I’ve also seen US teachers spending hundreds of dollars out of their own pockets to stock classrooms.

I spent a lot of time in European schools and I’ve never heard of teachers having to stock their own classrooms or fundraise for things like playgrounds, etc.

  • TheaoneAndOnly27
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    My partner is a teacher and we spend around $200 a month just on snacks for their classroom (snacks have to be individually packaged, and there’s 36 kids per class, so that’s 72 snacks a day, Because the kids have a morning snack and an afternoon snack.) Even with donors, choose PTA and other groups. We just know that there’s a certain amount of our income each month that’s going to go too supporting her classroom. It sucks but we have accepted it, because by us not doing that the kids are just going to suffer.

    • @GiddyGap@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      I know that you probably get a tax deduction for it, but stories like these are still just crazy to me. These things should be taken care of by the school district, not the individual teachers. Wow.

  • Altima NEO
    link
    fedilink
    English
    161 year ago

    It wasn’t always the case. Back when I was a kid, the school provided most things. Textbooks, crayons, paper, scissors, glue, etc. I had to bring myself, a pencil and eraser, and a notebook.

    Somewhere along the line they figured out they could be pocketing that money instead of spending it on the kids, let the parents deal with the expenditures. Now you’ve got superintendents with quarter of a million dollar salary, over-budgeted construction projects that aren’t always necessary (and they arent allowed to reallocate those funds elsewhere, so they just construct more bullshit), and they still find the time to screw over the teachers (who are making as much as a highly paid retail employee).

  • AFK BRB Chocolate
    link
    fedilink
    English
    501 year ago

    Education is way undervalued. Teacher pay is horrible and the schools don’t have enough funding for the number of students. So years ago they started putting more and more of the obligation on the parents (and, actually, on the teachers) to supply their own materials.

    • @foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      131 year ago

      Schools in well funded states literally need like double what they’re getting, and they need it yesterday.

      Let alone worse funded states. Can’t imagine what public education is like in rural Idaho.

      • @Sylver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        As someone from Central Pennsylvania with only 300 total students from K-12th grade, we are simultaneously drowning and shooting ourselves in the foot with the local R’s we put on school boards

        • Spaz
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          Eh… i wouldn’t use the wording shooting anywhere near the words schools.

  • GladiusB
    link
    fedilink
    61 year ago

    They are over qualified and underpaid. They are also underappreciated with who it matters, those that pay them.

    They need to supply their ideas because they do it because they care. They have my upmost respect. Them and health care professionals work their asses off. At least with healthcare, they have decent paycheck.

  • @Psiczar@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    15
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    In Australia, for a public school student, the school provides a list of pencils, pens, glue etc the child will need for the year. You can choose to buy it from wherever but there are school suppliers that will provide everything in a pack for a fee and deliver it to your door.

    There is no expectation that the teacher would pay for anything out of their pocket.

  • Neato
    link
    fedilink
    English
    211 year ago

    Schools are sabotaged. They underfund the actual school so they can’t afford common supplies like this, or repair their AC or building upkeep, etc. They vastly underpay teachers so there are fewer of them, increasing workload per teacher so there’s more burnout and less effective teaching. They make wedge issues like the book bans, sex ed and anti-trans bills that prevent teachers teaching the obvious reality in order to increase anger at teachers to burn more out. They pass bills that allow people to take their taxes out of schools to move to other schools in richer areas or to keep if they homeschool (to indoctrinate).

    They are the US republicans and the purpose of this is to ensure the most amount of poorer people are uneducated, don’t get a chance to get higher education. Which leads to ensuring fewer have well-paying jobs, and more people live desperately and can’t quit their jobs, move or exercise their right to assembly. This ensures a life-long near-slave caste of workers so billionaires have cheap labor and who are easily manipulated emotionally through fear keeping Republicans in power.

    • @BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -23
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      or to keep if they homeschool (to indoctrinate

      I think you’ve got it mixed up. Public school is indoctrination. Homeschooling allows teachers/parents to teach kids how to think, not just regurgitate facts (and opinions masquerading as facts).

      And I find it ironic that you blame Republicans for the poor public education in the country when California, one of the bluest states, has some of the worst public education in the country.

      It’s not a left vs right thing; it’s a rich vs poor thing.

      Edit: My humblest apologies, oh downvoters, for acknowledging reality. Just because you don’t like a fact doesn’t make it any less true.

      I don’t like it myself; I wish I could just blame it on Republicans and fight back by voting against them, but it isn’t that simple. Rich people can afford private schools, so they don’t care about public education, or they don’t have kids, so they don’t care about public education, and they have the money/power, so they decide the rules.

      Them’s the breaks, I’m afraid.

  • vortic
    link
    fedilink
    301 year ago

    Many people here are talking about under-funding of education in the US. If you look at expenditure per student vs GDP per capita, the US is actually doing fairly well when compared to the rest of the world. Our problems aren’t funding related (though I wouldn’t argue against more funding). Our problems are allocation and priority related.

    See here for data: https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cmd/education-expenditures-by-country

    • phillaholic
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      I wonder if there are some holes in their methodology with regards to how people are paid in the US vs Europe. Like are they factoring in government benefits of teachers and staff that aren’t part of work like they are in the US. Salary and Benefits is a huge part of the cost, as well as land and construction costs.

      • @Anamnesis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Well, healthcare and other benefits aren’t likely to account for the discrepancy, as pretty much all teachers get benefits (with the exception of adjuncts at the university level, who are absolutely fucked).

        • phillaholic
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          My understanding is salaries are higher in the US in part because of the lack of universal healthcare, and other things that end up coming out of people’s pockets when compared to Europe. I did a little digging on the site, and it does look like salary and benefits are up to 80% of the cost.

      • vortic
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        That’s true. They may not be factoring in government benefits. Things like universal health care.

    • The problem is multiplied by the fact that the people who are supposed to figure out how to be efficient with the money are either elected or paid way below market rate. So either way, they don’t have the skills for it.

      • @Cort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        a lot of the rich parents in the area still sent their kids to private school, meaning they’re basically paying for education twice

        Not any more thanks to the Republican pushed school voucher system!

        I think your last sentence touched on the real problem. Schools are funded based on local property taxes. So if you’re in a poor area your schools are poor. It’s like Jim Crow and segregaron but legal

      • vortic
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Wow, how many students are they expecting? I assume they’ll be pulling from a lot of the surrounding area.

        • @PancakeBrock@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          That I really don’t know online it says 97 kids in k-12. It’s in a very rural area and the second phase of construction not in the original bid for the school is housing so when they hire more teachers they have a place to live.

          While I don’t think it’s bad they are getting a new school but going with the op it is kind of crazy when they can do that but my kids teachers ask us to supply the classroom with all kinds of stuff.

  • @FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Because education in the US is a fucking joke, just like everything else in this shithole country.

    Edid: sorry i was in a shitty mood earlier lol

    • @ChillPenguin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      Don’t apologize. This America isn’t the same image our grandparents had of America. What we are seeing now are the deep rooted problems and the true America. Our country is a fucking joke.

  • @BigTrout75@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    121 year ago

    I’m in the US and we just provide a small fee and they provide the supplies. US every state and county is different.

  • In Australia, we get a stationery list at the beginning of each year. So many pens, pencils, a set of coloured pencils, this many lined exercise books, a ruler, erasers, an art book, a set of watercolour paint, etc. in some grades the kids (parents) leave these at home and the kid brings what they require when they run out. Other grades, the teacher takes them all and locks them in a cabinet, gives them out when required.

    Some schools buy 47 (whatever) copies of Romeo and Juliet, Chemistry 1, To kill a mockingbird, Algebra and Geometry, etc, and loan them to the kids at the start of the year. You break it, you buy it. Other schools get you to buy your own books (they tell you which version of which books, and there are commercial bookstores that sell specifically to the school market), but have a school bookshop so you can sell it back at the end of the year, and buy next year’s books secondhand which another family sold. (Or buy new from bookstores mentioned above if there are no secondhand books available at the school bookstore).

    The teachers still have to buy their own equipment: chalk, whiteboard markers, pens and pencils, but the stuff they buy is for their use. Some schools have laptops and smart whiteboards; these are provided by the school.

    (My kids only went to public schools, I don’t know how private schools work).

    • @AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      It really doesn’t sound too different, but what where do you get wipes to clean everything the kids get their greasy hands on, paper towels, tissues for all the colds? How do you help the kids who always forgets his pencils or runs out of paper, or didn’t have enough notebooks.

      A big expense that took the most personal time was classroom decoration, although maybe that’s more for the little kids. The school provides a concrete box with beige walls and desks. It’s a prison. A hopeless, tedious, boring prison. How can you not have places to highlight their work, education assisting devices, and even try to hold their attention and imagination? Are you really teaching g numbers without a number line, vocabulary without making words visible, geography without a map or globe?

      Then the biggest expense my ex had as a teacher was stocking a classroom library. The school won’t pay for that because it’s not a direct part of the curriculum, but how can you not have one? How can you not try to gain the interest of any kid with a chance of reading? How can you not provide a reading opportunity to any kid with spare time or who finishes their work early!

  • @Spacemanspliff@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    Things like the fact that the way the state of Ohio decides the amount of funds allocated to the school districts being found unconstitutional in the 90s but them still using the exact same system to date is probably a large portion of it.

  • @kevincox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    121 year ago

    Basically it is a way to provide unfair education. By forcing the student’s parents to pay for as much as possible you are ensuring that only wealthy neighborhoods get good education.