🙄

  • Aiden
    link
    fedilink
    412 years ago

    Mmmm yes. Can’t wait to X about this!

    • zephyrvs
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      An insight that’s coming a couple of years too late though.

    • @TheYang@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      72 years ago

      Depends.

      If he thinks Twitter is irreperably dying, this may be a way, in which he can get out of repaying the loans he used to (partially) fund the buyout of twitter.

        • @TheYang@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          depends how the loans worked.
          I was assuming his majority shares of X (ex Twitter) collateral.
          And that that he could just go “yeah, go on, collect on your collateral, I don’t mind”, because it’s not worth anything anymore.

          But admittedly I have no Idea how the contracts were drawn up, if this is possible and if his other money would be available to collect on.

        • @BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          182 years ago

          The lenders lawyer arrives at the Twitter office:

          Lawyer: This is Twitter, is it?

          Musk: (with a fake mustache) No, it’s X.

            • @BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              62 years ago

              That makes me think of the theory about Saudi Arabia and probably other countries have had it in for Twitter since Arab Spring.

              So this is just Elon doing as instructed: “Make Twitter disappear, but make it look like an accident”

      • milkjug
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        At some point some creditor should be desperate enough to do a margin call, since the loan collateral is next to worthless.

      • @agentsquirrel@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        152 years ago

        If you’re thinking this an “artist formerly known as Prince” sort of thing where Prince got out of a contract, I’m sure all the debt holders have the proper legal verbiage to have agreements remain valid in the event of a name change.

    • @sol@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      182 years ago

      No rich person is actually smart, they are all addicted to money and can’t get help over it. But their moves in the business world are all calculated, this guy is doing exactly what he wants to do and their goal is to make money not to lose them.

      • @PopOfAfrica@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        192 years ago

        Smart people are more risk adverse. It seems like the only way to become mega wealthy is to haphazardly gamble. We only hear about the successes due to survivorship bias.

        They really are just lucky bastards.

        • @sol@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          They are lucky because the average person won’t even bother checking out on wikipedia how they become so rich

          • Doug [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            62 years ago

            That’s a very big part of it.

            When fucknugget wanted to start a company he had plenty of credit either on his own, with his name, or both. If he blew 50k in an attempt he could try again next week.

            If I blew 50k I’d be homeless.

            It’s way easier to high stakes gamble when you won’t notice you lost.

      • @ipkpjersi@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        102 years ago

        this guy is doing exactly what he wants to do and their goal is to make money not to lose them.

        How does this make him money exactly? lol

        He is literally just killing off his website.

        • @sol@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          My guess: the same way the now called Meta benefited from stalling facebook and moving people to their other platforms like instagram. These marketers perceive everything in market terms, twitter is old and they need to release a brand new product to hook people up

        • @Banzai51@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          I’m waiting for the next step when he tries to add features to make X whatever he envisions. Oh, those devs I fired. Hey, why can’t we hire anyone? No one wants to work.

        • @sol@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          Money are an addiction just like smoke, sex or drugs. If you can’t cope with being addicted to gold at the end of the day you are dumber than some kids

  • @JohnnyLX91@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82 years ago

    Lmao I hope in a couple of years someone just takes the twitter branding and rebuilds it.

    Not that I am a fan of twitter, may that plattform burn in hell, but just to shove it into Musks face.

  • freamon
    link
    fedilink
    English
    272 years ago

    'Cos it marks the spot where he buried all his treasure, amirite?

    • roofuskit
      link
      fedilink
      82 years ago

      I don’t know about ALL his treasure, but he definitely buried 35 billion dollars in there. Never to be seen again.

  • Gormadt
    link
    fedilink
    1952 years ago

    Ffs

    Yes change the name and iconic logo of a huge corporation, that will go over great.

    If he hadn’t demonstrated his incompetence earlier I’d think it was intentional.

    I still think there’s a bit of intent to destroy the company but it’s kinda hard to tell.

    • @poorsocialskills@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      1212 years ago

      There’s a woman over on Mastodon making the argument that he’s trying to destroy it so it can’t be used to organize left-leaning political action (fundraising, activism, issue messaging, etc) any longer. She makes a compelling argument.

      • Xerø
        link
        fedilink
        72 years ago

        I’ve been saying the same thing in multiple Lemmy posts and on Mastodon. Twitter and Reddit were both used by progressives to organize.

      • blazera
        link
        fedilink
        202 years ago

        he bought it pretty soon after a meeting with Putin, while the Ukraine invasion was fresh and international support was rallying on Twitter. So, blackmail, bribery, buy up Twitter and immediately gut it.

      • Big P
        link
        fedilink
        312 years ago

        The issue with that argument is… Why? He is a business man, activism generally doesn’t effect him, tesla cars are generally liked by left leaning middle class, why would he spend so much money to destroy something?

        • @Ganbat@lemmyonline.com
          link
          fedilink
          152 years ago

          One factor is his obsession with crypto and Blockchain shit. Left-wing activism generally stands against that stuff because of the environmental impact. Additionally, right-wing political movements recently have been lowering safety standards in business. Bad for the worker, but great for the bottom line.

      • bedrooms
        link
        fedilink
        972 years ago

        I don’t buy that. He tried to cancel the purchase. He’s also losing money, and so it’s definitely not a 3D chess.

        • @Banzai51@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          292 years ago

          Not only that, it would have been easier and cheaper to just shut the whole thing down after taking ownership. His very public (mainly by his own tweeting) stewardship of Twitter is damaging to his reputation, and the reputation of his other businesses. The reality is, he just is that dumb.

          • @anlumo@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            52 years ago

            If he’d just shut it down, he probably would have been personally liable for Twitter’s debt, because he didn’t even try.

          • @regul@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            112 years ago

            His net worth has only gone up since he bought it, iirc. Tesla will continue to print money at least for a little while until other automakers catch up on EVs. SpaceX doesn’t seem to have any viable competitors, and both sides of the aisle agree on privatizing space, so that’s a big growth industry. This is the unfortunate fact of capitalism in general and late-stage capitalism in particular.

            • Ech
              link
              fedilink
              8
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              His net worth has only gone up since he bought it, iirc

              It absolutely didn’t. His net worth dropped over 50% in the months following the purchase. It’s back up above $200b at this point according to Forbes, but he’s still down from his pre-purchase state.

        • @qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          492 years ago

          Didn’t Twitter almost take him to court if he didn’t follow through with the purchase? I think he got caught in his over investment in Twitter last year, and rather than go through a trial with discovery (I think he NEEDED to follow through to avoid this specifically), he decided to go through with the purchase. I wonder what the hell they would have found during a trial discovery that made him sink $44B.

          But what he’s doing now? I don’t think it’s related to that. I think it might be to help manipulate stocks, as we have seen him do several months back. Maybe he thinks that destroying left-leaning political action saves him in taxes? He destroyed public transportation in California just so people would theoretically purchase more Tesla cars. Nothing is beyond being trampled by Musk if he thinks he can benefit by stumbling over the other side of the corpse.

          • DJDarren
            link
            fedilink
            English
            82 years ago

            He’s the consummate failson. Rich enough that he’ll never actually experience any tangible negativity from his various ventures, if he has a skill, it’s in self-publicity and (historically) throwing money at ventures that are already on an upward trajectory.

            But I feel that all the cocaine and being surrounded by Yes Men have led to him tipping over the edge.

      • Nepenthe
        link
        fedilink
        42
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I’d believe it if I hadn’t already heard of Musk being the type to fire workers in his line of sight at pure random simply to fire someone. It apparently got so bad that aids would plan the route he would take to the meetings around having as few victims as possible out in the open.

        It would be a smart move for anyone, and he is succeeding to a good extent (they’ll just go elsewhere?), but I think that’s just a happy accident of his. I feel like he’s really just using it as a chew toy so he can feel all big and important with the headlines. If he were being journalistically gray rocked, I wonder what he’d do.

    • fearout
      link
      fedilink
      28
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I saw this article posted in another thread and it seems to explain a lot. Not sure how close it is to reality, but it looks like nostalgia is at least a partial reason for this change.

      Yep. Fucking nostalgia.

      • @sub_ubi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Thiel backstabbed Musk before X became a thing, because he’s a fucking weasel and Musk is a moron government contractor. It’s also really funny he took the company while Musk was on honeymoon.

        • Mike
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          Paypal’s board brought Thiel in and ousted Musk. Thiel didn’t do that on his own, he was begged to come back.

  • thingsiplay
    link
    fedilink
    382 years ago

    @chiz X is so easy to search in internet. So many results; it gets never boring! Very unique name and brand.

    Spez: Write it down, write it down! Let’s rename Reddit to Z! Employee: Why Z? Spez: What do you mean why? Does X make any sense to you too? Employee: All right, I should have never questioned you.

  • @figaro@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    712 years ago

    Was Twitter ever really a left leaning platform in the first place? It pretty much always felt like it was filled with Russian bots and maga shit.

    So I guess good job Musk for burning down a shit website? Lol

    As a side note, Mastodon is legitimately fantastic. The community there is genuinely nice.

    • The Cuuuuube
      link
      fedilink
      722 years ago

      It was left leaning until about 2014. Then it slowly crept farther and farther right wing. Slowly bleeding users who didn’t want to deal with the fascist jerks. Slowly converting fence sitters into fascist jerks by normalizing fascism by pretending it was just asking questions, just making edgy jokes, you know the drill. Next, 2016 came. That for me was when the bottom fell out of twitter. The Russian twitter bots were everywhere. And it took twitter way too long to deal with it. I think by that point, the platform was ruined. It was never going to grow meaningfully by attracting new people. It was just going to slowly decay as people looked for their friends and favorite creators on Reddit, Discord, Youtube, or wherever else they went. But that decay would have been slow until Elon tanked it. His efforts have chased off users in droves

      • @sci@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        102 years ago

        Most new platforms are left leaning from the start, because left leaning people are more likely to try out new platforms. Once platforms get mainstream they will be picked up by right leaning media.