• @zephyreks@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      02 years ago

      To avoid any potential data collection? The US didn’t know what the balloon’s capabilities or purpose were until they shot it down. Until then, treat everything as a threat. It’s SOP.

          • USNewsJunkie
            link
            fedilink
            -12 years ago

            @zephyreks I’ve already read it. The countermeasures the US took certainly contributed to the lack of data collection.

            • @zephyreks@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              02 years ago

              Yes, and what exactly do you think that means?

              Also, props to Lemmy for handling this discussion, because the latency is way less than Reddit.

              • USNewsJunkie
                link
                fedilink
                -12 years ago

                @zephyreks That means it wasn’t able to collect data in part because of the countermeasures that contributed to preventing it from collecting data. If that was not the case, why wouldn’t the BG have just said, “no it wouldn’t have mattered because it wasn’t trying to collect data.”?

                • @zephyreks@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  02 years ago

                  Because they needed to justify the hassle and spending they spent trying to prevent it from collecting? Do you think the US military budget grows on trees?

                  • USNewsJunkie
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -12 years ago

                    @zephyreks lol I can’t imagine the mental gymnastics you have to jump through to arrive at your worldview. For you to think that in that moment, while being questioned by a reporter about a Chinese balloon and the collection of data that his immediate thought was I need to justify the budget… It’s just astounding.