Hospital says the men were ‘assassinated’. Israel says they belonged to a Hamas ‘terrorist cell’.
    • Collision ResistanceOPEnglish
      16•1 year ago

      Don’t you think it is a little off-brand for the world’s most moral army to summarily execute terrorists in West Bank (which Israel illegally occupies), without due process and also, terrorizing civilians in a hospital.

      • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦English
        -23•1 year ago

        You’re free to ask on c/asklemmy “Is it morally wrong to assassinate three terrorists hiding in a hospital?” and get a debate going on the morality of it. It’s not okay to keep spamming the lie by omission that “IDF killed 3 Palestinians”, obviously insinuating that they killed 3 random civilians, in order to gather more sympathy for the terrorists.

        • Collision ResistanceOPEnglish
          19•1 year ago

          Do you know West Bank is not Gaza?

          Do you justify the military occupation of West Bank?

          Do you think that if Hamas militants somehow enter US, then Israel can send its military into US to execute them on US soil?

          • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦English
            -21•1 year ago

            You’re beating around the bush here. Why is it so hard for you to include the excerpt? Remember, the rules in this community allow you to do that. Why is it hard for you to write “IDF killed 3 Hamas and Islamic Jihad terrorists” instead of “IDF killed 3 Palestinians” when you refer to this incident?

                  • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦English
                    -19•1 year ago

                    Don’t complaint here

                    Isn’t that what you all did when I merely quoted the AlJazeera article to break your false implied narrative that the IDF killed 3 random civilians? Leaving important details out is misinformation. I added an important excerpt from the same article you linked to and you suddenly got “how dare you say they are terrorists”.

      • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦English
        -25•1 year ago

        Why is it “trying to defend the indefensible” when manipulation and lying by omission get called out as people here keep spamming “look the IDF killed 3 Palestinians” when it’s actually 3 terrorists (one affiliated with Hamas, two with Islamic Jihad) that got killed?

        You’re free to argue about the morality of assassinating three terrorists in a hospital. But it’s scummy to leave out the affiliation to try to mislead and gather more sympathy for the terrorists that got assassinated.

        • muse
          15•1 year ago

          It’s maddening to watch people like yourself jump over themselves to shove words in other’s mouths. Never defended, not even by omission, Hamas terrorists.

          It’s like me saying “wow you support these 3 war criminals? You must also support the IDF gunning down civillians waving white flags and specifically targeting journalists to the point that more journalists have died by Israel’s hands than all the combined deaths of journalists during WW2.”

          See how that also makes you look like a piece of shit without you even opening your mouth?

          I’m not on Hamas’s side.

          I’m also not on Israel’s side. I’m just here to watch, helplessly, as this multi generational conflict keeps going, and more people die as the genocide ramps up.

          I’m also here to watch people like you twist themselves in knots to keep pointing out the terrorists to ignore the genocide happening, and pretending that anyone pointing to genocides enjoys israeli children getting bombed.

          In summary: be better. I get that you’ve picked sides in your morally upright conflict. But there is no good side. And just because someone pointed out that “your side” committed a war crime isn’t absolving the other guys’ war crimes.

          Two things can be true sweetie. I know thats a difficult concept for someone wanting to paint the world black and white, while ignoring all the red.