Israel carried out its operation against Hezbollah on Tuesday by hiding explosive material within a new batch of Taiwanese-made pagers imported into Lebanon, according to American and other officials briefed on the operation.

The pagers, which Hezbollah had ordered from Gold Apollo in Taiwan, had been tampered with before they reached Lebanon, according to some of the officials. Most were the company’s AP924 model, though three other Gold Apollo models were also included in the shipment.

The explosive material, as little as one to two ounces, was implanted next to the battery in each pager, two of the officials said. A switch was also embedded that could be triggered remotely to detonate the explosives.

MBFC
Archive

  • poo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    647 months ago

    Israel is truly disgusting and abhorrent.

  • @BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -457 months ago

    This was such a cool way to kill bad guys. I hope to read more about how they did this like their Stuxnet virus blew up Iranian centrifuges

    • tuckerm
      link
      fedilink
      197 months ago

      The way that they pulled off this attack is interesting from a cybersecurity standpoint, but we can’t ignore the fact that Israel had no way of knowing who was near the devices when they exploded. They very nature of this attack made it impossible for Israel to know how closely they were targeting the bad guys or how many civilians were nearby.

    • NoIWontPickAName
      link
      fedilink
      317 months ago

      Until you account for all the innocent people it hurt.

      Involving civilians is bad no matter whose side is doing it.

      • @Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        You misunderstand, they’re being sarcastic.

        Ed: to be specific they reference the most famous result of unexpected consequences.

        The US government created a virus managed stucnet that infested and threw off industrial controllers of a specific brand they knew were used with Iranian centrifuges that enrich nuclear material. Their plan worked and the centrifuges were destroyed.

        Later on they found out stuxnet accidently infected a bunch of other controllers, ones that were in hospitals, power plants ect. It ended up being one of the most widespread viruses ever.

        Essentially they’re saying planting bombs in pagers could never have unexpected consequences. /S

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I have not seen a doctor with a pager in a long time and I have spent a ton of time in hospitals over the past year. They all have smartwatches now.

      • @Shiftless@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        157 months ago

        Doctors still have pagers. The pager will just have a phone number the doctor needs to call as to not violate patient privacy. Instead of calling the doctor directly, they use a pager to request a call because of the bad service that is common within hospitals. At least that’s what I know

      • @IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        77 months ago

        Back when cell phones were just starting to get “smart” I knew a few folks that carried both a pager & phone. They lived in rural areas where pager coverage was decent but phone coverage was spotty at best, and non-existent in places.

      • @IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        37 months ago

        Is this universal around all of Lebanon or only the hospital you were at? There were reports claiming medical personnel were hit with the pagers.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          English
          07 months ago

          Did OP mean in Lebanon when they said that doctors in 2024 were the foremost use of pagers?

          Since they asked which country I was talking about, I think they just meant it in general.

      • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        77 months ago

        I have not seen a doctor with a pager in a long time

        My friend’s a pulminologist and his hospital still uses pagers. They just never bothered to upgrade their 20 year old system to use SMS. And he says he’s partial to it, because he’s not forced to check his phone every time it rings when 99% of the messages are spam texts anyway.

              • @finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                0
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                For using deviced capable of recording audio and transmitting photos of the environment at all times. Every patient that comes through has all of their vulnerabilities exposed.

                I hope hospitals that promote such behavior get sued into the ground.

          • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            47 months ago

            That’s not true. Pagers are still in regular use for two reasons:

            • Hospitals hate upgrading their tech infrastructure, so they’ll sit on a 20 year old system until it falls to pieces

            • Pagers don’t get spam texts at the same volume as cell phones, so you can be confident that when your pager rings its serious and not automated solicitations.

  • Icalasari
    link
    fedilink
    177 months ago

    What is Israel trying to do, beat Canada’s record for war crimes added to the Geneva Convention?

    Or are they trying to piss off the Middle East enough to get them all to bomb them all at once so they can demand the US send in troops to protect them, dragging the world ever closer to WWIII because their sociopathic leader wants to genocide a people to get real estate?

    • ShadowRam
      link
      fedilink
      157 months ago

      Canada’s record for war crimes added to the Geneva Convention?

      what?

      • Icalasari
        link
        fedilink
        227 months ago

        Canada in WWII basically invented a bunch of entirely new warcrimes

        There’s a reason Nazi Germany was terrified of Canadians and convinced they were demons sent from hell itself

        EDIT: Got which world war wrong. Nazi Germany feared Canada because of what Canada did in WWI

        • Orbituary
          link
          fedilink
          English
          127 months ago

          Link or source, please. This sounds intriguing.

          • Icalasari
            link
            fedilink
            227 months ago

            Whoops, got which world war wrong. It was world war one

            https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/the-forgotten-ferocity-of-canadas-soldiers-in-the-great-war (I know, ew, National Post)

            https://www.cbc.ca/history/SECTIONSE1EP12CH1LE.html (holy shit CBC update this part of your site. This one is more to back it up in that even with pride behind it, it kind of has an underlying tone of… Holding back)

            It’s hard to find direct proper sources since it seems we’ve buried that part of our history some and Google sucks ass these days, but I’ll edit in more as I find them

            EDIT: https://web.viu.ca/davies/H355H.Cda.WWI/Cook.PoliticsOfSurrender.pdf (university site)

            • @phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              147 months ago

              First link is behind a paywall, second link doesn’t have anything about war crimes, third link is an academic paper talking about surrendering germans and how they were often killed by Canadian forces. It notes that killing of surrendering forces was an all participants type thing not entirely specific to Canada though. Even notes that Britain was particularly bad about surrendering enemies due to fake surrenders in the South African War just a decade or so before.

              • @naught@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                67 months ago

                I’ve just read a book about Somme, and it’s absolutely true for that battle that surrendered enemies were killed for mere convenience - so they wouldn’t have to take them back and feed them. I read this of the British in particular, but that’s who the book was about, so.

              • @shaserlark@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                47 months ago

                The first link wasn’t behind a paywall and talks exactly about what OP mentioned, actually it’s a horrible read and while apparently everyone (Germans, French, British, …) was just busy fighting a war they didn’t really care about, Canadians were on a mission to slaughter Germans for whatever reason.

          • @huginn@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            147 months ago

            Not op - as far as I can tell they weren’t particularly warcrimey for WW2.

            They killed a bunch of German POWs during the invasion of Sicily and killed 20 civilians while burning down a town for a supposed civilian killing a commander (turned out it was an enemy combatant).

            Both deeply abhorrent but not “inventing new crimes”

            • Icalasari
              link
              fedilink
              37 months ago

              Yeah, I got which world war mixed up. Been a while since I looked into it

  • Media Bias Fact CheckerB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -117 months ago
    Media Bias/Fact Check - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for Media Bias/Fact Check:

    MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Very High - United States of America
    Wikipedia about this source

    New York Times - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for New York Times:

    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
    Wikipedia about this source

    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-times/
    https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/17/world/middleeast/israel-hezbollah-pagers-explosives.html

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • @El_guapazo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    727 months ago

    How do we know these were actual terrorists and not just random people that bought a pager?

    They’ve classified infants as Hamas terrorists before so I’m a bit skeptical.

    • cartoon meme dog
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -137 months ago

      One can reasonably assume they studied the communications for a few weeks to figure out who’s who, and then sent the detonate code to a certain list of pager numbers.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness
      link
      fedilink
      197 months ago

      I mean the people carrying the pagers were likely with Hezbollah, but the 2750 people injured? Yeah no.

    • @Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      47 months ago

      It’s worth noting that Hezbollah members aren’t just militant fighters. There are also social services and Parliamentary members

      Hezbollah organizes and maintains an extensive social development program and runs hospitals, news services, educational facilities, and encouragement of Nikah mut’ah. One of its established institutions, Jihad Al Binna’s Reconstruction Campaign, is responsible for numerous economic and infrastructure development projects in Lebanon. Hezbollah controls the Martyr’s Institute (Al-Shahid Social Association)

      Hezbollah holds 14 of the 128 seats in the Parliament of Lebanon and is a member of the Resistance and Development Bloc. According to Daniel L. Byman, it is “the most powerful single political movement in Lebanon.” Hezbollah, along with the Amal Movement, represents most of Lebanese Shi’a. Unlike Amal, Hezbollah has not disarmed. Hezbollah participates in the Parliament of Lebanon.

    • @Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      527 months ago

      The splodey ones all came from the same batches that were bought by Hezbolla-linked companies and distributed by them to hezbolla members. They didnt just ‘upgrade’ every pager made by gold apollo. Only batches destined for Hez.

      Of course, theres undoubtedly a lot of people who ended up with one of the booby trapped batch, who are just regular doctors, nurses, workers, etc, and theres no certainty that the person who was issued the pager was holding it at the time. Could have been their kid, or wife, or whatever, so the attack was still not very discriminate.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -117 months ago

        Wasn’t the child killed by being near a pager? I don’t think it belonged to the child.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            fedilink
            English
            27 months ago

            In the context of:

            How do we know these were actual terrorists and not just random people that bought a pager?

            Yes, it matters. Because it suggests it wasn’t a random person that bought a pager.

            In the context of the morality of the situation, no, it doesn’t matter. It was not a moral act.

  • Moah
    link
    fedilink
    English
    337 months ago

    Who is a terrorist state exactly?

      • @iAvicenna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        27 months ago

        with Israel clearly having the greater outreach, destructive power and perhaps even less self regulation than Hezbollah as it seems.

      • xor
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -137 months ago

        And, frankly, this is one of the least morally concerning things Israel has (presumably) done. The pagers were targeted specifically because they were used almost exclusively by Hezbollah.

        • @iAvicenna@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          probably more civilians than the targeted number of Hezbollah militant members died, orders of magnitude more wounded, crippled etc. success?

        • @WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Dude they injured thousands of people and killed children and health care workers. This is 100% terrorism. I guess it’s a better than the active genocide they’re doing though, so it’s a low bar.

        • @Count042@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          47 months ago

          They were not exclusively used by Hezbollah.

          Also, you’re equating a government with it’s militant wing.

          Is it proper to call an Israeli Doctor a member of IDF? That is what you are doing.

          Hospital administrators (A government position for non insane countries) are Hezbollah.

          • xor
            link
            fedilink
            English
            37 months ago

            Yeah that’s a fair point wrt non-militant roles, my assumption was that they were primarily used in the military since their purpose was to avoid the issues with mobile networks being used to track them.

            But we don’t know exactly how the devices were distributed, so you’re right that there were potentially a large number of non-military Hezbollah staff.

            • @Count042@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -2
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              They’ve been doing the same for Hamas. Hospital administrator? Hamas. And so Israel bombs out their apartment killing them and their entire family. You know, back when there were apartments.

              Same for police.

              That one is what gives away Israels genocidal intent. Getting rid of police gets rid of the first line of defense against civil disorder, and the people most likely to do stuff like distribute food and supplies.

              Police very rarely end up fighting as militantsin occupied countries, too. Unless you fire them en masse, which occupying countries shouldn’t do, if they’re smart.

              Edit: We do know multiple EMT teams and doctors were hit by the beepers.

  • @werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    27 months ago

    Why should we all not expect our next Amazon device to be just a friendly brick with an ad on it?

    Because, unless you can easily open the thing to see inside, there’s enough space in side of all new phones to blow our leg or our faces off apparently.

    Now thanks to this, phones don’t fly. So hey, you’re going to Hawaii? Better ship your phone separately on time so it gets there before you do. You want flights to be safe and not full of these dangerous bricks. Ofcourse, screw the mail man who will have to drive from the Continental United States over to Hawaii. It’s a water truck… details details…

    Should I buy a new device for my kids and or family or myself? Nope unless the thing is transparent like an iMac.

    An iMac is an old model personal computer sold by Apple, where the chassis was mostly translucent with bright colors.

    • Dr. Moose
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -17 months ago

      This is crazy that we tolerate such a breach of social trust.

  • @Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    38
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Imagine if everyone’s phone exploded to execute like 10 guys.

    Edit: The take aways here are

    1. Israel is a terrorist nation, that views civilian casualties as bonus points

    2. any country who imports their electronics instead of making their own is susceptible to this kind of tampering.

    3. The press is covering a terror attack like its some kind of new video game

    4. All the unexploded ordinance can be delivered to Hezbollah as a gift. If the rumor is true that this was triggered because they became aware of the bombs, there will likely be many israelis killed by these explosives in the near future.

  • @TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    80
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    You could tell Israel did it by the wanton disregard of civilian casualties and the lack of a global governmental backlash against the act.

    What I’m surprised is that were able to get them to believe the propaganda that pagers would be a much more secure communication medium.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      197 months ago

      The articles keep repeating “Hezbollah”, but the target of the attack appears to have been the Iranian ambassador to Lebanon.

      Much like the US bombing of an Iraqi airfield to kill the Iranian diplomatic delegation to Baghdad, this appears to be an entirely illegal and recklessly deployed assassination plot aimed at one guy. The thousands of injuries and the eight dead (at least two being children under the age of 11) are just collateral damage the IDF has once again blanket-tagged as “Evil Muslim Militants”.

      • @TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        87 months ago

        That article doesn’t really indicate that one person was the target, nor does making 3000 pagers or whatever they were into bombs. I find it more likely that the Iranian delegation representative was just meeting with Hezbollah at the time or received one of their pagers to stay in communication. Nothing in the articles you link suggests this was done just to target them, just that they were affected.

    • TimeSquirrel
      link
      fedilink
      77 months ago

      They are anything but. Somebody with a laptop and a $20 USB SDR stick can see every piece of text flying though the air.

      • capital
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        They might be in regards to emanation.

        It’s funny how confident comments like these are without really thinking it though.

        • TimeSquirrel
          link
          fedilink
          17 months ago

          Go ahead, explain yourself then, since you seem to think I’m some sort of idiot. Because I have actually done this. And no vague psuedointellectual nonsense, technical details please. Frequencies, protocols, software, that sort of thing. Let’s hear your experience in the field.

          • capital
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            My brother in christ, you are still missing the point.

            So you pick up a message that reads “867-5309” and the receiver picks up their landline and calls.

            So you have a phone number now. One that you probably already had given the organization we’re talking about. If the call is staying landline and within the boundaries of their country, you aren’t picking up shit with your SDR. You need to have a physical tap somewhere.

            They swapped cell phones which send and receive for pagers that receive only. Think for 2 seconds what that means for tracking. To say nothing of also losing the fucking microphone, camera, GPS…

            There’s a reason pagers are allowed into SCIFs where phones and other devices which send are not.

            There’s more to security than your experience picking up unencrypted shit with an SDR.

            • TimeSquirrel
              link
              fedilink
              17 months ago

              I appreciate your explanation. Thank you. The point was, I’d have liked to see a comment like that from the start instead of the snarkiness. I tend to get irritated when people just insult each other going “nuh-uh” without any substance. Nobody learns shit that way. If somebody is wrong, just correct them.

              • capital
                link
                fedilink
                English
                0
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                I brought up emanations in my first reply…

                I even couched it with a “might be” because I’m aware there’s lots I don’t know.

                It wasn’t that you may be wrong. It was your overconfidence and hyper-fixation on one type of security.

              • @Bennettiquette@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                07 months ago

                with all respect, i think if you reread the original comment you might find it reads in a less vindictive tone than you originally read it in. text can be notoriously bad at conveying the difference between a generalized chuckle and a targeted insult, especially when the reader has experience or passion in the topic.

    • @assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27 months ago

      I agree, but they probably could’ve worded it better. The pagers were meant for Hezbollah but that doesn’t mean they exclusively went to Hezbollah.

      • @nonailsleft@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -57 months ago

        So true. Could you imagine being in Hezbollah and not giving your personal Hezbollah-issued one-way pager away to someone else?

        • @assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          57 months ago

          It depends a lot on how the pagers are distributed. Is it a batch that was carefully delivered to only Hezbollah members? Is that where all the pagers from that batch went?

          It’s not like the pagers are stamped with “for Hezbollah only”. I’m concerned how they were all distributed.

    • @catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27 months ago

      I assume they use the cell phone network these days, so any in flight probably weren’t able to receive the signal. On board but not at elevation is a pretty small window, so the number could be as small as zero.

    • @theyoyomaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Depending on what airports they tried to go through they likely would have been caught. Even garbage security theater like the TSA catches concealed explosives fairly well.

        • @theyoyomaster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          77 months ago

          I feel like it would be pretty quickly determined that you are the “victim” in that scenario. I have actually carried explosives through a TSA checkpoint before though; it was the BEST LAYOVER EVER. They came to the lounge I was in asking for volunteers to train the dogs and then handed me a backpack with semtex in it and put me in line. The dog found me, I told him he was a GOOD BOY and got to throw his kong for him and rub his belly. 45/10, would layover again.

          • @FarFarAway@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            27 months ago

            That happen to a person in our group in Australia, but with cocaine. We were waiting to collect our baggage before customs. The officers told them to put it in thier waistline and see if the dog would sniff it out. Pups was sucessful and got some pets. He didn’t have a Kong tho.