Donald Trump flirted with the idea of being president for three terms – a clear violation of the US constitution – during a bombastic speech for the National Rifle Association in which he vowed to reverse gun safety measures green-lighted during the Biden administration.

“You know, FDR 16 years – almost 16 years – he was four terms. I don’t know, are we going to be considered three-term? Or two-term?” The ex-president and GOP presidential frontrunner said to the organization’s annual convention in Dallas, prompting some in the crowd to yell “three!” Politico reported.

Trump has floated a third term in past comments, even mentioning a prolonged presidency while campaigning in 2020. He has also tried distancing himself from this idea, telling Time magazine in April: “I wouldn’t be in favor of it at all. I intend to serve four years and do a great job.”

  • @Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    391 year ago

    So let’s see here, Trump is 77 years old, but will be 78 at the time of election. Let’s just add eight years and we get 86… yep he’s angling for president for life.

    • @Huschke@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      231 year ago

      “Let me tell you, folks, it’s so true. Just like Putin, right? It’s unbelievable. We start with 3, then we go to 4, and then 5. It’s all about strength, and nobody knows strength like me. We’re talking about a progression, a strategy. Just like Putin does, so smart. You have to move step by step, building power. That’s how you win, that’s how you get things done. Trust me, it works.”

      Trump in one of his rallies (probably)

  • @FakeGreekGirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2531 year ago

    And that’s a big part of why, despite everything Biden is doing, I am 100% voting for him. Because if Biden wins, there will be a 2028 election where we can hopefully find someone better, and I’m not convinced that there will be under Trump.

    Four years of Trump came really close to turning this country into a kakistocratic dictatorship. I really don’t want to give him another chance.

    • @Suavevillain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -81 year ago

      People say we can find someone better next time and still vote for yell for everyone to vote for every Neoliberal like Biden when they show up on the ballot. The lesser evil route is what got us here now.

      • @lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “Where we are now” is nowhere near as bad as things could be. Nazi Germany, Mussolini’s Italy, and Franco’s Spain all happened. Equally bad things could happen here, and in fact they have happened here. Remember how half this country’s economy was based on chattel slavery and it led to a bloody civil war? And how there was a genocide of the indigenous population? Is that what you want? Because that’s the kind of shit we’re in for if we let the fascists win.

    • @jettrscga@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      431 year ago

      Despite what that Biden’s doing exactly? I’ve heard about Israel weapon sales that are now being forced through by republicans as well. What else?

    • @retrospectology@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -44
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Why on earth would you think democrats would allow for someone better in 2028? Biden’s win will prove that they can continue propping up fascist extremists and you’ll vote for fascist lite.

      You’re not describing a strategy, you’re describing a slow death.

      • Anise (they/she)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Voting for Biden is harm reduction. Not voting is just letting the GOP win and voting for Trump is a dumb idea.

      • @zbyte64@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        I don’t even expect Democrats to “learn their lesson” by loosing an election, let alone reform democracy.

        • @Facebones@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          They made it clear in 2016, they’d rather the Republicans win than give even an INCH to the left of mid right establishment dems.

      • @Facebones@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        -18
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Hard agree. I’m tired of people saying the only way to avoid fascism is the guy who

        • sidestepped congress multiple times to fund/supply genocide,

        • is pushing legislation to strip leftist orgs of nonprofit status,

        • pushing legislation to make ANY criticism of Israel legally antisemitic so they can strip any college that allows protests of funding and accreditation

        • coming from a party that at the slightest whiff of a challenge had it legally ruled that they do what they want, voters and donors be damned

        • also a party equally complicit in moving the goalposts any time a third party comes close to meeting requirements for inclusion.

        America has always been fascist, ruled by a singular corporate party with two wings. The quiet part is out loud now and even prominent democrats and pundits can’t help themselves but break out all the fascist stops on leftists.

        When democrats and liberals say “we have to stop fascism” they mean “we have to protect my status quo and the fascism that benefits me.”

        • @Suavevillain@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It most comes down to maintaining comfort. Liberals have no issue with groups being harmed by state violence from police and other groups when they aren’t the targets. Dems had 4 years to prepare and look forward to what is coming, and the best we have is Joe Biden standing between the status quo and Trump’s full-blown fascism.

          • @Facebones@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            They like to ignore that dems have had a few opportunities with the trifecta to actually codify these issues and enact stronger policies against the threats we face now (that were apparent at the time) but the problem is democrats don’t WANT to lock those basic rights issues down because they need the existential threat. Their only platform for like 20 years now has been “not those guys” so if they actually codified (for example) abortion or even better added it to an amendment - They wouldn’t be able to push this narrative that if you don’t vote for milquetoast mid right Biden then you’re actually WORSE than the fascists and you hate women and you’re handing their freedom to “”“the right”“” on a silver platter.

            America has always been a single corporate party system, and both wings of that party are pushing for fascism because it’s the end goal of any capitalist system. It’s just a fight between “marginalized folk are slowly and quietly suppressed so my life continues as normal” fascism or “quiet part out loud day one which I would have to acknowledge” fascism.

        • @retrospectology@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -161 year ago

          I’ll take the lack of an argument as a confirmation that you understand what I said is true. Anyone who’s been alive for more than a single election has witnessed it, it’s pretty undeniable.

      • @FakeGreekGirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        281 year ago

        Even so, still better than a perpetual Trump dictatorship.

        If Trump wins, he will, without a doubt, try again to end American democracy. He did before. And whatever you think of our current situation, at least we have a fucking voice right now.

        • @retrospectology@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -21
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s likely not better though, as the longer we let Dmeocrats play dick-grab with the GOP without actually fighting back tooth and nail (like politician’s like Biden are unwilling to do) the more the GOP is able to use their power in a way that’s concealed.

          The reason RvW had a political effect is because it was shocking and too sudden. What will happen if we keep voting the lesser of two evils is people will get more and more acclimated to having their rights stripped away in small ways, rather than witnessing the horror in a way that’s easy to understand.

          Even now, in this discussion, it’s difficult for you to see the pattern that’s occurring from the strategy you’re proposing of fear-based voting.

          It’s uncertain whether a Trump term will allow for the GOP to enact their fascist take-over in full, but continuing to vote for the same milque-toast democrats is 100% a recipe for fascism because they will never reform on their own, and the general public will accept fascism if it comes slowly. I’m not going to try to tell you how to vote, but just own the consequences when they come and don’t try to blame others.

          • @FakeGreekGirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            25
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You seem to still be thinking in terms of Trump doing a term and going away. He won’t. He proved that on 1/6/2021, and his little jokes and musings now only reinforce it.

            I have every expectation that, if Trump manages to become President again, he is not leaving that office until he dies. He will undo American democracy to keep his power. He already tried before.

            Biden sucks. Democrats suck. You won’t catch me arguing with you there. But Trump is the death of the Republic.

    • @ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      -461 year ago

      there will be a 2028 election where we can hopefully find someone better

      I’ve literally had people utter this to me before every single presidential election that I’ve voted in and it’s never come true. Neither party has any incentive to improve things when they’re guaranteed to get votes because “the other guys are boogeymen!”

      • Dark Arc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        221 year ago

        Trump can’t be both “different from everyone else” and “everyone’s worries about the guy are unfounded, he’s just another politician.”

        While I know you didn’t say he’s the same, per se, you might as well by comparing alarms that Obama or Romney are going to be forever presidents to the guy literally “joking” about being a forever president that’s taken possibly criminal steps to subvert the results of an election already.

        It’s not just the fringe paranoid folks saying “this could be the end of democracy as we know it if Trump wins.”

      • @barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        221 year ago

        Donald did do an insurrection on his way out in 2021. Oh, did you not vote in 2016? Maybe you are technically correct.

      • @AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        If Biden wins, then in 2028 he won’t be able to run again, and Trump won’t physically be able to. I’m reasonably confident there will be two “new” choices.

        I’m very happy DeSantis seems to have crashed and burned, Christie had his last hurrah, and no one took Ramiswami seriously, but even Sanders’ age is a passing of the torch.

        So, will you support Harris, Newsom, or AOC to go up against Abbot?

        • @ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          I’d support AOC but Newsom or Harris are more “status quo” Dems so they’ll probably get all the backing from the party in order to prevent a progressive from getting the nomination once again.

      • @FakeGreekGirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        So when Trump pulls another January 6, but succeeds this time and declares himself president for life, do you think that will make the situation better or worse?

        • @ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          -41 year ago

          That’d be quite the feat considering we have the Constitution and Congress. How do you suppose he’d succeed at this considering Trump and Co were basically laughed out of every courtroom when they brought their election fraud cases to court? He doesn’t need to be president for another Jan 6 to happen. He just needs a microphone and a big crowd of pissed off smooth-brains.

          • @FakeGreekGirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Who needs courts when you have a cult of personality, a lot of whom have organized into paramilitary groups?

            Even now, the courts are failing to hold him responsible for what he did. They won’t save us. And half of Congress is on his fucking side.

            • @ShepherdPie@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              -31 year ago

              If paramilitary groups are how he seizes control of the government, then it doesn’t really matter whether he was elected or not because you’re talking about outright treason and a civil war, neither of which are predicated on him being elected to office first.

              How can you say “who needs courts” when the courts already shot his election fraud nonsense down in every single case they tried to bring? The trial for J6 has barely begun so how can you claim the outcome already? He was already convicted in the NY civil fraud trial.

              Maybe you should ask yourself why the guy who’s running against him can’t even be bothered to shape himself up when, as you claim, we’re on the verge of far-right paramilitary groups staging a coup if he doesn’t win? How shitty at your job do you have to be that you can’t even win against that?

              • @FakeGreekGirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                41 year ago

                You’re preaching to the choir here. Biden is shit. But, again, at least I know he’ll go away in 4 years. Trump is going to try his damnedest not to. He already fucking tried once. And frankly, the fact that it’s been four years and he’s free to try again is proof enough the courts aren’t doing enough to stop him. There’s a reason they’ve been pushing all this stuff until after election.

                Open your eyes and stop pretending Trump is normal. In nearly 250 years that this country has existed, nobody has tried to pull the shit he’s tried to pull, and he will try it again.

        • @acetanilide@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          My concern is that he will run again and again until he dies. Ideally if he won this year he could never run again. Obviously he’s a fascist so he will probably try to stay in (again) but man I am not looking forward to the next 20-50 years of him. And I’m guessing he’s going to live forever at this point.

          • @AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            91 year ago

            Trump has visibly diminished in the last 4 years, as has his influence. Now he seems like the tail the dog is wagging but before he called himself the dog. I just don’t see him lasting that long

          • @Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            81 year ago

            20-50 years??? How young do you think trump is??? 50 years from now he would be 127! 20 years from now he would 97.

            We’re not going to have even 5 years of trump left. Even if he wins and serves a full term. I may be wrong, but I don’t imagine him living to 83.

              • @Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                For a half second I thought you were calling trump the clay rock superhero from the fantastic four.

                I may have only thought it for a half second, but I’m still already making popcorn. Because of how entertaining it would be to watch you explain how trump is The Thing.

                • @acetanilide@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  2
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I hope you have your popcorn! I outsourced the explanation though.

                  Imagine Donald Trump as The Thing from the Fantastic Four: an oversized, lumbering figure with an unmistakable, gaudy orange, rock-like exterior. His presence is hard to ignore, not just because of his sheer size and brashness but because he bulldozes through political and social norms with little finesse, much like The Thing smashing through walls.

                  In this form, Trump’s bluntness and tendency to overpower conversations mirror The Thing’s raw physicality. His speeches are repetitive and simplistic, hammering his points home in a manner akin to The Thing’s catchphrase, “It’s clobberin’ time!”—straightforward and unsubtle.

                  However, just as The Thing struggles with his monstrous appearance, Trump’s public persona is marked by a mix of bravado and thin-skinned sensitivity. His abrasive approach often alienates allies and emboldens critics, making his interactions as rocky as his hypothetical exterior. Both figures are defined by their confrontational nature, but where The Thing’s battles are physical, Trump’s are rhetorical and often divisive.

      • @LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        211 year ago

        There are generally better things happening under democratic rule than republican rule. I get that it can feel small to those of us who want more radical change but there is a difference.

        But I agree. Radical change is probably not happening from within the current system. Direct action and external pressure will be needed. But there is still a difference in how tolerant the two parties (and also between intra-party factions) will be of such a movement.

  • @UmeU@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    521 year ago

    Ok hear me out…

    Trump wants to be a dictator, sure. He was a terrible president and it would be a disaster if he was reelected.

    Now that you know my position, listen to what he said at the NRA convention. He wasn’t saying ‘hey maybe I’ll serve 3 terms’… what he was saying was ‘if I get elected in 2024 then would that be two terms or three terms? Because we all know I was elected to a second term back in 2020 and so even though Biden is acting president, I am in my second term now, so a win in 2024 is a third term.’

    The man is an idiot and rambled incoherently throughout the NRA speech. He reiterated his usual batch of racist xenophobic statements and bragged about his uncle at MIT… he is a one trick pony and there is plenty to poke fun at.

    Would he tout the idea of a third term for himself? Sure! Is that what he did in this case, not precisely.

    • @jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      11
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Exactly. Of course, by putting forth the belief that 2020-2024 was his second term, he should just bow out since he has also said he would not want to challenge the 22nd amendment.

    • FartsWithAnAccent
      link
      fedilink
      291 year ago

      That would never happen: These brave 2A champions have completely banned firearms from these conventions for security reasons.

    • @Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      221 year ago

      It’s my biggest gripe against the left. Imagine betting your life on a game of football where one side is playing no contact tag rules and the other is playing full lethality death ball rules. We’ll sit here and talk about how they’re not playing fair, but pride parades won’t march with guns. We’ll cry about how horrid it is that they force their religion into our schools but we won’t use the same system to fight it.

      The left will die for their beliefs, but the right will kill for them. Only one of those methods leaves survivors.

      • @grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        121 year ago

        As the saying goes, “go far enough left and you get your guns back.” It’s not leftists clutching pearls over “gun violence;” it’s privileged centrist liberals (a.k.a. MLK’s “white moderates”) doing that.

        • @aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -21 year ago

          Lol clutching pearls… What a laughably terrible way to describe people who are often burying their children or schoolmates and trying to prevent others from having to do the same.

  • @Nastybutler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    21 year ago

    What it sounds like to me, and apparently only me, is that he is saying here he is currently running for his third term since he “won” in 2020. Of course he has made comments before about how he likes how Putin and Xi keep getting to stay in power and wished he could do that, but it would help his cause if he could win the popular vote just once over his lame opponents.

    Imagine if Democrats actually nominated someone worth voting for rather than just us voting against Trump. But I guess that’s too much to ask for.

    • @AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 year ago

      He has also said his first term shouldn’t count because he was impeached. Never give him the benefit of the doubt.

    • @LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      121 year ago

      I mean the allusion to FDR seems pretty clearly connected to the idea of further future terms. Trump always phrases these things in a way so he has plausible deniability. But the subtext is obvious if you pay attention.

  • @werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -41 year ago

    He read that in the morning and misspoke. And that’s how you get old people to say funny things.

    Maybe have younger people running for president?