it.

      In my case, I had a good manager, but sure enough, got dinged after taking off two weeks in the year (the worst part was no actual vacation but individual days off for kid’s appointments). I much prefer an actual limit, because then you can take it

  • Tug
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    We want it, but won’t take the necessary steps to procure it.

  • @technopagan@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    272 years ago

    German here: I have yet to witness these “European-style” vacations mentioned in the post title.

    Most workplaces seem to frown at people taking >2 consecutive weeks of vacation, esp. if they don’t have kids and do it in main travel season / during school holidays. Handing in ~3 weeks of holidays often at least needs some kind of explanation to the team-lead, e.g. “I have school kids who have their summer holidays and we need to keep them busy until school starts again.”

    I have yet to see a single company going easy on someone saying “I’ll be off all of August KTHXBYE”.