• @vamp07@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 years ago

    Well, we’re gonna start teaching kids about the different types of power sources and their pros and cons, I sure hope we starts pushing more education about nuclear.

  • @darmabum@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    192 years ago

    It always amuses me how politicians and community “faith based” leaders can blithely condemn what scientists have been warning about for decades, as if they know better (with no training or experience). Anti-intellectualism is the Dunning-Kruger effect applied to politics, known as Populism, aka the idiots revenge.

    • IWantToFuckSpez
      link
      fedilink
      23
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      These politicians don’t give a fuck about being right. They probably know they are wrong. Being a climate change denier just lines their pockets better.

  • @worfamerryman@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    332 years ago

    Florida kids are going to grow up and leave Florida and be like “What the fuck?” Why is the rest of the world different from what o was taught.

    • sparky@lemmy.federate.cc
      link
      fedilink
      62 years ago

      Leave Florida? The majority of Americans never travel more than a few hundred miles from where they’re born. And an overwhelming majority never leave the US.

  • @joneskind@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    352 years ago

    Is the SOB trying to burn the planet down or what? That’s criminal. I wish those POS could be held accountable for the dangerous ideas they push.

  • @some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    132 years ago

    He’s finally gone far enough out there that I now see this as more amusing than alarming. I’m sure I’ll get snapped back into anger soon enough, but I’m gonna enjoy this break from reality while it last. Clownfuck.

  • Storksforlegs
    link
    fedilink
    58
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Reminds me of how Trump has been going after wind farms for a long time. He claims they’re noisy and they’re killing all the birds. (He began saying this when Scotland wanted to place Wind farms near his Scottish golf resort)

      • ginerel
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        Problem was that they are government agents/drones/whatever and this is costly for the government

    • Onihikage
      link
      fedilink
      English
      342 years ago

      It’s almost silly to look into bird deaths and realize just how low wind power is on the list, even with its rapid growth in recent years. It was recently estimated that with the expected growth of wind power, it will be killing about 2.2 million birds a year in the US… in 2050. Meanwhile, power lines kill anywhere from 12 to 48 million a year right now, fossil-fueled power plants kill as many as 14 million a year right now, communication towers kill over 5 million, cars 60-80 million, pesticides as much as 90 million, and cats well over a billion. Every year. The numbers aren’t that hard to find. Replacing all fossil-fueled power plants with wind turbines would be a net positive for bird populations, and the facts make that very clear.

      https://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/data-mine/2014/08/22/pecking-order-energys-toll-on-birds
      https://www.energymonitor.ai/tech/renewables/weekly-data-how-many-birds-are-really-killed-by-wind-turbines/

      • @perdido@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        202 years ago

        If they actually cared about birds they’d shut up about wind power and try to get rid of cats instead

          • @blindsight@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            32 years ago

            And keep your cats indoors!! Outdoor cat pets should be illegal.

            (Maybe there’s a case for farm cats keeping vermin population in check? I don’t know enough to have an opinion on that.)

    • ampersandrew
      link
      fedilink
      72 years ago

      They did have an effect on birds though. I think it was almost entirely mitigated by painting one blade black, if memory serves, but it was based on some truth.

      • @middlemuddle@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        192 years ago

        Please don’t give their statement any credibility without adding the important context. Based in some truth may be technically accurate, but when compared to all the other possible causes of bird death it’s basically inconsequential.

        https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/threats-birds

        If there’s a solution, such as painting one blade a different color, then great. We can leave it up to the turbine engineers and wildlife agencies to address it, it doesn’t need to be part of any news cycle. Giving their outlandish claim any air at all lends it far too much weight.

    • raccoona_nongrata
      link
      fedilink
      English
      442 years ago

      There’s a chance by that point they’ll literally be able to blame climate change on green energy. Remember there were people in Florida blaming wind turbines for a hurricane a few years back. It’s not like the conservative base looks at facts and data, they believe what they’re told and if they get told solar causes Florida to sink they’ll believe it.

      This feels like corpos laying the groundwork for the next stage of climate denial – as the signs become undeniable, they’ll blame it on anything besides their fossil fuels.

      • @floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        252 years ago

        Remember there were people in Florida blaming wind turbines for a hurricane a few years back.

        So now it’s wind turbines causing hurricanes? I was told it was the existence of gay people. Which is it, conservatives?

  • @4am@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    1022 years ago

    Yes, Ron, everyone knows Clean Coal™️ is the one true source of non-pollution.

    Is anyone stupid enough to believe this?

    • @nxdefiant@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      92 years ago

      Belief in Clean Coal would be an improvement for his brain!

      He’s currently trying to pave Florida roads with literal radioactive mining waste.

      • @taylus@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        It’s fine though, if you say “radioactive” his supporters will insist it must be nuclear.

      • @0x815@feddit.deOP
        link
        fedilink
        192 years ago

        No, they aren’t. In 15 or 20 years, however, when people have left their indoctrination camps disguised as schools …

      • @poprocks@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        532 years ago

        I used to ride the bus with a lady who grew up in a coal town. We once debated over coal. She said it was so green because there were so many regulations and that wind and solar were horrible for the environment because they were killing birds. So yeah, people are stupid.

      • @floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        10
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Yep. They’re trying to get their lies in as these children’s first belief on the matter. Anyone pushing a different view (such as the truth) will then have to defeat this belief first. Same thing religions do, because they know their stuff doesn’t stand up to neutral mature scrutiny.

  • fmstrat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    602 years ago

    PragerU has produced anti-climate policy videos since shortly after it began in 2009. The Prager foundation has received millions of dollars from the billionaire brothers, Farris and Dan Wilks of Texas, who made their fortune in fracking.

    PragerU has received additional funding from foundations that oppose climate regulations such as the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation.

    PragerU CEO Streit said her group has tapped into angry parents who want their politics reflected more in classrooms.

    Yup.

    • Rentlar
      link
      fedilink
      412 years ago

      I see conservatives have already shifted from “take politics out of the classroom” to “put our politics into the classroom”.

      • @Umbrias@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        322 years ago

        That’s what it always was. Many people view. “Politics” as simply being anything they don’t like or disagree with.

          • @floofloof@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            18
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            This is common, and it’s why a lot of conservatives describe themselves as “not political” while acting and voting conservative. From their perspective it’s just all these annoying people stirring things up and demanding change to a perfectly good situation who are the political ones.

            In general, when someone says “I’m not political,” I hear “I’m unreflectively conservative.”

    • @mobyduck648@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      292 years ago

      If someone is lobbying for climate change denial then they’re guilty of something morally akin to treason, but it’s not treason itself because instead of just betraying just their country they’re betraying their entire species.