• @TheFogan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      93 months ago

      I was thinking exactly the same thing… maybe with the exception of the 30% that actually believed his bullshit enough to vote for him… I’ve been bracing for the huge inflation bolster since he was elected…

      Hell trump and musk have kind of warned us, inflation is going to get worse (and lied about it being so it can get better… ignoring the general fact that inflation is a one way street, you can’t fix it… you can only slow it down, and/or speed up wages to catch up to it)

    • @WaxiestSteam69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1373 months ago

      I know I’ve seen this on several websites today. What was everyone expecting? The only think I can think of is the old trope that Republican administrations are better for the economy. I have coworkers who were basically expecting miracles once Trump got into office. Things are probably gonna be bad.

      • @vividspecter@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Inflation has generally dropped significantly in most developed countries and is mostly tied to post-pandemic effects and the war in Ukraine. So if you ignore the debilitating influence of Trump, you would expect inflation to continue to drop in the US too.

        The 3% rate isn’t actually all that high currently, but you’d expect it to trend up again due to tariffs, both from the actual effects and as an excuse for companies to raise prices.

        Or Trump could cause a serious recession/depression, in which case inflation will drop (but you won’t be able to buy anything anyway, since you’ll have lost your job).

        • @WaxiestSteam69@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 months ago

          You are correct. And if Biden or Harris had been elected and we could he reasonably assured we’d continue on a stable path we’d probably be in a different situation. But Trump and team are a different story.

      • dohpaz42
        link
        fedilink
        English
        873 months ago

        Correct me if I’m wrong, but don’t most (if not all) Republican administrations cause recessions or other damage to economies?

        • @whyrat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          82
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Every Republican presidential term in my lifetime has had a recession start. None of the Democratic ones have…

          Regan; one started each term. First Bush had one in his term. Clinton had none in his 2 terms. Second Bush had a HUGE one each time (dot com and great recession). Obama had none in his 2 terms. trump had one in his first term (triggered by covid & shutdowns; which his (in)actions intensified…). Biden didn’t have one (but; just barely… and only by the official definition [NBER]; he did have two negative real GDP quarters, so one could argue this point). Now we’re starting trump’s second term, so we’ll see (it’s pretty clear we’ll have a recession within 2 years).

          This isn’t really debatable unless you ignore the evidence. Stock market and real GDP growth are overall way higher under Democrat presidents. One link for reference (but many more are available): https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11127-021-00912-y

          • @Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            The 2008 Crash was the direct result of Clinton’s repealing of the Glass-Steagal Act (with the full support from the Republicans, so I’m not actually excusing them).

            In the process of pointing out just how bad the Republicans are for the Economy, let’s not excuse the Democrats so much that it turns into whitewashing.

            • @Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Clinton repealed the Glass-Steagal Act, inflating a massive bubble (especially in Finance) which blew up in 2008.

              If you’re going to laud him for the positive effects of the bubble he inflated, then it’s only fair to criticize him for the ultimate result of his bubble-pumping policies, which wiped out all the gains from the bubble.

        • @WaxiestSteam69@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          153 months ago

          Historically the US economy generally performs better under Democratic administrations than Republican ones. I’ve read several articles and studies that show this. I’m on mobile and don’t have the time to find them However polls show that Americans consistently have the opinion that Republican admins are better on economics. And this despite no matter how much evidence os presented.

          • @Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            33 months ago

            However polls show that Americans consistently have the opinion that Republican admins are better on economics.

            Newsflash: Americans are fucking dumb. Mind numblying fucking dumb. Their stupidity triggered an overflow in the universe to where they’ve looped around and think everyone else is dumber than them.

        • @HRDS_654@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          323 months ago

          You are not wrong, I don’t know where the other poster got their information, but Republicans almost always destroy the economy and the Democrats (kind of) fix it just in time to be blamed for the economy being bad.

          • @Broadfern@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            173 months ago

            The “trope” is public perception, not actual historical pattern. Every time a Republican president gets elected the exit polls are full of “economic concerns.” What that actually means is left to interpretation but so it goes.

            • TheLowestStone
              link
              fedilink
              113 months ago

              What that actually means is left to interpretation but so it goes.

              It means they think minorities had too much money.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        93 months ago

        What was everyone expecting?

        The ones who voted for Trump? To get their pony. And they’ll keep shutting their eyes and plugging their ears waiting for their pony until they starve to death because everyone else has already emptied the dumpster of food.

    • Zerlyna
      link
      fedilink
      English
      63 months ago

      I buy steel products and the domestic prices are already increasing. Defeats the point of buying here vs importing. 🤷‍♀️

      • @_stranger_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        33 months ago

        Yeah that’s because the U.S. doesn’t have the production capacity to support its steel demands. We import something like 20% of the steel we use, and it’s mostly from our neighbors, which these fucking dumbasses are pissing off for zero benefit.

        • @shawn1122@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          His rationale is to slowly bring that production back to the US. Can the US even make enough steel to meet its demand domestically?

          The theory is that it’ll hurt for 5 to 10 years but be economically beneficial in the long run.

          • @_stranger_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            43 months ago

            He doesn’t have rationale.

            He could just pass laws to require more steel production, even subsidise it, which would work faster and not be painful, but that kind of planning and forward thinking are beyond a conservative.

        • @mctoasterson@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          13 months ago

          Biden took a protectionist action by blocking a Japanese company’s purchase of a major US Steel company. Trump took further protectionist action by tariffing foreign steel.

          Now both of those may have backfired because the market manipulation prevented outside investors from modernizing US steel production facilities, and protective tariffs by definition raise prices.

          In effect it is less competition and crappier product for US consumers.

  • @iopq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    133 months ago

    Before reacting, read the article

    Inflation rose to 3% in January, its highest rate for six months, and above the 2.9% expected by economists.

    This is significant for bankers, but not for regular people. You’re not going to notice that inflation is 0.1% higher than expected

    • justOnePersistentKbinPlease
      link
      fedilink
      93 months ago

      0.1% for someone with a $500,000 mortgage would be $500.

      0.1% for a large company, like say, Blackrock, that has $15 billion dollars in debt, is 15 million dollars.

      Edit: however, Blackrock also *profited to the tune of 4.7 billion dollars, so the 0.1% increase is a 0.3% cut into their profit from last year. They can absolutely afford it.

    • @branno@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 months ago

      Driven primarily by….

      The cost of eggs. Yes regular people are going to notice this.

      • @iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        03 months ago

        Food at home up 1.9%

        You didn’t even check what it’s driven by, but you confidently state it

        • @branno@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I’m just basing my opinion on the text of the article. The article you told people to read:

          US inflation increased by more than expected last month, as higher egg and energy prices helped to push up the cost of living for Americans.

          Grocery prices climbed 0.5% over the month, compared with 0.3% in December, as egg prices surged more than 15% … That marked the biggest monthly increase in nearly a decade, the Labor Department said.

          Then you reply with a statistic that doesn’t appear in the article with no reference. Fucking MAGATs.

    • @Nollij@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -4
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I’d be interested in seeing where the inflation was higher than expectations. He’s only been in office a few weeks; most of these markets don’t react that quickly.

      Edit: Ahh, Lemmy. Where people get down voted for wanting more information.

  • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    623 months ago

    That article is carrying a lot of water for the Trump administration. Nobody knows why prices are going up!

    • @nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      203 months ago

      Import tariffs are explicitly inflationary. Even the rhumor of them is arguably inflationary. Lowering the interest rate (which Trump is currently in the midst of bullying the Fed chair into doing ) is also explicitly inflationary.

      All of the things he has done that actually pertain to inflation have been to increase it.

      • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        12
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Yeah, which is why this is a bad article from the BBC. The headline should be, Trump Causes Inflation.

    • @neons@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      43 months ago

      That article is carrying a lot of water for the Trump administration

      Just admit you only read the Headline.

  • @wildlyfist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -13 months ago

    Trump’s fine with that as far as his gold reserves are going to skyrocket in value. That’s maybe one of the reasons why he wants these tariffs so bad in the first place.

    (Get precious metals asap, btw.)

  • @LordCrom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    113 months ago

    When will we start seeing stickers at gas pumps and at grocery’s saying “Trump did this”.

    How about flags saying “Let’s Go Eric” as an answer to all the let’s go Brandon flags

  • @Shardikprime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -7
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    This US INFLATION ‘increase’ is about the smallest possible;

    the headline is at best misleading and sensationalism at worst.

    ’ UNEXPECTEDLY INCREASES’ should say ‘inched from 2.9% to 3%, which happens routinely at the beginning of every year’.

    0.1% is the smallest unit it can go up by.

    This is literally a nothing burger

    • @fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      93 months ago

      I agree that it’s probably a sensational article. No matter what the numbers actually are - it’s too early to draw a line to Trumps policy decisions.

      It’s cherry picking, but I’ll point out the 15% increase in the cost of eggs due to Avian flu. I mean, if we blamed Biden for inflation over the last several years then we can place this at Trump’s door step surely?

      In any case, I look forward to seeing the MAGA-splaining in the coming months.

      • billwashere
        link
        fedilink
        English
        53 months ago

        Is it too early? Considering that a substantial portion of our imported goods originate from a country subject to a 10% tariff, wouldn’t this policy inevitably lead to significant price increases for those products?

      • @shawn1122@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 months ago

        You’re likely vastly overestimating their understanding of inflation. For many of them it came down to “China pays for it!” and they have no further knowledge or insight beyond that.

        Yes, China pays for it, just like Mexico paid for the wall 🙄.

    • @futatorius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      173 months ago

      14 years of Conservative government has left the BBC senior ranks full of Tory placeholders and shills.