• @kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2128 days ago

    Dems are just a bunch of empty chairs.

    Sucks, but it’s also an opportunity. Plenty of space for progressives to move in and take over.

    • @aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      It’s mostly the consultant class morons that suck. Both parties used to be full of consultants until 2010-2015 with the rise of the tea party / trumpism. The GOP kicked most of the consultants to the curb, but the Democrats are still running campaigns like it’s 2008 and the voters give a shit about the color tie the candidate is wearing.

      Harris would’ve been a good candidate had she not been market researched to death.

      I obviously don’t agree with TDS-having morons that believe that all experts are useless, but expertise should really be evaluated every once in a while. It’s clear to me from my field that professional management and consultants are often goldbricking idiots with impressive resumes and few actual professional accomplishments.

      • Grumuk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        128 days ago

        Unfortunately this just isn’t true. It’s not the consultant class that made AOC cry on the floor of the House for not wanting to fund Israel’s iron dome, it was Nancy Pelosi. The whole infrastructure is corrupt with wall street money. It wasn’t the consultant class that disciplined each every squad member into toeing the party line, not coming out guns blazing for progressive candidates and calling for primaries against corporate Dems, it’s the party leadership.

        • @aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          They also suck. I’ll give you that. It’s all things at once: the policy sucks, the leadership sucks, and the messaging sucks. However, the leaders aren’t immune to the ouroboros nature of the consultancy within the Democratic party.

          Some of the leaders obviously internalized all of the marketing feedback. By the time Hillary Clinton did her final lap on the stage, she was clearly little more than 30 years of political marketing advice in a pantsuit.

          You’re right though, basically everyone involved is a sellout and that’s the real root of the problem.

  • @F_OFF_Reddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6129 days ago

    Dems are the establishment, both parties are full of old pieces of shit I think Bernie is the only decent one and he’s promoting stuff that we have in Europe and is basic for a rich western democracy.

    Nothing is gonna change unless people start rioting and protesting in the streets like the fucking French do, go set a few precints on fire and the ruling noble class will notice you once you kick a few of their loyal uniformed dogs

  • balderdash
    link
    fedilink
    4528 days ago

    The people need to save this country. Yes that means you and me actually going outside. We need to stop expecting systemic change to come from politicians within a two-party system.

    • Suite404
      link
      fedilink
      428 days ago

      Absolutely. Dems are at an all time low of approval as far as I’m aware. This is the opportune time to make a new one. Enough with the weak responses to a threat that not only throws the US into chaos, but the rest of the world as well.

  • @elatedCatfish@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    628 days ago

    Gonna be honest, wasn’t a huge fan of AOC a couple years ago. Glad to see her being the one person out there with Bernie trying to keep it real. Hell yeah

  • NoneOfUrBusiness
    link
    fedilink
    -1429 days ago

    I’d love to be wrong, but while they talk a lot neither of these two are accomplishing much on that front either. And no, I don’t mean their voting history.

    • @Barbarian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      1829 days ago

      Messaging is important. While the Republicans are saying “There’s some temporary pain, but it’ll all sort itself out in the end. We just need to get through this transition, and the tarrifs and deportations will MAGA”, there needs to be a counter-argument.

      They’re (thankfully) not preaching to the choir. They’re going to Republicans and independents and explaining in these rallies that there’s an oligarchy that has taken control, made them poorer, and it will get worse.

      If they can convince enough people of the real causes, they have a broader base, and potentially even some new progressives.

      • @lobut@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        lol Republicans messaging is always that BS. Just like trying to get rid of Obamacare.

        “it’ll sort itself out”.

        Yes, with lots of death and money lost.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness
        link
        fedilink
        229 days ago

        They’re going to Republicans and independents and explaining in these rallies that there’s an oligarchy that has taken control, made them poorer, and it will get worse.

        I doubt Republicans are attending these rallies; good chance most of the people attending are blue-leaning voters (which exist everywhere in the same way red-leaning voters exist in California).

        If they can convince enough people of the real causes, they have a broader base, and potentially even some new progressives.

        That’s true, but the problem is twofold here: First, without strong leadership willing to take to the streets all this messaging will never lead to action. Messaging is important, but it’s not everything. Second, America is going fascist at breakneck speed and doesn’t have the time for progressives slowly build up a base of support. This is a time of crisis, and both the Squad specifically and the American progressive movement in general are letting a good crisis go to waste (which incidentally is not how you solve a crisis). Everyone to the left of Ronald Reagan is acutely aware that something needs to be done, and many want someone to give them something to do. Bernie simply doesn’t give people anything to do—which even in the best of times this is a big problem with how he does things—but right now it’s downright suicidal.

        Edit: Typo.

        • @Barbarian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          329 days ago

          This is a time of crisis, and both the Squad specifically and the American progressive movement in general are letting a good crisis good to waste

          What would you recommend they do? And how would they go about doing that within the strictures of a two-party system where one is fascist and the other is captured?

          • NoneOfUrBusiness
            link
            fedilink
            529 days ago

            Drum up support for protests, boycotts, strikes and other forms of resistance. They—or anyone else trying to lead the American progressive movement now—have to understand that they’re leading a resistance movement, not a political movement. The battlefield ceased to be Washington in January; now it’s the hearts and minds of people and, most importantly, the streets. Bernie, if he’s interested leading the movement (which I doubt), should be linking up with local and state-level progressive movements and cooperating with them to organize a nationwide resistance effort, not try to pour progressive energy into a system that has already failed them. This resistance effort can then be reorganized into a third party and knock the democrats out of the competition with the legitimacy it’ll gain from being the resistance that toppled Trump’s regime. This is a time where the GOP is only concerned with their third of the population and the DNC has almost completely lost legitimacy in the eyes of the other two thirds; there is no reason to operate within the system. If the GOP plays a “good game of chess”, then the progressive movement should take a sledgehammer to the chess board.

  • @SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    I will put forward a radical suggestion for Progressive candidates in 2028: physically take control of television studios at key points, and make your message. This is because FOX and other mass-media channels are in the pocket of conservatives, so they will try to downplay or outright ignore Progressives, in an attempt to deplatform them among the general public.

    While online social platforms like Bluesky or physical locations like churches would be key for messaging, television is a major mouthpiece of the 1%. It will be important to steal the megaphone on occasion.

    The studios almost certainly will speak only for Trump when not busy with glazing his nethers.

  • @Brodysseus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    727 days ago

    I hope those two start taking more young actually left leaning politicians (or even would-be politicians) under their wing and publicly endorsing them.

  • @huppakee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    328 days ago

    So many comments about them starting a new political party and I don’t want to disagree but if democrats already have less votes than republicans now, wouldn’t that make it even harder to win an election?

    • @skytrim@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      428 days ago

      Huge numbers of people eligible to vote, do not vote. I think the hope behind these calls for new parties is that the shy voters would like a change and would vote for a radical alternative in enough numbers to elect the Left into government. I am less convinced that shy voters are just waiting to give their votes to a better party. I think many have given up on representative democracy. The way all democracy, but especially USA democracy, has been privatised means you would still have to get massive funding to run a campaign just for the new party to be noticed by the media, let alone win votes from people not motivated to even bother to register to vote before. Thus your new party has to pander to donors more than its members or potential voters and the old, old story repeats on a loop where the party is just a puppet to wealthy puppet-masters. Old Dems are dead, welcome the New Dems, same as the old Dems.

      Thinking things over, I am pretty old, nearly 70, I have recently decided that political parties and representative democracy are not able to deliver good government. Maybe last century they did, sometimes, but there’s no way to go back in time. I now believe in direct democracy and some kind of anarchy - my model is life in a small community, everyone knows and trusts each other, agrees the rules on how to run their lives, the focus is on just living each day and being as happy as possible. This society meets human need, in humane ways. We humans need that kind of nurturing. Modern nation states are too big, too complex, admin is too ‘one size must fit all’ impersonal not to be inefficient and tyranical. Better to live in smaller communities and have more autonomy. Manage larger problems through a wider network of those who share your values, a federation of new city states maybe. Can it be done? Only way to know is to try it.

      The Far-Right have smashed the old reality. Their ideas about new cities-states imagine them as kingdoms with absolute monarchs, elites admin, and slaves with no rights, only allowed to live if they generate profits. It is up to each of us to use this cursed opportunity to make a new future different from the dystopia imagined by Curtis Yarvin and his ilk. We have to dare to be free. As things get worse, it will not be a choice but a necessity. Be your own rescuer or be another’s slave. Political parties have almost never been our friend, no matter what they say just to get our votes. More of the same is just slow death.

    • @JustARaccoon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      628 days ago

      The democrats have less votes because their policies are platitudes and austerity at the expense of the working people and in service to party donors. It’s not for a lack of leftist sentiment, as Bernie himself still has quite a bit of a following in spite being independent