John Barnett had worked for Boeing for 32 years, until his retirement in 2017.

In the days before his death, he had been giving evidence in a whistleblower lawsuit against the company.

Boeing said it was saddened to hear of Mr Barnett’s passing. The Charleston County coroner confirmed his death to the BBC on Monday.

It said the 62-year-old had died from a “self-inflicted” wound on 9 March and police were investigating.

  • @Dasus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    181 year ago

    Boeing said it was saddened to hear of Mr Barnett’s passing.

    I’m sure they were distraught.

    This is something I thought would be on the Onion.

  • IzzyScissor
    link
    fedilink
    3461 year ago

    He was staying at a hotel out-of-state while giving evidence against Boeing.
    He was found dead in his car in the hotel parking lot from a ‘self-inflicted wound’.

    There’s really no other way to look at it logically than he was murdered by Boeing. Nothing else adds up.

    • @brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      451 year ago

      An investor could’ve threatened his family? (So not directly Boeing)

      If he got a bunch of hate online, or had crippling anxiety about the testimony he still had to give? I mean you could even speculate he thought he would be killed someday, so he took it into his own hands.

      (Please note the above is all BS!)

      I would argue the jury is still out and that we may never know.

      • @rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        An investor could’ve threatened his family? (So not directly Boeing)

        Or somebody involved in corporate corruption and embezzling in Boeing. That would be worse for Boeing as a whole than him remaining alive, but possibly better for that somebody who may not be identified.

      • @meco03211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        451 year ago

        Direct involvement might be a question still. But general involvement is absolute. If Boeing wasn’t so shitty he almost assuredly would still be alive.

        • @brbposting@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          181 year ago

          I suppose even if nobody ever said a word to him you could make that argument. No poor business practices = no testimony = no car in a hotel parking lot.

    • LeadersAtWork
      link
      fedilink
      741 year ago

      Look, I’m not gonna say Boeing did it. Though if they did, I’d bet money they drove.

    • @Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      851 year ago

      I mean, I think the logical thing to do is wait until the evidence comes out and we know for sure. It’s entirely possible he was under a lot of stress from all this and did kill himself. Now, I don’t deny that it’s a HUGE. FUCKING. CONICIDENCE. but those do happen from time to time. Its also a hell of a story, good-guy whistleblower murdered by greedy multinational aerospace company and defense contractor…during an election year…if you wrote the script nobody would buy it.

      Let’s be suspicious, but not jump to conclusions.

      • @Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Jesus, do you think maybe they’re trying to run out the clock too? Who wants to bet that a certain CEO is angling for a political position within a certain potential administration? Perhaps head of the FAA?

    • @aidan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -51 year ago

      It makes no sense for them to kill him, that draws wayyyy too much attention. More likely if they were involved, they blackmailed him and that caused him to kill himself, or another party that also wanted to keep him quiet killed him and they didn’t care if it looked like Boeing did it.

        • @force@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          151 year ago

          i’m literally sorry that you literally don’t know standard english my guy, i literally don’t know what to literally say to you 😭

        • @Aleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          921 year ago

          I don’t know what you were trying to achieve beyond publicly announcing you’re a petty, boring person.

        • @maryjayjay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          33
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Literally has been used as an intensifier for over 200 years. The Oxford English Dictionary includes a definition of literally meaning “figuratively”. Jane Austen, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Henry David Thoreau, James Fenimore Cooper, James Joyce, Charles Dickens, and Mark Twain all used it that way in their writing.

          So until you write something as well respected and enduring as Sanditon, The Great Gatsby, Tom Sawyer, or Ulysses and collect your mother fucking Nobel prize in literature, please choke on a literal dick you confidently incorrect fuckwit.

          • @Pretzilla@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Wondering if they historically used it more as in a ‘literarily’ sense and with license

            Evolving language and all that

            (I’m not trying to argue anything, just musing)

          • Riskable
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -21 year ago

            I don’t care what justification you throw out. Misuse of literally drives me figuratively insane!

          • @leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            331 year ago

            In this case literally literally did mean literally, though, not figuratively. Which makes the fuckwit even more incorrect.

        • ArxCyberwolf
          link
          fedilink
          661 year ago

          You could’ve just done so and moved on, my guy. It’s not a profound statement.

        • @Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          571 year ago

          Did he not literally volunteer?

          I mean, I get it, I’m sick of “literally” meaning “figuratively”, and I’d die on that hill with you, but this is the dumbest possible time to make that stand. In this case “literally” just means “literally”.

  • @LopensLeftArm@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    2181 year ago

    Guess the executives didn’t want to wait for him to take one of their planes and die naturally by getting sucked out at 35,000 feet when a door falls off.

  • Chaotic Entropy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    109
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m not going to say that Boeing had this guy directly killed, but I can certainly see them and their legal team explicitly trying to make his life as hellish as possible until he felt that he only had one way out. Legal threats if you stop proceeding with your case, legals threats if you don’t, they want a terrible warning for any other whistleblowers.

      • @TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        501 year ago

        A conspiracy is when a group plans to do something unlawful. So if it’s proven true it’s still a conspiracy. It just stops being a theory.

        • @Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I think the confusion arises from the secrecy part. A conspiracy is understood to be a secret unlawful activity, especially of subversive nature. When it’s not secret anymore is it still conspiracy? or is it just organised crime? I know it feels just pedantic, but this is why the media abuses words to steer collective opinion. Nowadays you can just say something is a conspiracy and people will believe it’s fake without recourse.

          • @TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            I was just being kind of funny. Language is weird and I’m pretty sure that the word conspiracy is headed through the change to mean “Crazy people think this thing is true”

            • @Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Then we need to find another word to express when people gets together to do shady shit, which happens more often than not.

              • @TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                No arguments here. I’d like to be able to differentiate between people going shady shit and flat earth believers.

      • @Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        That’s the most annoying misunderstanding. A conspiracy is still a conspiracy when you prove it happened/it’s happening. Conspirators remain conspirators, which means they were working together to do something illegal in secret. Ok, so now it’s not secret anymore, but they still conspired.

      • GladiusB
        link
        fedilink
        521 year ago

        This isn’t proof. That’s the crazy part. I hear ya. I’m with ya. I don’t see anything that is concrete physical evidence to tie it all together. As of now.

        • @Kinglink@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          441 year ago

          I agree, I just was making a joke. It’s a conspiracy until you realize it’s a fact. MK-ULTRA, Government spying on you (which time? ) , Big tobacco hiding that cigerettes cause cancer, Stacks of ET games are buried in New Mexico, even dark stories like the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiments were all conspiracy theories at one time. Sadly they all turned out to be true.

          • prole
            link
            fedilink
            English
            61 year ago

            Very few conspiracies are as dark and terrifying as (checks notes) Atari games buried in the desert.

          • @cm0002@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            501 year ago

            There’s also the conspiracy theory of conspiracy theories that the government actually likes and even spreads conspiracy theories so that the real ones get lost in the noise and written off by the general public as “just another loony conspiracy theory”

            • @Krauerking@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              131 year ago

              I like that one because I absolutely don’t like it, but it’s hard not to like and think that it’s worth being a likable conspiracy theory.
              And that’s the problem with conspiracy theories, you like to like them and then you can’t be sure.

              It’s just like that sometimes.

    • @grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      351 year ago

      If it actually happened, it’s just a “conspiracy,” not a “conspiracy theory.”

    • @EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      2191 year ago

      Eh. There will always be real conspiracies and then…lizard people conspiracies.

      This shit right here? yeah…they killed him. 100%. No doubt in my fucking mind.

      • @agent_flounder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1721 year ago

        I mean, he was old…people die—

        It said the 62-year-old had died from a “self-inflicted” wound on 9 March and police were investigating.

        oh shit they totally fucking killed him

        • @agent_flounder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          121 year ago

          Not sure what to make of this chart except that a few items are misplaced imo and I agree conspiracy shit is an alt right pipeline in most cases. Maybe it wasn’t always but whatever.

          Anyhow.

          I haven’t followed up on the news. But there sure wasn’t much available yesterday. So as far as actual reliable evidence we the public have little.

          The guy being dead with an apparent self inflicted wound (as BBC and others said) or gunshot (as Corp Crime Reporter said) during whistleblower court proceedings against a giant company is consistent with suicide from:

          • Stress of the case or from blackmail
          • Stress from something totally unrelated.
          • Some other cause (depression, terminal illness…)

          It is also consistent with:

          • murder made to look like suicide to silence his further testimony and dissuade others

          Any of these is certainly plausible at least. As is Epstein being murdered. Actually, that one is more plausible, given the few suspicious coincidences and the sheer number of people who wanted his secrets to stay that way. Whereas extra-terrestrial UFOs aren’t all that plausible based on our current body of scientific knowledge.

          • xapr [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            I agree with pretty much everything you’ve written. The only point I would like to make is that the section where the UFOs sits is the “We Have Questions” section, which is between the “Things That Actually Happened” and “Unequivocally False But Mostly Harmless” sections. I interpret this section as containing things that cannot (as of 2021) be conclusively shown to be true or false. Also note that they’re not even saying ET UFOs, but just UFOs. I think the flying saucer is just for visual flair. If I recall correctly, the person who designed this is/was an actual graphic designer.

            • gila
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Lol, they mustn’t be a great one, because their design seems to have led at least one of y’all to interpret the labels as denoting for the category below, rather than upper/lower bounds between two categories. i.e. things in the blue category above the “speculation line” label are speculative but not yet “leaving reality”

        • @Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          Epstein didn’t kill himself though. The circumstances where above the level of questioning, there were cameras turned off and he was supposedly on suicide watch.

          • xapr [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            As I much as I also believe that, there is no hard evidence (that we know of) that he didn’t kill himself. I think that’s why it’s in that section. The suspiciousness of it is through the roof, but we can’t prove it.

              • xapr [he/him]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                Right, the chart is far from perfect, but they just grouped them both under the “we have questions” section. We have lots of unresolved questions about Epstein’s death, we have lots of unresolved questions about UFO sightings.

                • @Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  21 year ago

                  No, I understand we have questions but explaining epstein requires a couple of details, while UFOs require new laws of physics.

        • ☂️-
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          this is bulshit, epstein definetly didnt kill himself, for starters.

    • SolidGrue
      link
      fedilink
      English
      581 year ago

      There are circumstances where conspiracy the likeliest explanation.

      This is one of those.

    • @Kalysta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      The Gulf of Tonkin incident being created by the US was a conspiracy theory until it wasn’t.

      Not every “conspiracy theory” is wrong. Sometimes people in charge are actually trying to cover something up. It’s not insane to be skeptical of an official line until it’s backed up with proof.

      Lizard people, however, don’t exist.

    • @Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      1581 year ago

      It’s possible it was stress from the litigation. In fact, if you don’t specify whose stress, I’d almost guarantee it.

  • @TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    30
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    He is the reason some people wants the US to be a bit more like Russia. Yeah, no, this wasn’t a suicide, this was to stop the case that he himself had embarked on a long-running legal action on and that he had been in Charleston for legal interviews for. This stops the case in its tracks.

    “John was in the midst of a deposition in his whistleblower retaliation case, which finally was nearing the end,” Knowles and his co-counsel Robert Turkewitz said in a statement to TIME. “He was in very good spirits and really looking forward to putting this phase of his life behind him and moving on. We didn’t see any indication he would take his own life. No one can believe it.”

    - https://time.com/6900123/boeing-whistleblower-john-barnett-found-dead-deposition-safety/

    Please don’t reply if you are just going to spam “BuT sUiCiDe”. If that’s false, he’s just another casualty of Boeing. If that’s true, he’s just another casualty of Boeing.

    Funny how he takes his own life in an hotel car park, and no one hears it. Let me guess, he also happened to buy the gun and get the gun permit the same day … His anxiety never manifested as suicidal tendencies, and if anything, taking action had decreased it.

  • @werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -11 year ago

    How tall was the self inflicting wound fall? There aren’t a lot of tall buildings near Everett.

    Maybe it was 3 bullets to the back? He was probably an engineer. Engineers can figure out how to purposely shoot themselves in the back more than 1 time with the same or multiple guns. Some plywood, rope or string, glue gun, and miscellaneous items, that’s all you need really…and a gun with bullets. Let’s start a project “automated self immolation chair”. I’m going to set-up a weekly meeting with you all until a prototype rev A is complete. We’ll start this morning with a 4 hour DFMEA followed by a three hour brainstorming session. We’ll need a business plan if we want approval for resources. I’ve just discussed the objective with my boss. She said no, and to take the trash out. And wash the dishes. It was an abrupt end of project but we learned valuable lessons. I’ll have a report out before Friday 5pm. We’ll be going out for drinks if you want to discuss details. Ah yes! Another successful project completion!

    • @gorgori@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Completely on point. I am an engineer. If I were to self inflict gunshots, I would 100% design a contraption that would shooot multiple times. Need to make sure.

      Also need to hide this contraption while I am in the dying process. To make sure people know it was self inflicted.

    • @Emerald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      Let’s start a project “automated self immolation chair”

      that’s just called the electric chair, is it not? Just press the button yourself

      • @werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Well, I mean, it doesn’t have to be electric. We need to discuss the IP in this here electrical seating device you mentioned wherein they have incorporated a single button function for electrically terminating life function. There may be room for a continuation design patent where dismemberment, disembowelment and other dis-x-ments can also be actuated via a single throw single contact latching button. With proper denouncing circuits and or algorithms, we can be sure to only de-live once per period. Anvils are single de-living event devices for example.

  • @Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    991 year ago

    So, the guy was expected to appear in court for thw second round of questioning and when he didn’t show up was found dead in his truck in the underground car park of the hotel. Doesn’t sound like someone that wanted to end it. Maybe I’m wrong but I wouldn’t book a room to go to court and then on a whim decide to end it.

    They should investigate the coroner asap.

    • Most people that kill themselves do so on a whim. Its probably not the case, but its not impossible. I’m guessing either the coroner is corrupt, or they have actual evidence it was a suicide. If it was a murder, then I doubt Boeing would do it without assurance it couldn’t be traced back to them. So regardless of what actually happened, the only official story there will ever be is that it was a suicide. That is, unless Boeing is as reckless about murder as they are about building planes.

      • Cosmic Cleric
        link
        fedilink
        15
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Most people that kill themselves do so on a whim.

        [Citation required]

        I would argue that most likely than not there is a trail of depression and/or mental illness that leads up to the actual act being done.

        • Absolutely, I don’t mean there is no warning whatsoever. There is almost always a history of depression, but that history is not always visible to loved ones, let alone the public. I just mean they are likely not specifically planning to commit suicide until soon before they do it, which at least in my experience is true

          • @Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            41 year ago

            Yeah it could emerge apparently at random for unsuspecting familiars, but this guy was about to do something that was important for him, on which he worked for years according to the article. Sounds sus to me.

      • Echo Dot
        link
        fedilink
        151 year ago

        Most people who commit suicide actually plan to do it. There is plenty of warning beforehand.