The U.S. Secret Service is in the business of protecting the president, whether he’s inside the Oval Office or visiting a foreign war zone.

But protecting a former president in prison? The prospect is unprecedented. That would be the challenge if Donald J. Trump — whom the agency is required by law to protect around the clock — is convicted at his criminal trial in Manhattan and sentenced to serve time.

Even before the trial’s opening statements, the Secret Service was in some measure planning for the extraordinary possibility of a former president behind bars. Prosecutors had asked the judge in the case to remind Mr. Trump that attacks on witnesses and jurors could land him in jail even before a verdict is rendered.

MBFC
Archive

  • I would love to be the USSS person in charge of logistics for this.

    I don’t know why. It would be like a strategy/sim game.

    All the other agents have different attributes, and the conditions at the prison change during the day.

    I’ve already put too much thought into it and I have no idea why I find it interesting.

    • oo1
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      yeah Syndicate!

      Dumb VIPs walking into range of my agent with maxed out red-bar and a gauss gun .

      • @Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        The Persuadertron was fun. You could scoop up the whole level on some of them, which my poor old Amiga really struggled with.

        • oo1
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          legions of brainwashed drones roaming around blasting off assault rifles randomly in an expansion called american revolt. . . did this get back on-topic?

          yeah persuedertron was pretty much my plan A on most levels - at least when i replayed it a few years ago on a decent computer. A nice layer of human shields.

    • @treefrog@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      But not for the judge.

      One of the reasons he’s being found in contempt is for making threatening comments on social media. Jail stops that behavior. House arrest does not.

  • Other countries have jailed their leaders. If you’re a felon and get jailed as a former President I figure you should lose everything, SS protection, any pension and any benefits are gone too. Why should a jailed president get those things?

    • @model_tar_gz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      I don’t like it any more than you do. But a former president is still a very significant national security concern. Assassination is quite honestly the most minor concern there is for a former president. Extortion, blackmail, sabotage, espionage, all these things (and more) become a viable threat once USSS protection is gone. There’s a reason why we protect our former POTUS.

  • KillingTimeItself
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -31 year ago

    i vote that we just kill the president if they get arrested, it solves more than one problem 🤷

  • Jaysyn
    link
    fedilink
    60
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Trump will not go to a normal prison / gen pop, etc. Toss that thought from your mind.

    Trump will die in a shitty military barracks on a shitty military base where he has no internet connection, access to him can be easily controlled & he can’t blab state secrets.

    There is already a precedent here with Nixon’s lawyer.

    • @Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Other than your first sentence, this is pure fantasy. He’ll never go far enough to trigger actual accountability from those that matter…

      • Jaysyn
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I remember when that line was “they’ll never indict an ex-President”.

        Trump is going to die in Federal custody if he doesn’t win re-election.

        There is not a single example of the DoJ spending this amount of money & manpower to say “oh well”.

        • @Empricorn@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I hope you’re right. Not because I care that much about Trump, but because laws matter. You can’t expect people to follow them when one person can brazenly flout them with zero consequences…

    • @a4ng3l@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      331 year ago

      Is it only about protecting him or also avoiding him discussing unwanted topics with other inmates in that case? He’s still the recipient of privileged information…

        • @FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          91 year ago

          Semantically, according to US Legal Code you can’t commit treason without being at war, and war has not been properly defined by the federal government.

        • @jordanlund@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          161 year ago

          If he was going to face treason charges, they would have brought it as part of the January 6 trial.

          Those charges are:

          https://www.npr.org/2023/08/01/1191493880/trump-january-6-charges-indictment-counts

          one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States applies to Trump’s repeated and widespread efforts to spread false claims about the November 2020 election while knowing they were not true and for allegedly attempting to illegally discount legitimate votes all with the goal of overturning the 2020 election, prosecutors claim in the indictment.

          one count of conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding was brought due to the alleged organized planning by Trump and his allies to disrupt the electoral vote’s certification in January 2021.

          one count of obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding is tied to Trump and his co-conspirators’ alleged efforts after the November 2020 election until Jan. 7, 2021, to block the official certification proceeding in Congress.

          one count of conspiracy against rights refers to Trump and his co-conspirators alleged attempts to “oppress, threaten and intimidate” people in their right to vote in an election.

        • @Varyk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          331 year ago

          Yet. The electors scheme that dumps directly participated in to conspire with election officials to forge and mail in false elector documents is still undergoing investigation and, with new updates every month from Republicans giving information to the authorities.

          This is the one that I thought would be the most likely of causing him serious legal trouble, but this happened across seven states with an unknown number but around a dozen election officials that agreed to forge documents at Trump’s and his team’s request and then send in the documents to trick the national archives and pence into falsely certifying Trump as the president-elect in the 2020 election.

          It’s batshit insane, and he was directly involved, and multiple people can corroborate that. The doj the FBI, some of those Republican collaborators are already working with them, I check in every couple weeks just to see what the latest news is.

          The investigations and prosecutions by individual states and government agencies are ongoing, so prosecution of trump is still very much on the table, but only when all of the circumstances and information available has been organized and arrayed, and all of the smaller fish have been targeted and dealt with first.

          As of March 2024, the Arizona AG is said that they’re nearing the end of their investigation.

          But that’s one state of seven. And there’s also the FBI and the doj investigating this, so there’s a lot going on.

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_fake_electors_plot

      • @girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        161 year ago

        Nope.

        Under current United States federal law, all former presidents are entitled to lifetime protection from the Secret Service. Barring an act of Congress or a presidential executive order, the Secret Service is bound by law to protect former presidents for life. There aren’t any exceptions listed in the statute governing the protection of former presidents. Source

        • @Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          91 year ago

          Barring an act of Congress or a presidential executive order

          Could definitely imagine Congress and/or Biden doing that to make sure that Secret Service agents aren’t sent to prison for crimes they didn’t commit…

          • @ours@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            They wouldn’t be condemned to prison, they would work in a prison. The logistics would have to be worked out but I guess they would work alongside the prison guards and have agents constantly around prisoner Orange. It would suck for them but they would be normal rotations/breaks and such.

    • @Wanderer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      01 year ago

      Surely they will build him his own prison or convert his house into a prison.

      Like I get it if he needs to go to jail than so be it. But let’s be real, he can’t actually go to prison.

  • SeaJ
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    The answer to questions in headlines is damn near always ‘no.’

  • Subverb
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    And this is why Trump will never see the inside of a jail cell. The logistics are completely unprecedented and unworkable. At most he’ll get house arrest, and personally, I doubt even that.

    • @samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      That’s not the reason why. It would be trivially easy to remove all his privileges if he were convicted of a crime. The reason is because the system is corrupt.