• ThePowerOfGeek
        link
        fedilink
        English
        151 year ago

        Gen-Xer here, and I agree. I’m impressed with all of the younger generations, from you guys to the Zs. Gen-Alpha is still fairly young, but no reason to believe they won’t also follow suit.

        • @Fluke@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          12
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Other than a significant portion of them getting sucked into bullshit from the likes of Andrew Taint et al.

          Can Z fuck the corpos before the corpo algorithms fuck Alpha?

          BET NOW!

    • @Clubbing4198@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      13
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      the way they alienate gen z as being “conditioned” to like social feedback on ticktok is really denigrating to me. As if every other generation was not conditioned to believe certain social taboos, mores and practices. Same old “young kids don’t know shit” rhetoric. Which viewers at home will just ingest w/o any sort of critical thought process.

    • @ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      Also how quickly they can invent ‘trends’ we should be fearful of simply because some middle-aged reporter watched a couple similar videos online. Now if you’ll excuse me, I have to go eat some tide pods before my scheduled game of knockout.

      • @Avg@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        251 year ago

        Can’t blame them, my generation popularized social networks even after finding out what they were for.

        • @doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -91 year ago

          I can blame them for picking the one that is spyware for the world’s largest hostile dictatorship, you absolute concavebrain moron. Anybody who at this point doesn’t realize what TikToks intended purpose is are willfully ignorant.

            • @doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              -11 year ago

              150 Million Americans are giving the keys to the kingdom to a hostile militaristic dictatorship with the potential to do harm on a scale beyond anything you’ve ever seen

              in return for vines but worse.

              This is one of those issues where “GET MAD” is the correct response.

              • Jazzy Vidalia
                link
                fedilink
                English
                01 year ago

                “Hostile militaristic dictatorship” is just the United States. There’s almost zero difference between the US and China in those regards. The only real difference is that Chinese citizens are actually being lifted out of poverty at a rate not seen at any point in history while the US is continuing to impoverish their citizens. Both of them spy on their citizens and have insanely racist cultures.

                There’s no moral difference between using TikTok and Facebook.

                • @doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  1
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Ji Xinping has no term limit and was unanimously reelected by the single party congress, completely unopposed. China does not select their leadership.

                  The USA criminalizes and punishes misconduct like massive data collection, such as the FCC fining FaceBook 5 Bn USD, but China created and operates an even more invasive and far reaching data collection scheme on their own with TikTok.

                  Face it, loyal dog, China is the same monster it has been for a century, just waiting to add millions more bodies to the pile.

              • @kadotux@lemmings.world
                link
                fedilink
                151 year ago

                “GET MAD” at the proper institution/organizations/companies, not your fellow commenter, who is not even denying what you’re saying. I’m not saying you’re wrong, you’re just being a dick about it.

          • @Miaou@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            -11 year ago

            Believing the USA has better motives is pretty moronic too. Especially if you live in the USA

            • @doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              01 year ago

              Oh is the local Democracy who fines companies like FaceBook billions for doing exactly what TikTok is trying to do

              equivalent in your eyes to

              The Militaristic Expansionist Hostile Dictatorship who created TikTok to do exactly what FaceBook did and rewards them accordingly?

              Thanks for you opinion, dude.

              • @Miaou@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                Again, you need to take a step back. The USA has had much more aggressive and violent international policies than China. It being a democracy (which is itself arguable) does not matter.

                And Snowden showed us that the USA are, again, not better than China in terms of mass surveillance.

                China is a problem, but if you can’t see why the global south sees them as a balancing force rather than a threat, well, again, take a step back.

                • @doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  China is literally annexing it’s neighboring countries and killing multiple different ethnic minorities en masse. Not 60 years ago, not 10 years ago, right now. It’s happening right now.

                  Because they are a Dictatorship. They’re being ruled by an unaccountable class of people.

                  You know why Snowden was such a big deal? Because an arm of the US Government did something illegal by its own laws and he exposed it, leading to massive controversy and political action. Because in the USA the people have protections against that sort of thing.

    • @ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      18
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I see it plenty without the media stoking it. Here on Lemmy, etc.

      It’s the same dumb tribalism as always, often backed up by some real data or trends (that tend to get twisted)

      No, not every “boomer” is spoiled and ruining America, and 75% of the people you call boomers aren’t even boomers. Not every Gen Z is lazy and entitled and scrolling phones all day. Etc.

    • Bakkoda
      link
      fedilink
      321 year ago

      I don’t care what the source is, if there’s a Gen [insert whatever] or Millennials might be to blame for [insert whatever] I’m already at a -10 on the trust meter right out the gate.

      • flicker
        link
        fedilink
        151 year ago

        I didn’t try my first avocado toast until like a year ago and lemme tell ya. Seeing as how eating it somehow went back in time and made me unable to afford a house, I expected it to be a lot more magical.

  • EinatYahav
    link
    fedilink
    1011 year ago

    Influencer or not, however, those who stream videos of themselves being fired from their job risk facing repercussions, such as violating severance agreements, the BBC reported. Job termination videos can also backfire on those who post them if viewers find the post vindictive or unprofessional.

    “Generally speaking, such moves are a double-edged sword. The literature on whistleblowers, a more extreme form of publicly sharing bad practices, shows that people get stigmatized for doing so,” Ben Voyer, an ESCP Business School professor who founded the Gen Z Observatory, told Business Insider in a recent article.

    “Generally, society doesn’t reward people that engage in behaviors that some may see as a betrayal. Pushing such content online is a way to get moral support on the one hand, and a little revenge on the other hand,” he said.

    If you’re confused about who to blame, remember that one side debates on whether they should purchase a mega yacht, or have a more reasonable “support” yacht trailing the main one for their helicopter/staff.

    • @Clent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      381 year ago

      If the majority do it, it can no longer be extreme.

      I’m enjoying the generational divide coming from Gen-Z.

      Previous generations wanting to avoiding “burning bridges” only served corporate interests.

      Workers need stop fearing our corporate overlords. We out number them.

      They’ve manipulated the political process to shattered the social contract and must be held accountable.

      I’m still partial to dragging them into the street since it worked quite well a century but this is a good step towards lighting that powder keg.

      • @rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        -11 year ago

        I’m still partial to dragging them into the street since it worked quite well a century but this is a good step towards lighting that powder keg.

        What exactly worked quite well? The USSR and other “socialist” countries worked well only for those outside their territory, acting as some kind of counterbalance, I’ll admit that.

        What was inside was an even more extreme form of what you call “corporate overlords”, because there wasn’t even an illusion of choice, your path changing employers would be similar to transferring between places in a military, the new employer would see every shitty thing the previous one decided to write about you, and they wouldn’t care what you have to say about that generally.

        • @Clent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          You seem to have taken this comment in some random direction that is pro-capitalism

          I am not going to take the time to go through all the scenarios as to how violent uprisings resulted in the standards or work we have today simply because you can’t understand a common idiom.

          • @rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            -21 year ago

            simply because you can’t understand a common idiom.

            I understand plenty, miss some, and also there are people not worth understanding.

    • @rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      Generally, society doesn’t reward people that engage in behaviors that some may see as a betrayal.

      The gall to speak like that of somebody publicizing the way one of their contacts with equal sides was terminated. Not even “mutual betrayal”, LOL.

      It sucks when people think an organization has more rights than a person. If there’s a contract between two, then they are on the same level.

    • @Got_Bent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      121 year ago

      I was watching Wendover’s billionaire social calendar last night. They have ships whose sole purpose is to transport their yachts from the Mediterranean to the Caribbean so they don’t have to deal with actual transoceanic sailing. Like they literally load the yacht onto the ship like a big cargo rig.

    • @Tamo240@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      471 year ago

      Not even Millennials see action against your employer as ‘betrayal’. Company loyalty is dead, and this professor is out of touch.

    • @Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      131 year ago

      risk facing repercussions, such as violating severance agreements

      oh no, I won’t get dick shit, which is exactly what I was going to get anyway. What a gigantic shame

    • @Grass@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      Yeah most people probably already had the double edged sword in their teeth. Shitty professor is out of touch.

  • @chakan2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -51 year ago

    That’s cool n all, but this chick is now blacklisted from every company with an HR staff bigger than 1 over worked offshore person.

    We can all applaud trying to stick it to the man, but this is going to show up on every background report for the rest of her life.

      • @chakan2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -101 year ago

        I did, for all of a couple seconds, then I remembered what’s on the background checks for some of the employees I’ve seen.

        Cloudflare is a shit company with a shit reputation. A new employee getting shat on in real time is not something to end your career with.

        • Prophet
          link
          fedilink
          English
          91 year ago

          Bro he’s saying that you’re supposed to realize how fucked up it is (and ideally be revolted) that corporations - who don’t give a shit about you or anyone else - team up to prevent bright young adults from having a career and affording to live as payback for exposing their inhumanity/making them look foolish.

          Instead you’re over here like “yeah I lick corporate boot and will gladly accept being stepped on if I get to keep my career.” This girl is a hero for standing up to the likes of cloudflare and we should all aspire to have her courage.

          • @chakan2@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -11 year ago

            Keep aspiring…meanwhile India is chomping at the bit to get this job, they’ll do it for pennies on the dollar, and depending on the worker, they’ll be fucking good at it.

        • @Leg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          91 year ago

          If someone calling out a shit company for being a shit company stops all companies from wanting to hire that person (note: I’m not saying you’re wrong about this), more people should be calling out the fact that every single company in America outright regards themselves as shit companies with no intention of changing that fact. That’s a far-reaching systemic failure that should not go unchecked. I’m sure most of these influencers know damn well what the risks are, and those risks are part of the problem mate.

          • @chakan2@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            That’s kind of my point…they have no idea what the risks are. I don’t really even think this is a shitty corporate thing. When I do a background check and something like this comes up, I’m not hiring this person. What if she publicly humiliates my company, or my team, or one of my teammates.

            You can publicly humiliate me, I’m too old to give a shit.

            This will come up on social background checks for the rest of her life. No one is going to risk a hire like that. Especially for something like sales where sales people are a dime a dozen.

    • @LostWon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      10
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’ve also been concerned about negative outcomes for people based on the videos I’ve heard about and the one I saw posted before, but that’s what makes them so brave. The more they do it and the more such videos are normalized, the less harsh companies can be in retaliation.

      Management being assholes is not as much a generational thing (at least, not as much as it seems) as the nature of what corporations expect of managers. The few amazing managers who somehow remain human while doing their job, who are good mentors, etc., are outliers.

      • @chakan2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I just don’t get what the end game is for this. Let’s say all of gen Z quits tomorrow over this. All of tech will simply move to Brazil, Eastern Europe, and India.

        Since there’s really no social safety net, and we don’t give a fuck about the homeless…they do what exactly?

        For example…the fortune 50 I worked at for a while has enough money to stop selling all their products and still be solvent for about a century at their current spend.

        If they faced a general strike, they can hold out for generations. How long can the average American hold out for?

        This general audience of this site feels like 15-25…they don’t realize the kind of power the big players have.

        • @LostWon@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          This is a step towards humanizing workers, legitimizing their concerns, and building solidarity so people are closer to being on the same page and might maybe agree that something needs to be done. Probably not from this cultural moment, but if enough of them like this happen in succession and get enough attention, then something could change. If you want to discuss parallel economies and mutual aid networks, that’s a whole other discussion.

          • @chakan2@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            You can’t make a stand and ignore the realities of the world around you. Competition for work is a very valid concern if you’re about to strike.

  • @octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3551 year ago

    Gen Z seems to be refusing to swallow the bullshit the rest of us grew up having fed to us. A shame I’ll be close to aging out by the time they get much political power.

    • ki77erb📷
      link
      fedilink
      731 year ago

      I agree with the article. Gen Z are more open to sharing their life with the world. I wouldn’t say early generations just swallowed the bullshit. They just didn’t have a platform to express it to the masses. In the 70s or 80s if you got fired, maybe you reacted the same way, demanding a reason and expressing your frustration. But the only people who witnessed that, were the ones in the room and later on your buddies when you told them the story.

      • @ladicius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        2030 is my guess because roughly half of the kids from the 60s will be mid 60s then and retire or be unable to keep on hustling because of age while all support systems will get into absolute overload.

        It’s seven years until 2030.

        • ☂️-
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          i think you underestimate how bad it can get before they can’t stop a collapse anymore.

          we already have a big homeless population and old people already in dire situations. i think that was the spark that got them so politicized in the first place.

          and the biggest factors will probably be more related to climate change which will take a bit more time to reeeeally fuck with us.

        • @Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          Well either see a brutal market recession as the boomers die off and/or sell off their retirement portfolio to buy more sand for their hourglass, while everyone else is too broke to buy it at the “market value” their financial planner promised them in 1992

          Or capitalists will sweep in and buy it for cheap, exacerbating the housing crisis and continuing to make life unaffordable

          Either way we’re in trouble

          • @ladicius@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            51 year ago

            Joke is: I’m one of these boomers, born in the 1960s 😄

            Classic example of rage math - I’m always furious about the shit and the terror my generation didn’t prevent. We knew and know everything and chose and choose to carry on.

            Assholes all around. I’m dead serious about this.

      • TWeaK
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        And for many of them it will bite them in the ass.

          • TWeaK
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            I was more thinking about the laws against recording people, and particularly publishing those recordings. Along with the recordings being proof of other things, like maybe the person who took snacks on their way out could be accused of theft.

    • IninewCrow
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1641 year ago

      The Bullshit from decades ago was easier to swallow because at least people had a chance to make money and have a decent job while also paying a bit less for things like food, shelter or some luxuries.

      Now people have no choice … they get paid less, they have no security and they have to pay more for food and shelter.

      People were always aware of the bullshit … in the past we could put up with it because we could afford it … now people can’t.

      • Jo Miran
        link
        fedilink
        911 year ago

        Cost benefit analysis. I’m Gen-X and we had to deal with both Silent Gen “company loyalty” and Boomer toxic bullshit, but that was fine because we got a lot out of it and we were able tondo our own shit. In other words, a positive cost benefit analysis. Greed tilted that until it is now not worth it. Its funny how some people love capitalism until the system demands that they adjust. Sorry corpos, if you want a resource, you have to pay fair market value.

    • Ogmios
      link
      fedilink
      22
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Started with Gen X, which is why the baby boomers retiring is creating such a desperate demographic crisis. Nobody wants to buy into such an obviously corrupt system, which has rewarded every consecutive generation with less and less compensation despite the abundantly obvious massive advances in productivity. People are realizing that most of their work is not at all about generating value, but instead is all about occupying their time and energy in an apparent attempt to reduce competition.

    • @rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      591 year ago

      You don’t need to wait for them to get political power, start organizing a union and get that toxic shit out of your workplace now

    • ☂️-
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      thats everyone at their age.

      the difference is they can broadcast it into the world now.

      • @maness300@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        131 year ago

        Nah. When I was a kid, my peers were happy to bend over backwards to work harder for nothing extra.

        Times have changed. That’s what happens as the disparity in wealth continues to grow. More people feel disenfranchised.

        • ☂️-
          link
          fedilink
          -81 year ago

          i was never that dumb to work for free, my friends werent either, sorry to hear your friends were.

      • @octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        Hmm that’s some of it, probably. I don’t think it’s all of it. And even if so, I think that phenomenon can build further momentum.

        • ☂️-
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          id go as far as doubting its at all of it, but AFAICT every recent generation had some good thinking about the problems and were keen on dissenting somehow when they were young.

          even a lot of the boomers (who are seen as very conservative now) had their counterculture thing when they were young.

          i think my biggest point with this is that the kids are generally alright and we can do good by laying off the juvenoia a bit.

          • @octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            i think my biggest point with this is that the kids are generally alright and we can do good by laying off the juvenoia a bit.

            100% agree there.

    • @S_204@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      Have you seen more than the one video floating around? Cuz I’ve only seen the one, could use some more for the spank bank.

  • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
    link
    fedilink
    223
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “I have, like, really given my whole energy and life over the last four months to this job, and to be let go for no reason is like a huge slap in the face from a company that I really wanted to believe in,”

    First mistake was giving your whole life. Second mistake was believing in a company.

    Having survived a layoff like the one they mentioned - people getting random 15 minute meetings, suddenly seeing their accounts decommissioned, etc. - it definitely sucks, and knowing they’ll lay me off like that means I have no reason to have loyalty

    • Ghostalmedia
      link
      fedilink
      English
      571 year ago

      Millennial / Gen X cusp here. I feel like this really started with my generation. Many people no longer look for a job, they look for a job that allows them to make the world a slightly better place. Many of us have had that drilled into our heads from childhood.

      Companies know this, so that’s what they sell when they’re hiring. And when you combine that with the cognitive bias for people wanting to do good through their work, this is the result.

      • peopleproblems
        link
        fedilink
        241 year ago

        Bingo. I mean I accepted pretty early on that A. I wouldn’t enjoy working and B. Someone else is going to make a lot of money off what I do.

        As long as I work for an employer that does something or makes something that can be a net positive, I feel like I’ve found something good.

        -is the lie I keep telling myself

    • r00ty
      link
      fedilink
      711 year ago

      I think most people make this mistake when first entering the workforce though, right? I know I did. Now, I get called pessimistic and cynical. But, I’ve got three decades of experience at various levels of company. With all that experience, I’d prefer to call myself a realist.

      • @RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        641 year ago

        Recruiters aren’t blind to it either, at least for more senior roles. They stopped talking about the “family” that they are, and how much more “fun” it is to work there. They also stopped asking me why I chose this company, and instead ask me why I chose this role, because they know I don’t give a shit about the company. They cut straight to “here is the pay and benefits, we give extra for this that and that”. It should be like that for all levels, from junior to director.

        • r00ty
          link
          fedilink
          241 year ago

          Yes, it should be. But businesses aren’t people, they don’t have a conscience, they don’t care about their employees. They will use any tool they can to underpay someone, and work that same person harder than the rest of the team paid more. Because, they can.

          • @RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            181 year ago

            If there was hope, it must lie in the proles, because only there in those swarming disregarded masses, 85 per cent of the population of Oceania, could the force to destroy the Party ever be generated. The Party could not be overthrown from within. Its enemies, if it had any enemies, had no way of coming together or even of identifying one another. Even if the legendary Brotherhood existed, as just possibly it might, it was inconceivable that its members could ever assemble in larger numbers than twos and threes. Rebellion meant a look in the eyes, an inflexion of the voice, at the most, an occasional whispered word. But the proles, if only they could somehow become conscious of their own strength. would have no need to conspire. They needed only to rise up and shake themselves like a horse shaking off flies. If they chose they could blow the Party to pieces tomorrow morning. Surely sooner or later it must occur to them to do it? And yet-!

    • @pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      30
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I worked at Disney+ in IT for 5 years, they gave me a yearly incentive to stay with them, bonuses, and my 5 years of service pin… and then laid me off a month later.

    • @RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      461 year ago

      This is effectively the only tool we will ever have against them, and we should use it before too much of the labor force is converted and automated, and the remaining employed shut up out of fear.

      A company like Microsoft worth 3 trillion dollars (with a T), who spends billions to acquire another business in a strategic move, should not be allowed to dump the burden on the thousands of people they let go afterwards, just so the books look good.

      They pull billions out of the company in profit, and then claim the company is broke and needs to distribute some losses socially. It’s completely insane that we just allow this to happen in mass. I’m lucky I can choose my companies and I don’t touch the big big corporations so it doesn’t affect me, but we need to do something collectively fast.

      • @Gerudo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        I worked for them in a division that was very customer facing. We got told over and over things we needed to improve the experience weren’t in the budget. I always vaguely waved my hands in the air with a “look at the piles of money” face.

  • @Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1411 year ago

    I hate corpo rats. If GenZ is able to fight the man and not get chewed up and spit out by the system, more power to them.

  • @MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -681 year ago

    I get that no one likes to be fired, especially if they feel that they were let go unfairly, but this seems like it will result in missing out on other job opportunities afterwards. If I was a hiring manager and saw a video like this from a prospective employee I would just throw their application straight in the garbage. If they will post this then who knows what kind of private company details they will post about if I were to hire them

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
      link
      fedilink
      -61 year ago

      Not because they recorded it, though that’s bad, but because they did something idiotic to follow a trend. I don’t need that energy on my team.

    • @elshandra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      211 year ago

      If I was a hiring manager and saw a video like this from a prospective employee I would just throw their application straight in the garbage.

      You probably wouldn’t be a hiring manager very long with that attitude. I don’t get the appeal either, but I don’t do tiktok so. Just from the linked piece, it sounds like it’s becoming increasingly common.

      Quite a leap to posting private company details online. Where are those stored by the way? Office 365? SharePoint? The cloud?..

    • @NegativeInf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      1101 year ago

      I hope that these videos encourage others to leave, get their bag, or not apply to companies that employ shady at best firing policies. If I saw a person standing up for themselves in a place where corporate culture squashes out hope and individuality, I’d be more likely to hire them if my corporate culture actually matched the vibe of the person recording themselves getting fired.

        • @IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          191 year ago

          Firing someone after telling them they need to improve their work performance and giving them a chance to do so?

          The thing is, there’s a difference between being let go as part of a mass layoff and being fired for cause. I’ve seen several of these videos where the employer is telling people they’re being fired for low performance, but they were also firing a large number of other people at the same time, and they hadn’t been employed long enough for “low performance” to be a realistic claim. In some cases, being fired for cause means you don’t get access to unemployment benefits. If they’re actually part of a mass layoff they should be entitled to those benefits. But the company doesn’t want to admit that they regularly lay people off, so instead they list the dismissals as firings for cause.

          • HobbitFoot
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            I feel like getting fired or laid off is like being broken up with, along with the emotions attached. It is bullshit that a company can fire for cause a significant part of their workforce to prevent them from getting a severance or unemployment, but there isn’t a good system to choose who to lay off.

      • Neato
        link
        fedilink
        English
        401 year ago

        Yeah, name and shame companies firing people for nothing or to pad quarterly profits. Not everyone can afford to be choosey in their employer but for those that can I hope stuff like this starves those companies of talent.

    • @PixelProf@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      I get both sides of the argument here. I think we need to have this big reaction because companies have held so much power over employees for so long - I’ll avoid ranting about worker-owned cooperatives here - but the past few years I’ve surprised myself by moving into a bit of a “slippery slope” camp with these things. Not to say it shouldn’t happen, but that we need to be prepared for the follow-up.

      Hopefully related example, in education: There were some really big push backs recently where I am over bad treatment of the students in highschool, all legit. The school board ignored it for a long time, it got bad, they finally took it seriously. Then they overcorrected and stopped believing teachers at all and started jumping straight to firing at almost any complaint. Then students started weaponizing complaints, and now teachers are getting fired for trying to enforce deadlines and for giving low marks because students are complaining about how deadlines, grades, and meeting grading requirements are detrimental to mental health and well-being, and now there are a bunch of these students from this board in my university classes failing hard and filing complaints about courses being too difficult and other things despite them having glowing reviews just a few years prior.

      I guess what I’m getting at: I think it’s fair for someone to choose not to hire people like this because it’s possible that the people willing to stand up and make an important fuss over these things might not know where the line stands between a worthwhile complaint and a non-worthwhile one, and might make a company look badexternally even though it’s doing good internally, just not to someone new to the workforce’s expectations.

      I also think it’s fair to go the opposite direction, because ultimately we need major change in the way companies/everything are structured that lead to these nasty layoffs and poor conditions and if someone does raise issues where there aren’t, hopefully we are prepared enough and in the right enough to take it seriously, but weather it and act in everyone’s best interests.

    • @Death_Equity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      191 year ago

      If I was a hiring manager, I wouldn’t be looking at people’s social media because I only care what their expected compensation, experience, and/or education is. Everything else past their CV is irrelevant unless they need a security clearance or will be working in a sensitive environment.

      • @Brkdncr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        I would. I want to hire someone I could have lunch with, communicate without awkwardness, and be able to appropriately empathize with whatever their situation is.

        That being said, posting their firing would get them bonus points from me. I love people that stand up for themselves, have an opinion, and aren’t afraid to be wrong.

      • Ghostalmedia
        link
        fedilink
        English
        131 year ago

        Good soft skills are also pretty important for a new hire. You often want someone that can be a good communicator, can get lots of different people aligned on an initiative, and can handle conflict in a constructive way.

        A lot of employers peak at social media for clues about this stuff. If someone is a jerk online, they might also be a jerk in the office once they get comfortable.

        • @earlgrey0@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          Absolutely this! I work in tech and it’s shocking how much casual racism and sexism gets tossed around. It is super hard to build a cohesive team when one of the men won’t let a woman coworker speak because he doesn’t like their use of the word “we” when describing their team.

          Dumb tic-tok trends and stupid dance videos are not what employers are looking for.

        • @Death_Equity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -11 year ago

          Sounds like a problem for a manager or supervisor to coach or mentor. If they don’t work out despite their qualifications, they don’t work out despite their qualifications.

    • @fluxion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The problem is half the time they are being laid off, but the company frames it as a firing so they can save money. Getting fired by your previous employer will destroy your job prospects far more directly than some video on social media that only a few percent of recruiters will ever even be aware of. It makes sense to take a unified stand against such a bullshit practice.

      • admiralteal
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        If they are in some way dodging contracted benefits like severance, are in any way defaming the employee, or are trying to prevent unemployment claims, it is going to be illegal to invent cause. People really misunderstand “at will” and think it means that an employer can fire you for any reason at all. It doesn’t. It means they can fire you for no reason at all. They cannot fire you for a protected, illegal, or fake reason, and they still are going to have to honor your contract, make good on the unemployment, et cetera.

        There really isn’t any difference between a “no cause”/at will termination and a layoff. Maybe some fine technical points, but for the layman it’s the same thing.

        And in many states what a previous employer can say to a future employer as part of a reference check is limited – in Cali, for example, any “malicious” statements can get you in a lot of trouble. If you suspect a previous employer might be doing this, talk to a labor lawyer.

        Recording and trying to go viral with these exit interviews is the wrong response if you feel you are being wronged. Sure, record it (if it is legal to do so), but definitely do not upload anything until you have talked to a labor attorney.

        • @fluxion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The interview that set this trend off literally exposed them creating fake metrics to mass-fire employees that they utterly failed at explaining in any coherent way. I think you underestimate how willing companies are to skirt labor laws based on risk/reward analysis of their potential liabilities in the off chance that they get taken to court. Social media levels the playing field and changes that risk/reward calculation.

          • admiralteal
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I didn’t make any statements about whether this employer had behaved illegally, so I am not estimating anything, over or under.

            I am saying that victims should first talk to labor attorneys because there is a lot more you can do. The playing field is flatter than you think. Taking this to battle-by-media should not be the first response or starting point, it should be pretty far towards the end of the war.

      • Ghostalmedia
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        Employers, especially for white collar gigs, often Google the folks they are hiring.

              • @Paradachshund@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                31 year ago

                It’s also considered a red flag to have no online presence, so be careful how far down that road you go if you’re trying to work at companies that would be looking you up to begin with.

            • Alto
              link
              fedilink
              -11 year ago

              Your average HR lackey isn’t going to go full 4chan stalker into you. Doubly so if you also have accounts tied to your name that you very occasionally post very, very mundane things on. They’re not going to go looking deeper when they find your Facebook and see you’re just wishing gamgam a happy birthday

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        221 year ago

        But you can’t choose what people search about you before hiring you.

        On the other hand, I think the people doing this are aware of the risk they’re taking most of the time. They know people will search their names and see what comes up before hiring them.

      • @MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        It’s commonly known now though that most employers will look through anything you’ve posted publicly online these days though. Regardless of what you put on your resume there’s nothing stopping them from doing a Google search for your name. In this case where the post has now garnered attention on news sites an employer wouldn’t even have to go into her social media, since this is just up on multiple news sites forever now

      • conciselyverbose
        link
        fedilink
        101 year ago

        You understand that they can find your social media regardless, right?

        If you have it and publicly post, it’s not private and they can and should consider your public behavior as part of the process of deciding whether to hire you.

          • conciselyverbose
            link
            fedilink
            4
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            This is literally a response to the fact that people putting things on social media is going to make it much harder for them to get a desirable job.

            That’s the entire purpose of the post you were somehow disagreeing with.

    • @NovaPrime@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      If a company is firing you, fuck their “private company details.” You should have zero loyalty or obligation to an entity that’s potentially going to make you go hungry/homeless. Criminal disclosures will be covered by law already, so all you’re doing is slurping up the boot juice and perpetuating the culture of silence that allows companies and capital owners to pit workers against one another

      • @MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        I never said anything about protecting the company that fired you. I have no idea where you got that. My point was that if you do something that proves to potential employers that you’re going to cry on social media every time your unhappy about anything, it means they’re going to be much less likely to hire you

    • @RotaryKeyboard@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -11 year ago

      I’m a hiring manager. I have trouble even imagining the kind of person that would just throw a lead into the trash because of a recording of them getting fired. Who does that? What do you possibly have to gain by doing that? Because you have a lot to lose, especially if that candidate got far enough in the process for you to be researching their background. Nobody gets that far unless they are a very good fit.

  • JoYo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    621 year ago

    “we can often tell within three months or less of a sales hire, even during the holidays, whether they’re going to be successful or not”

    Did not cancel their Christmas vacation, fire them immediately.

    • ShustOne
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      Gen Z is also more compassionate than we were at that age, they know about things like consent and when someone is uncomfortable but not verbally expressing it. They also stabilize in the job market as they age up.

      • @doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        -10
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Means fuck all when they give China blank checks en masse. If I could choose a compassionate dead person or a logical alive one, I would rather Gen Z learned to protect themselves better.

        • ShustOne
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Better be including all ages then because everyone is on that thing.

          • @doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            -4
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Everyone who uses it is a threat to themselves and our society as a whole, that is how big a threat I think it is and I wholeheartedly believe China is willing to make full use of the authority they’ve been given. But it’s mostly the kids.

            And I assume this is self reported data, so it’s probably even more children than just that.

        • Fuck off with that noise. The whole damn world is giving China money you fool. Who do you think makes everything we consume.

          TikTok is no worse than FB just different governments and from what I’ve seen the USA has done more to harm the world than China. And I’m a Brit that has a government that has committed horrors of epic proportions.

          • @doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            -1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Chinese Exports have very recently plunged as a result of embargoes and tariffs due solely to how the rest of the world views them as a threat. FB Meta is paying a 5 Bn USD FCC Fine for how they handle data, more fines in other nations as well, and is currently in lawsuits in several countries as well. TikTok is worse because when they cause serious irreparable harm they don’t get sued or fined in their homeland: they get rewarded for a job well done.

          • @doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            -1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            If it takes them pennies to use an automated fraud system on millions of people then it doesn’t matter how little they can take, but taking a small amount from those who have little is more damaging than a large amount from people with wealth to spare. Median wealth in the USA for under 35 is $39,000 and average is $183,500 .

            Imagine the majority of an entire generation with frozen credit scores unable to obtain vehicles, homes, business loans, and with identities so thoroughly compromised that the thieves have a better chance of verifying themselves than the real person. Tens of Millions of people. The USA would become financially crippled when extreme poverty is already a concern according to UN Special Investigations. It could ruin us for decades.

            Even if YOU have nothing to lose, why would unashamedly wish that harm on so many others? For vines, but worse.

  • Waldowal
    link
    fedilink
    181
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    As a Gen-Xer who’s been beaten into believing you can’t realistically “fight the man”, I fucking love the Gen-Z attitude.

    • @nandeEbisu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      881 year ago

      The housing market is fucked, economic mobility is fucked, the climate is fucked. They’ve already lost to the man, what else do they have to lose?

    • Cosmic Cleric
      link
      fedilink
      531 year ago

      As a Gen-Xer whose been beaten into believing you can’t realistically “fight the man”, I fucking love the Gen-Z attitude.

      Seriously. Give them hell Gen-Z!

  • magnetosphere
    link
    fedilink
    821 year ago

    This is the first “TikTok trend” I’ve seen that doesn’t make me cringe

    • @rtxn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      86
      edit-2
      1 year ago
      1. The recent rise of sea shanties
      2. Detailed instructions for operating abandoned Russian military vehicles
      3. This
      • Objectionist
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        honestly you could’ve left a single comment in opposition against tiktok and left it there but had the audacity to voice against it multiple times.

        sure tiktok is pure evil spyware, you aren’t wrong, but mate just calm down and speak your concerns in a single comment and call it a day.

        more karma too lmao