• digdug
        4•2 years ago

        This is the only reason I haven’t pushed my team to switch. I’m worried too many of them will be OP.

    • @PoopMonster@lemmy.world
      41•2 years ago

      Just as irritating as seeing people use linters only to have a lot of files with @ts-ignore all over the place… Like why even bother?

    • fusio
      11•2 years ago

      using any is actually much worse than using TS, because you’re basically telling the compiler “don’t help me here”… at least with JS the IDE is gonna help you… :/

    • @xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      3•2 years ago

      I don’t follow, stamping every function with : any lets you merge the branch and deploy it… trying to properly type everything extends the initial migration time likely to a level where management just says no.

      • @folkrav@lemmy.world
        7•2 years ago

        Use a combination of allowJs and ts-ignore, do progressive enhancement, and convert your codebase file by file. Adding any everywhere literally turns off type checking altogether codebase wide, including type inference. It also means a huge PR that’s both just noise that needs to be fixed later, and messes with your git history (good luck getting anything useful out of blame or bisect now).

        Just getting a green build doesn’t mean things are okay. You’re worse off than before doing that.

        • @xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          4•2 years ago

          I disagree that you’re worse off (the core of my comment was that even a shitty migration encourages better practices)… but I wasn’t super familiar with TS hinting - using ts-ignore would be preferable.

          Personally, I mostly work in PHP and we use a similar system. Strict typing is default off so we’ve slowly propagated declare(strict_types=1); to enable compile and runtime checking on a per file basis.