• h3doublehockeysticks [she/her]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    732 years ago

    The nazis hosted the olympics, no imperialist war has ever stopped the olympics from letting someone compete. Even in the worst possible interpretation of Russia’s actions in Ukraine, barring them from the Olympics for it would be an entirely new precedent.

      • Fuckass [none/use name]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Lol but western athletes aren’t fascists for not boycotting the event that Russia participating in? Seems like they have more power and influence than an internet poster

      • autismdragon [he/him, comrade/them]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        282 years ago

        Y’all will take the most lukewarm, neutral, fair takes on topics related to this issue and call it “support for Russia” is incredible. |

        Nowhere, anywhere in op’s comment did she say that she supports Russia.

      • h3doublehockeysticks [she/her]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        132 years ago

        It feels weird to be the one to break this to you, but the nazis are widely considered to be fascists too. Some would say they were even a lil bit worse than Russia on the goosestepping front.

    • Cethin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 years ago

      The last several Olympics haven’t they competed under a different flag because all the cheating they keep getting caught for? Sure, everyone knows they’re Russian, but it wasn’t the Russian flag or anthem. They competed as the Russian Olympic Committee.

  • 7bicycles [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    602 years ago

    Putting a lot of trust in some notion of integrity on noted good organisation, the IOC, here

  • @Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    672 years ago

    Good lord, the comments on that article. I guess I shouldn’t expect any better from RT, but man it does really make me sad that so many people are happy living in a fantasy world where Ukrainians are the bad guys in this conflict.

      • Warrior of Ukraine
        link
        fedilink
        -282 years ago

        OK and? How many Europeans have died in the said ‘conflict’? Russia has declared war against Europe and will not stop until the last European is dead.

        • Echo Dot
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          That is going to require them to train their military or something. So I’m guessing it might be easier for them to just wait a couple of thousand years until all of Europe is underwater as it will be faster.

          • ArxCyberwolf
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            Plans have been discovered that Russia intended to invade other countries including Moldova and the other surrounding eastern European countries once they were done with Ukraine. Putin had no plans to stop his conquest, he wants to rebuild the Soviet Union.

        • @rjs001@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          -52 years ago

          Good. I hope to see the EU and the country of “Ukraine” removed from the map. The world will know peace further than it does now if Russia were able to do that

          • @PerCarita@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            02 years ago

            I think this is a bad faith reading of the other comment. Perhaps Warrior of Ukraine meant that they’re European, and as such is more emotionally and intellectually invested in the war in Ukraine than in the ongoing conflict of non-Europeans (which you rightly identified as “people too”, of course) in Palestine/Israel.

            • @Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              112 years ago

              And I think I absolutely correctly read “Who cares about those people, they’re not Europeans”, and the quotes about the word conflict were just a cherry on top. The correct answer to whatabout is not “we should only care about my issue because I am important and you are less than that”.

              • @PerCarita@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 years ago

                I didn’t see that intention. Perhaps u/JackBruh@lemm.ee would come back and clarify his intent. Otherwise, I largely agree with you. Whataboutism makes it as if when you care about one thing, you have to care about every thing, but no one person can fix every thing. It makes cynics of us all

    • @rjs001@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      -62 years ago

      Ukraine is the bad guy as they are fascist dictators who will (hopefully) be a former country in the future

  • Fuckass [none/use name]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    682 years ago

    Finally, some dignity and respect for human rights at the Olympics.

    walks past barricade that hides homeless people

    • uralsolo [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      192 years ago

      Every Olympics (and world cup) presages the mass brutalization of vulnerable people, and I gotta wonder: do people really care that much about shotput?

  • mihor
    link
    fedilink
    -22 years ago

    Good riddance to Europe’s karens, then.

  • @TheMage@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    222 years ago

    Now we’re up to $900 per US household for this Ukraine stuff. Let’s throw a few more bucks at it to buy flags. Great use of taxpayer dollars. Sure, Jan.

    • @PerCarita@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 years ago

      Most of which are armament that the US government already had in its arsenal. You’ve spent the money and now those missiles are actually in use instead of being hold in storage. I’m actually more interested in that 900 USD amount, where did you read or hear that exact number?

      • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        462 years ago
        1. Missiles being used to kill people in an endless stalemate is actually worse than them sitting in a box
        2. The people sending those missiles to Ukraine are going to buy more to replace them
        3. They’re also going to charge Ukraine for the missiles and insist the country sell off state assets for pennies on the dollar to make payments
      • PosadistInevitablity [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        And now we have to replenish those arsenals… they absolutely will be replenished.

        Like, if you give all the food in your cupboard to someone, no one would consider that “free”. You have to buy more food!

        This argument seems so foolish I can hardly believe anyone actually thinks this way.

        • @PerCarita@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          I’d rather the companies in my country stop selling those armaments to the US, actually. Maybe this is a good time to review your military budget and ask your government why you have it in the first place?

          • PosadistInevitablity [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            The same imperial government that lied to its people and provoked a land war in Europe?

            The same one you’re legitimizing in fueling that conflict by implying it’s free?

            Yeah let me call up my boy Biden and tell him no more bombs while you point and laugh at me from behind

      • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        422 years ago

        I don’t know how this brain genius talking point got so popular.

        So things don’t cost money when you already spent money on them? …You don’t think those stocks are going to be replenished having been depleted?

        • @PerCarita@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Because it has a point, albeit not perfect. Wouldn’t you rather the US not have a ridiculously big military budget and can divert spending to, say, education and healthcare?

          Sure, it’s great that the US arsenal can obliterate any country in the world should the political powers will it, but this is not the best version of the world, honestly. As you said, it’s your money. Are you okay with it?

          • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            72 years ago

            Sure, it’s great that the US arsenal can obliterate any country in the world should the political powers will it

            visible-disgust

            Wouldn’t you rather the US not have a ridiculously big military budget and can divert spending to, say, education and healthcare?

            Yes? But this seems like a non sequitur.

    • tired_n_bored
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      This Ukraine stuff is a war where 100.000 war crimes were reported, tens of thousands of civilians were killed raped and tortured, where hundreds of thousands of people lost their house.

      I wouldn’t say it’s $900 per household because

      1. It’s from the defense federal budget, that you would’ve spent anyways
      2. The aid packages, expressed in dollars, are the sum of the value of the equipment sent to Ukraine, in vast majority which US already had
      3. The defence budget is there to be able to stand against the strongest adversaries: China and Russia. USA basically annihilated one of their enemies’ army without a single drop of blood.
      • mihor
        link
        fedilink
        -62 years ago

        You must be joking, 100K war crimes??? 10K rapes??? This isn’t Rwanda.

        • ArxCyberwolf
          link
          fedilink
          -12 years ago

          You haven’t heard of hyperbole, clearly. But it’s not far from the truth. Russia commits war crimes every day. It’s all their military is good for. They can’t fight a real force, so they blow up and murder civilians instead. To claim otherwise is misinformed at best, actively dishonest at worst.

          • mihor
            link
            fedilink
            -42 years ago

            Ok, Jen! 😂 I guess those leopards and bradleys blew up by themselves…

              • mihor
                link
                fedilink
                -52 years ago

                You mean the one that Ukrainian Mi-17 fell on to? Or the one hit by an AD Ukrainian missile? 🤷🏼

                • tired_n_bored
                  link
                  fedilink
                  0
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  No, I mean this this, this, this and more. Thank you, have a nice day.

                  P.S. Let’s not forget about the killing of innocent civilians in Bucha with their hands handcuffed

            • tired_n_bored
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Why do you think the Ukrainians are Nazi? You’re clearly failing to understand that having a Nazi problem (like any country) does not imply the government is Nazi. You have seen images of men with their tattooed arms right? How does it mean that the government is Nazi? It’s Kremlin’s propaganda to discredit Ukrainians. Go see the polls and see how many far-right parties got (2%).

              I linked a Wikipedia page, so there’s no need to “believe” as the war crimes are documented.

              Now look at who’s committing genocide, deportations and tortures.

              • @rjs001@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                12 years ago

                They let Nazis in the government through the Azov are in the military and allow Nazis in the military. That is the government.

    • @couragethebravedog@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      This conflict has the potential to cause real change in Russia. We’re talking about potentially getting rid of Putin’s regime and it’s being done without sending any of our troops to die. The help Ukraine is getting isn’t charity, look at the bigger picture.

      • Venus [she/her]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        652 years ago

        without sending any of our troops to die

        hitler-detector what about all the people from other countries

      • TheBroodian [none/use name]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        382 years ago

        You do realize that America already overthrew Russia’s government once, and that is how Putin came to be in the first place, right? You expect cycle #2 to go better?

      • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        262 years ago

        We’re talking about potentially getting rid of Putin’s regime and it’s being done without sending any of our troops to die.

        The people surrounding Putin who are most likely to replace him are hardliners who think Kiev should be glassed. Part of the motivation behind the Wagner mutiny is Prigo thinking Shoigu isn’t going hard enough in Ukraine. Contrary to liberal bots who only listen to what CNN tells them, it’s good for everyone involved that the Wagner mutiny was completely deflated. There wouldn’t be much of a Ukraine left if Prigo was in charge, and Prigo is not the only one.

      • Tankiedesantski [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        43
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        If Putin is overthrown the people most likely to overthrow him are hardliners who think he’s being a cuck by not immediately nuking Kiev and Washington.

        So it’s a good thing that there’s basically zero indication of major internal political stability in Russia. Even the Wagner “coup” only asked for Shoigu and Gerasimov to be removed, not Putin.

      • PosadistInevitablity [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        27
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Putin has more support than ever…

        For gods sake try to imagine this from a Russian perspective. NATO bombs are killing their people.

        Like, seriously, imagine how your average American would react to this. Treat the Russians as human for one fucking second.

        They are not going to fucking blame Putin for that. They will blame NATO!!!

      • Fuckass [none/use name]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        35
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Lmao. I’m sure they’ll overthrow the government, just like the Americans did to their own government after invading Vietnam and Iraq. Have you seen what the Russian government is doing to mild protestors? Black bagged, sent off to who knows where, doing who knows what. It’s Kent State by like 500x. This isn’t 1980s USSR. The people there support Putin. And those who don’t and protest are still denounced by the west for not doing enough, as if westerners have ever succeeded in holding their governments accountable.

        The most realistic outcome is that Putin resigns in disgrace and 20 years later they make shoot and cry movies about Russian soldiers in Ukraine. And then they’ll rehabilitate Putin as a strong leader anyway.

  • @derf82@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    692 years ago

    Forget neutral flags, they should be banned. Heck, Russia should be banned for doping, regardless of the war.

  • @Gsus4@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    162 years ago

    Go Ukraine, but it’s official, this worldnews community has become ragebait, like the original one :/

    • @steltek@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      72 years ago

      It’s particularly upsetting because lemmy.ml is a major instance. IMO, moderation in this c/ is infrequent and underwhelming. I don’t mean to hang the mods out to dry; it would take a big team to wade through this effluent and tame the trolls. The hostile “Here comes the Reddit refugees” and “OMG Tankie brigade” shit is just the easy stuff. A rule on lazy whataboutism would help the signal/noise ratio as well. This post is from RT, about Ukraine/Russia/Belarus but the biggest thread in here is rehashing the Iraq occupation. Can we just discuss the original topic? Is that so hard?

      • Sasuke [comrade/them]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        This post is from RT, about Ukraine/Russia/Belarus but the biggest thread in here is rehashing the Iraq occupation.

        the ‘punishment’ of russia is night and day to what we saw happen to the US and its western allies after the invasion of iraq. you can go and cry about ‘whataboutism’ as much as you’d like, but those of us who live in a world not shrouded by a willful amnesia of a past historical events can see the gross display of hypocrisy for what it is—namely a confirmation by the western world that some victims (of war) are worth more than others

      • Dee
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        This post is from RT, about Ukraine/Russia/Belarus but the biggest thread in here is rehashing the Iraq occupation. Can we just discuss the original topic? Is that so hard?

        This is why so many instances defederate from hexbear, they do this in every comment section. Just turn it into whataboutism against the US, and add nothing to the topic that’s actually being discussed by the article. They’re basically lemmygrad but brigade comment sections more often.

        • @zephyreks@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          -12 years ago

          Instances defederate from hexbear because of emoji spam more than anything else.

          Defederation because of political views is, frankly, dangerous for democracy.

          • @steltek@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            02 years ago

            Re: “dangerous for democracy”. That’s a little hyperbolic, don’t ya think?

            I don’t support defederation. I think the calls for defederation strictly arise from political clashes that boil out of control and people that don’t remember the Internet-that-was, before Reddit. “Free speech absolutist” wasn’t a thing because no one pictured their little forum as mattering that much. Forum moderation wasn’t about enforcing a specific world view or preserving an echo chamber, it was about preserving civil discourse. And since I’m typing this out I might as well add that I think if I was to dust off an early 90’s or 2000’s mod hat, I’d do the following:

            • Referring to other commenters as reddit refugee/hexbear/liberal/grad/imperialist/shill/anti-westerner 's is a 3 day ban
            • Bringing up the Iraq War, Tienanmen Sq, etc is a 3 day ban. Not some conspiracy to bury the truth. It’s because everyone’s friggin’ heard it already and we definitely don’t need more of it.
            • Lazy whataboutism is a 1 day ban. This is vaguely defined for a purposeful chilling effect.
            • War Is Bad. When not the topic of the article, fantasizing about a US-Ruso conflict/popular uprising/Taiwan invasion/WW3 is a 1 day ban.

            What do people want this place to be? A place where all sides can meet (if they strictly behave)? An echo chamber? A raging angry gladiator pit? Like I said above, as a major Lemmy instance, this place should be downright boring and the extremists can retreat to other instances better suited to their anger.

          • Dee
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            This isn’t about their political views in particular, this is about them brigading comment sections and derailing from the original topic and shouting down anybody who disagrees.

            Defederation because of political views is, frankly, dangerous for democracy.

            What? This is such a ridiculous claim I’m not even sure where to start. Federation does not equal democracy, and defederation from a shitty spammy instance has zero impact on democracy.

            • @zephyreks@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              Democracy is built on discourse of opposing views. If we just censor all opposing views, then what the fuck is even the point?

              • @steltek@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                32 years ago

                There’s about as much discourse here as rival football hooligans having it out in the streets. A lot of violence but it doesn’t really change the score. What’s the point of talking when no one’s listening?

                • @zephyreks@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  02 years ago

                  Yet, people with these political views do exist in our society. We need to find a way to integrate them into society, not isolate them.

              • ArxCyberwolf
                link
                fedilink
                32 years ago

                Defederation is not censorship. All it means is that nobody on that instance wants to hear your bullshit, and are showing you the door. You’re able to make an account on another federated instance if you wanted to hear those vitriolic, harmful people.

            • ArxCyberwolf
              link
              fedilink
              32 years ago

              And also don’t forget the mass spam of oversized emojis and pictures of pigs shitting.

        • ArxCyberwolf
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          Brigading is their entire purpose for existence on this site, they actively plot to harass and invade other instances to deny people a platform and talk about where to spread their “forces” next. They were taking bets on where they’ll be defederated next. They were never on this platform to participate in good faith.

      • GarbageShoot [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        432 years ago

        “My post is about black crime, stop mentioning other things like white crime. Yes, I only post about black crime, are you trying to say black people never commit crime? That they should be allowed to commit crime? Thought so.”

        Sometimes bringing up context is important for discussing issues that some people would like to keep in a vacuum. The US competing at those same Olympic games under no penalty would be fucked up and makes it obvious that if Belarus was penalized here, it would be due to western politicking and nothing else (Russia already has the doping issue, so idk about that one)

        • @steltek@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          -22 years ago

          No, you’re not helping. At all. It’s flamebait that can only derail the topic and turn into a circle jerk or verbal fistfight.

          Here’s an example that may help: Why is China allowed to participate in the Olympics despite their genocides and brutal crackdowns? Why the double standard?

            • @Apollo@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              62 years ago

              I’m sure china is rounding up its citizens and putting them into reeducation camps based on their ethnicity and religious beliefs for reasons other than ethnic cleansing.

              Being left wing doesn’t mean you absolutely must support china, especially since a lot of chinese policies are decidedly right wing and almost overwhelmingly authoritarian.

              Like nost other “communist” parties in power before them, the CCP is populated mostly by self interested bourgeois that coopted the revolution and pursued a path of oppression against its own people.

              Authoritarians gonna authoritate, who’d have guessed.

            • @Emanuel@lemmy.eco.br
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              https://xinjiangahr.carrd.co/

              Saved. Thanks for the comprehensive resource. Now, if only everyone was eager to read before slandering other countries online… Not that China is a perfect utopia, but simply gobbling whatever information comes to the public by media that have an interest in defending “the West” is the quickest path to have your consent manufactured.

      • Buelldozer
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Can we just discuss the original topic? Is that so hard?

        When your entire schtick is anti-westernism then yeah it is that hard. I really don’t mind the comrades at lemmy.ml and lemmygrad.ml, they generate some thought provoking content at times. However their blind, predictable, and endlessly repeated talking points are tiresome in the same way that an invasion of Fox News viewers would be.

        • o_d [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          72 years ago

          Another centerist attempting to equivicate the left who wants civil rights for all to the right who want to melt anyone the left advocates civil rights for. Yes, your rainbow capitalism will certainly save this planet.

      • @Gsus4@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        It’s not this, it’s this whole subreddit. Might as well call it world_politics_gore_debate_bait.

        Edit: to the stink bugs trying to dunk on me for doing exactly what I wanted to do when referring to this place looking like the worldnews subreddit, look up “metaphor” in a dictionary and stfu

        • Dee
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          subreddit

          🫤

          Edit: You ever see somebody say something dumb and then they unabashedly double down? Yeah.

          • @Gsus4@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            -2
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Look up “metaphor” in a dictionary and stop doubling down on your mistaken shallow interpretation of what you just read.

            • Dee
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              Trying to say calling a Lemmy community a subreddit is a metaphor lmao

              Also, you came back to the comments without getting a notification to reply to the edit? Dude, go outside lol

              • @Gsus4@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                -3
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                Here, I’ll do it for you:

                https://www.grammarly.com/blog/metaphor/

                Work today was a nightmare!

                You: no, nightmares are not real life, you’re wrong.

                You are my shining star.

                You: There are no stars on Earth, you’re a moron and I’m dumping you.

                Look at this pigsty!

                You: This subreddit is not a pigsty, you are an illiterate moron

                That athlete is a machine.

                You: go learn what a machine is, you’d never make it as an engineer, because I’m in your head and know you didn’t intentionally mean to use a metaphor, because I’m full of myself and you’re a dumb anon.

                The difference between you and me in this respect is that I have no shame in apologizing when wrong, while you not so much. Why am I losing time with this? Because people like me have an interest in having people like you be a little less self-righteous.

                • Dee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  3
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  The rare quadruple down on the dumb. Calling a lemmy community a subreddit is not a metaphor, it’s objectively wrong. No matter how many non-applicable examples you provide. How are you this dense? (That’s rhetorical btw)

                  Because people like me have an interest in having people like you be a little less self-righteous.

                  lmfao the projection of writing this at the end of the most self righteous comment I’ve read on lemmy yet is delicious.