Let’s face it, the dems don’t care about the commoners, the republicans are actually pure evil, everyone was happy when that shitstain CEO got shot.

Maybe we should build on this momentum we have to drive actual change at the political level.

my first act as president in 2029 would be to issue a full and unconditional pardon of the billionaire killer.

edit:

well alrighty then, followup question, does anyone want to join my newly formed political party? I’m going to start working on drafting our mission statement, or manifesto or whatever it should be called.

Further Edit: I set up a lemmy community for us to post shit about it. If you want to join, that’s our official, unofficial space. https://lemmy.world/c/newpoliticalparty

  • @randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    95 months ago

    Don’t Start With President! Running for president as a party that doesn’t have any senators or governors is a massive waste of money on an ego trip that normally hurts the side that people voting for them support.

    Start with safe democratic states, like New York and California. Run for safe democratic mayor-ships and house seats. Once you get a couple of wins, momentum, and a bench of candidates: then try for governor or senator. Once you get more than 3 of them THEN you choose the most popular among the group and run them for president.

    • @problematicPanther@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      15 months ago

      You’re right, I’m not actually serious about running for president or fielding a candidate for president, but we should run in all the deep blue and the deep red states.

  • @Rooskie91@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    35 months ago

    Could look into the working families party. I like their policies, and they’re building power from the ground up in local elections rather than trying to run a presidential candidate.

  • @blazera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    45 months ago

    To everyone bringing up FPTP, other countries manage to not have it, it can be done, so stop fighting so hard against efforts to doing away with it.

  • @Intergalactic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -1
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Third parties don’t work. Support progressives and progressives only in the Democratic Party. The Working Families Party is a fantastic party as well.

  • @NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    35 months ago

    We need electoral reform that implements a system where more than two parties becomes viable. Imagine splitting left-leaning voters even more than they are now. It’s guaranteed wins for Republicans.

    First Past the Post must be done away with and there should instead be a coalition of voters that refuse to support ANY candidate that doesn’t make it their primary campaign policy. Once that’s done, smaller parties will organically be created and incorporated into the system.

    Support organizations listed here, specifically FairVote.

      • @davidgro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        15 months ago

        Then do STAR, or approval. Those are simple. And I think even more likely to allow 3rd parties.

        Pretty much anything is better than FPTP.

        • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15 months ago

          Personally, I think a 2 round system is the best bet.

          Or a non-partisan blanket primary with top 2 going into a 1vs1 general election.

          Both are similar, with the goal of eliminating the spoiler effect, and its easy to understand, since we are still choosing one name, but with 2 rounds of elections instead.

          • @davidgro@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            25 months ago

            Those don’t eliminate the spoiler effect, but it does end up looking different. (Maybe has a different name in this form?)

            My blue state has a blanket primary, and this last election I saw that demonstrated:

            One race had two Republicans and like half a dozen Democrats and another half a dozen in other parties. The Republican vote of course was split between the two candidates. The Democrat vote was split like a hydra and we very nearly had (few hundred votes away) the two Republicans go to the general!

            Fortunately, the top Dem barely squeaked into second place, and then easily won the general, but it was mighty close.

  • Lord Wiggle
    link
    fedilink
    15 months ago

    Since criminals can be president now, I think Joe Exotic should be president. Make America exotic again!

    People don’t want to empower the workers and take away money and power from billionaires. Bernie Sanders already tried this but it’s not how America works and what Americans want.

    With the current system, every new party will take away votes from the party it’s closest to. This ensures more voting percentage for the opponents. So when you create a socialist party, most of the votes you will get will be from democrats who won’t vote for the democratic party, so it’s easier for the Republicans to win. You just helped the opposite side.

    Maybe when you create a party close to the Republicans you can steal their voters so the democrats have a higher chance of winning. Maybe do the same within the democrats to scatter their votes in a way so Bernie will get the majority.

      • @HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        35 months ago

        Unfortunately, the only real path out of this at this point is violent revolution. We tried everything else. For decades. Pleaded with them to listen. They arrested and murdered us. Brainwashed the average person using sophisticated psychological conditioning. Captured every branch of government and agency.

        Tell me another way. I am begging you. But I’ve been looking for years and I have hit a wall. We are out of time.

        They chose this.

    • @scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15 months ago

      We need one, but a third party will not get the desired result. It will only subtract from whoever major party is a little more like it, in this case probably the Democrats. Sad to say: the only meaningful path forward is to change the parties from within. I know that sounds daunting and boring. But can anyone reasonably think this will be easy and fun?

    • folkrav
      link
      fedilink
      15 months ago

      Phew, a lot of their Democrats actually seem to think they sit left of the spectrum, and they already get called commies by their right wing. Their brains might split in two when they realize that their Democrats are merely another side of the same liberal coin…

  • @dgmib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    13
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Need to fix the broken FPTP voting system first. Otherwise any left leaning political party will just take votes away from the dems and hand the election to the republicans.

    And Republicans know this by the way, any left leaning fringe party will get financial donations from the Republican Party,

    • @scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15 months ago

      Thank god the actual answer is already here. Now let’s please vote it above the well-meaning fantasy comments saying “yeah! do it!”

  • @EvilZ@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    05 months ago

    Well I think the real question should be, why isn’t the democratic party being sued for preventing other political parties from presenting themselves…

    The issue is that with a two party system it permits bit sides to take its population for granted… No real competition

    • @problematicPanther@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      35 months ago

      With enough momentum, we can start a grassroots movement.

      They just arrested the only one of us with enough guts to do anything tangible about the fucked up system. If we stop now, he’ll go down, shit will stay the same. We need to be outraged. We need to be out there, shitting on billionaire CEOs of insurance companies. We need to make sure that nobody forgets who holds the actual power. It’s not them, the wealthy few, it’s us, the masses.

      Our grandparents parents pulled off more difficult shit with less than what we had, we cannot let these fuckers take back what was fought so hard for.

      • @yarr@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 months ago

        Well, good on you man. I’m skeptical this event can be pivoted into actual positive change for the average American, but if you have enough resolve to make a go of it, you’re a better man than I.

  • sunzu2
    link
    fedilink
    -15 months ago

    Based on how the public reacted to a dead parasite there is clearly demand for the alternative to current clown regime.

    The Adjuster’s hard work last week really highlighted that people are tired and ready for a change.

    He has done more to galvanize the public than anyone during my life time.

    • @krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      05 months ago

      It’s not going to amount to anything if he’s the only one taking action. If we’ve all just been waiting for things to get started then where is everyone now? I’ve seen tons of “I’ve got my pitchfork ready for when things get started” posts over the last few years but now that it’s supposedly here I only see the one pitchfork.

      Obviously I’m not doing anything either but the question I’m getting at is, is it fair to say the public has been galvanized if it’s just one guy doing one thing while a bunch of people watch?

      • sunzu2
        link
        fedilink
        -15 months ago

        At least everyone can agree that we support him… So that’s a step in the right direction.

        I am not sure what will come of it but shit posting in his support has to be rattling the owner class.

        So there is sone benefit there too.

        Bigger picture is that we need politicians to do something but they won’t

        It seems they don’t care to do anything for iseven if we vote for them.

  • JaggedRobotPubes
    link
    fedilink
    English
    115 months ago

    First past the post is what you’re tangling with.

    Https://youtu.be/s7tWHJfhiyo

    It makes it so third parties only hurt their closest friend and lose to their least favorite party. Taking that energy into the democratic party itself is probably the best bet. Not good, but best.

    In ranked choice, yes a new party would probably be best.

  • @maplebar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    185 months ago

    Until we have a voting system where 3rd parties are viable (for example. Ranked Choice Voting, Star Voting, Approval Voting, etc.), we absolutely do not benefit in any way for the existence of more parties.

    Whether intentional or not, America today is a two-party system by design. If you want more choices beyond the Democrats and Republicans, you need to help us enact voting system reforms which are necessary to allow 3rd parties to exist legitimately. We aren’t joking when we say that voting 3rd party is throwing your vote away; it very much is.