@psychothumbs@lemmy.world to

News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 years ago

Blue checks aren’t protecting sex workers from X’s porn crackdown

190

Blue checks aren’t protecting sex workers from X’s porn crackdown

@psychothumbs@lemmy.world to

News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 years ago

Blue checks aren't protecting sex workers from X's porn crackdown | TechCrunch

When X (formerly Twitter) launched paid subscription verification, Mistress Rouge, a professional dominatrix, hoped that it would help her advertise to Sex workers bought Twitter Blue in hopes that it would protect them from being shadowbanned and deplatformed. Under X's new nudity policy, they're being censored anyway.

You must log in or register to comment.

HotTopNewOld

Chat

@archiotterpup@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
46•2 years ago
Yes. They’re not developers for a reason.
- Midnight Wolf
  link
  fedilink
  English
  12•2 years ago
  Oh yeah, give it to me, ohh, ohhhh, OHHH YEAH
  
  Wait why the hell does it still say ‘critical error at line 5176’ HOW THE FUCK DO YOU DO THIS SHIT?! It was so much easier when I just boned people.
  - @SheeEttin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5•2 years ago
    Semicolon.
- @Sharkwellington@lemmy.one
  link
  fedilink
  22•2 years ago
  They prefer to be fucked over at work in a different way.

News@lemmy.world

!news@lemmy.world

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !news@lemmy.world

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

722 users / day
2.34K users / week
5.09K users / month
11.7K users / 6 months
1 subscriber
27.7K Posts
683K Comments
Modlog