With a electoral system like Ranked Choice voting, people would feel safe to vote for whomsoever they wish, as their vote would still be counted even if their preference didn’t win.

Just search for videos on FPTP voting if you want an explanation on how and why the spoiler effect exists.

Electoral reform is possible in each individual state (for now), we dont need federal reform! Maine and Alaska have already passed electoral reform.

Republicans are moving to make alternative electoral systems illegal in their states. Republicans LOVE first past the post voting. Just sbsolutely adore it. Why would you want to use the same voting system republicans want?

More political parties means a higher percentage of the population is represented by their choices in the voting booth. More people involved in the electoral process, more people engaged.

Its a win win win all around for not just the people, but also for the democratic party. More people voting means more democratic votes. The numbers dont lie. So what’s the hold up blue states?

Some day we will be able to vote for who best represents our interests. We won’t need to grovel on our knees, begging for representationin government. We won’t need to wait for the Republican party to stop existing.

We can do it right now. We don’t have to get over a damn thing. If anyone needs to get over themselves, it would be the democrats who assume they are the only way forward.

Consider starting a campaign to change how we vote in your own state! Force our representatives to compete with fresh outside ideas. We deserve the best representation, not excuses.

  • Noxy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    501 year ago

    shut the fuck up forever hillary

  • Snot Flickerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    55
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    OK Boomer.


    I’m voting for Biden but I’m not obligated to be excited or happy about it or to not critique it for the DNC. It’s a choice between a lawful neutral (at best) milquetoast waffling imperial fuckhead and an outright chaotic evil dictatorial megalomaniac imperial fuckhead. One choice is clearly superior but that’s the choice that’s also dangling the more dangerous choice over me like a threat as the only reason to vote for them. That’s pretty fucking abusive, if you ask me.

    Talking down to voters with stuff like “Why don’t you go run for something, then?” worked out so well for her before, right?

    • South Park called it long ago and it still fits. It fits with Hillary and Trump back in 2016 and today. It’s a choice between a shit sandwich and a douche bag. They just missed the part where one is hell bent on destroying our democracy and then added a season with Mr Garrison as president.

      Now we are repeating history and might put “Garrison” in charge again. I never liked history but I didn’t think we were this dumb it hasn’t even been a decade but that’s more to do with brain washing

    • Boozilla
      link
      fedilink
      English
      221 year ago

      Well said. The two front runners are like creepy old lords from Game of Thrones or something. One is much worse, but neither is good.

      The Clintons need to retire quietly, nobody wants their input.

      • @kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        One is much worse, but neither is good.

        Given that one of them will be president after the election, it should be obvious that preventing the much worse option is in everyone’s best interest.

        • @msage@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          It’s like the fucking Trolley problem, but blaming the entire setup on the person next to the switch.

          Who put that person there? Why are we shifting the blame on them? Stop the trolley, don’t act all smug pointing fingers screaming “noone normal would let the trolley go straight”.

    • norbert
      link
      fedilink
      14
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Rich old bat, nobody cares; she might not be first for the guillotine but she’s definitely in the queue.

      • Silverseren
        link
        fedilink
        -251 year ago

        What political side even are you? I assume some far left tankie idiocy.

        • Aniki 🌱🌿
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -51 year ago

          Taking sides in politics is just about the most pointless thing you can possibly do with your existence on this earth. They don’t know you. No one cares. It’s not a team sport.

        • @GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -61 year ago

          They don’t like to hear it, because the guillotine jokes are comforting to them, but calling for the mass execution of undesirables (no matter the flavor) is the most authoritarian loving thing there is. 100% tankie shit.

          There are massive changes that need to happen in the west, but revolt and execution are not it.

          They are just hoping they’ll be in the “in” crowd when the violence starts, not realizing that by a small whim of chance, they could actually be the ones being hunted. Wouldn’t be a comforting joke then.

  • @Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    She did try to pander to us with this gem of a phrase, “I don’t know who created Pokémon Go, but I want to figure out how to get them to have Pokémon Go to the polls”

  • @inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    105
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Two things can be true at the same time.

    1. She is a target of mysgonstic flavored consisparcy theories.

    2. She truly is unlikeable with half measure policies while being woefully out of touch with the average person.

      • Cethin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        261 year ago

        It’s easy to be more qualified than totally unqualified. She was the obvious choice, but her total lack of charisma to voters destroyed that.

        • @Garbanzo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          241 year ago

          The worst part is that more people voted for her, just not where it counts because she couldn’t be bothered to campaign there

          • Makhno
            link
            fedilink
            131 year ago

            Yeah, cause she’s an elitist piece of shit, which makes her unqualified to anyone with a fuckin brain.

              • @bl_r@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                61 year ago

                As shitty as this sounds, does it matter whether or not she won the popular vote if that was not the metric for winning?

                She, a career politician, should know that and her strategy was lacking.

                • Oh, for sure, she should have had a better strategy. I don’t disagree that she ran a terrible campaign. But OP said “more people voted for her” despite her bad strategy, which is true and frankly should have been a national point of months of protests. But instead, the person I responded to implied it doesn’t matter because she’s [insert stereotypical Clinton hate vomit].

                  It does matter. She did get more votes. That is in fact a fairer and more just way of representing a national vote for a national/Federal position. We all know there’s an electoral college. But there absolutely shouldn’t be because it inherently counts some votes as more valuable than others, which is frankly incompatible with democracy. So yes, that definitely matters.

              • Makhno
                link
                fedilink
                2
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Cause people are idiots…?

                And she stole the election from Bernie…?

            • LeadersAtWork
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              Still more qualified than the woefully unqualified, elitist trash that is Trump. Lol

              • Makhno
                link
                fedilink
                41 year ago

                Sure, but that doesn’t negate the fact that Dem shills are dumb as fuck too, just not blatantly malicious like Republicans

      • @CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        101 year ago
        1. She should have run on a platform that was better than “What else are you going to do, vote for Trump?”
  • @CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    231 year ago

    Alternative headline: Hillary Clinton hasn’t learned her lesson that she is tone deaf and should stay the fuck out of politics.

  • SeaJ
    link
    fedilink
    681 year ago

    She really just needs to get over herself and shut the fuck up. She lost to Trump. Why the fuck would anyone listen to her on how to beat him?

  • Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    1831 year ago

    Please go away, get out of public life and stop “helping.”

    Being a dick to people is not going to get them to vote your way. Same with the ‘deplorables’ comment. I agreed with her on it, but it was a stupid thing to say in an election.

    • @ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      331 year ago

      I think the deplorables comment would have been fine if they did try to cowardly walk it back immediately after in the typical miquetoast, ‘cater to everyone’ Democratic fashion.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
        link
        fedilink
        -221 year ago

        Maybe they wouldn’t have thought they had to if they could have counted on the left for any of the energy coming up with reasons why them not voting is everyone else’s fault.

        The white left being shocked and outraged that they in fact do not get to call themselves the base when they have to be dragged kicking and screaming by their hair just to get into a poll booth, never mind to not be a fucking moron and vote green or some shit, never ceases to amaze me.

        The Tea Party are the Republican base because they don’t have to be convinced to show up for the general you entitled fucking morons.

        • @go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          Explain something to me. How can you simultaneously believe we don’t vote but care that we don’t vote? Biden won the 2020 general election so if we didn’t vote for him then who cares if we won’t vote for him in 2024?

          So which is it?

        • @ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          141 year ago

          Oh right, when you’re running in a popularity contest and lose, it’s the fault of the people voting not your own. The fact that she couldn’t even be more appealing than a known conman, failed businessman, and reality TV host with zero political experience really says a lot.

          • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
            link
            fedilink
            -6
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            When those people voting let a fascist in, then yes, it is in fact their fault.

            If you need more convincing than “that guy is a fascist” to be doing everything in your power yes including voting you dumbass to stop him from coming to power, you’re a fucking fascist, doesn’t matter how many pride flags you cram in your bio, doesn’t matter how many times you say your Hail Marries Genocide Joes, when it came down to it you chose letting fascism win over sucking it up for someone who’s greatest sin was not delivering St. Bernard his rightful throne over something as petty as he got 3 million less fucking votes than her because you shitlord cunts don’t even turn out for your own guy.

            Bernie deserved better than you. It’s because of voters like you that the DNC has been drifting right, because why bother trying left when all they’re met with is unreliable and underperformant apathy for turnout, when playing the center gets voters who show up to the ballot without even fucking knowing all the offices that are gonna be up on it because at least they remember the whole civic duty part of their public school education!

    • Pandantic [they/them]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      281 year ago

      Yes, it’s like she took notes from her husband, but isn’t Smooth Willy enough to pull it off. I think it’s because deep down, she is just a bitch.

    • @some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      Lewis Black said her problem was that she never went away. I’d say that’s pretty spot on. Shitheads wants attention, wants to be important. Maybe if she’d given the public a break and then came back for a second act it would have been different for her. But we’re still in act one and it never ends.

    • @Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      191 year ago

      I’m still convinced that only person insufferable enough to lose to Donald fucking Trump in 2016 was Hillary Clinton.

      You can hate it all you want but in some level it’s a popularity contest and she is utterly utterly unlikeable.

      Her smarmy q&a with those millennials was a fucking PR nightmare.

  • defunct_punk
    link
    fedilink
    61 year ago

    Is she scared there won’t be anymore opportunies for $200,000 speeches if Trump gets a second term? What’s she worried about?

    • tjhart85
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Conversely, maybe she thinks there will be MORE opportunity for $200k speeches if Trump wins!

  • ReallyKinda
    link
    fedilink
    171 year ago

    Somehow I don’t think insulting people is going to get them to want to participate in your shit show