- cross-posted to:
- programmer_humor@programming.dev
- cross-posted to:
- programmer_humor@programming.dev
You must log in or register to comment.
waterfall:
- you want to go to mars
- plan to build a rocket
- sign contracts with vendors for every tiny part
- shit we didn’t need most of those parts but it’s too late
- continue to follow the plan anyway
- you now have a rocket but it doesn’t really work properly because parts needed shims to work together because the brochure didn’t mention that and the people making the plans weren’t actually building anything and also you actually wanted to drive to the beach
So most are Lean development?
I don’t care how we get him there - as long as we don’t give Elon a rocket to get back.
who cares about mars?! i’d be happy just to get him in the sky and let it crash land.
ok, meet in the middle, shove a firecracker up his arse and attach some wings to him.
This was all pretty unrelatable. Makes me wonder if the author has ever studied how these methods are supposed to work.
Everywhere I’ve worked has been the last 4 combined.
Why do we like to pretend waterfall is this great old way to do stuff that had no problems at all?
because the comic says it’s better, duh
Where does SAFe fall into this?
Isn’t that basically trying to do agile within waterfall?
Yes. It’s an abomination.