- cross-posted to:
- worldnews@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- worldnews@lemmy.ml
You must log in or register to comment.
It’s not the safest by any margin: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_power_accidents_by_country
It’s not the most reliable: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_in_France#Crisis_since_late_2021
It’s not the least polluting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioactive_waste
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioactive_waste_dumping_by_'Ndrangheta
There is enough material to last us for the foreseeable future while we develop other sources to be able to rely on 100% of the time.
There are enough alternatives to ditch nuclear already and rely on better sources
It’s not the safest by any margin: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_power_accident s_by_country
From that link…
Relatively few accidents have involved fatalities, with roughly 74 casualties being attributed to accidents and half of these were those involved in the Chernobyl nuclear disaster.[6]
Compare that to estimated 7 million killed every year by pollution from burning fossil fuels.
How many people died in Somalia due to nuclear waste?
None confirmed from any of the reports I could find, but feel free to post credible evidence otherwise.
None confirmed and yet the waste is there dumped in the wild, do the math
You really trust UNSCEAR ? 😆
#Nuclear is an expensive, uninsurable, unviable tech kept afloat by usually authoritarian government subsidies that produced waste that will be around for thousands of years.
Nuclear fission is a dead end technology.
Wind, Solar and Battery tech will be in place in a fraction of the time and for less cost.
