Cool made up things! Republicans are trying to ban you from saying gay people exist now? Source? Websites are being censored? Source?
Did you miss when Herr trump banned all those DEI websites? Like are you really that ignorant of what is going on?
Banned all those DEI websites? You mean removed policies from their government websites that no longer existed?
If the government end a government program, it’s not “censorship” to remove said program from government websites lol.
If the government end a government program, it’s not “censorship” to remove said program from government websites lol.
It is when it’s targeted specifically to non straight white men. Lol you need to try harder at trolling
That’s not “censorship”. Nothing is being “censored”. The goverment ended all DEI programs in their ranks, so they removed all DEI programs from their websites. Do you think they should keep advertising DEI programs that no longer exist?
Lol you need to try harder at trolling
What is it with Lemmy and accusing everyone who dares to have an opposing view of “trolling”? What exactly in my posts says “trolling”?
That’s not “censorship”. Nothing is being “censored”. The goverment ended all DEI programs in their ranks, so they removed all DEI programs from their websites. Do you think they should keep advertising DEI programs that no longer exist?
It literally is when it’s targeting anyone but white men.
What is it with Lemmy and accusing everyone who dares to have an opposing view of “trolling”? What exactly in my posts says “trolling”?
Oh, you actually believe this? Ouch, that’s so much worse, sorry about that! I apologize. I’m against views that go against respecting others and I’m also against people who defend fascists, that is something I’m proud of.
It literally is when it’s targeting anyone but white men.
Removing outdated information from a website is censorship because it “targets” anyone but white men? What? The DEI programs no longer exist, so the government removed the information about the DEI programs. That makes sense no matter how you feel about the DEI programs ending. If it doesn’t exist, you remove the info about it.
Are you trying to argue that ending DEI programs is “censorship”? That’s an entirely different argument, and “censorship” isn’t even remotely the right word for it.
Oh, you actually believe this?
Believe that you’re just saying I’m “trolling” because you disagree with me? Yes, I believe that because that’s what you’re doing. You haven’t shown any evidence of me “trolling” because I’m not. We’re having a discussion, or at least I’m trying to. It seems to me like you’re trying to get my opinion and views censored by calling them “trolling”, and I’m assuming you’re also reporting my comments as such too right?
The DEI programs no longer exist, so the government removed the information about the DEI programs. That makes sense no matter how you feel about the DEI programs ending. If it doesn’t exist, you remove the info about it.
why?
You haven’t shown any evidence of me “trolling” because I’m not.
I know, I apologized, this is so much more sad that you’re serious
It seems to me like you’re trying to get my opinion and views censored by calling them “trolling”, and I’m assuming you’re also reporting my comments as such too right?
you don’t know what censure is, and no I’m not reporting you.
why?
Why…what? Why would they remove the information about programs that no longer exist? Because they no longer exist. The information is no longer relevant, and leaving it up would only cause confusion.
you don’t know what censure is, and no I’m not reporting you.
CenSURE and cenSOR are very different things. Are you claming that the removal of the DEI stuff from the government websites is censuring or censoring?
I assume you are a troll since this isn’t a secret and has been in countless news articles, but here you go. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-LGBTQ_curriculum_laws_in_the_United_States
Wikipedia is not a source.
No one is trying to deny gay people are a thing.
The sources in Wikipedia are
So provide those sources along with what part of them you’re actually talking about.
Which laws specifically?
You see them. They were provided to you.
I don’t see them, because I don’t go to wikipedia links and look for a needle in a haystack to support your argument.
You provide the links to the laws that you think support your argument.
my argument? Lol no. Also it’s not a needle in a hay stack, everything is neatly listed at the bottom haha.
What Tool_Shed said. Wikipedia isn’t a source, it’s a reference. Links to the sources are included in the Wikipedia page. If you are refusing to look at the links then you are simply a troll. You don’t care to read the truth. You are more interested in spreading MAGA bullshit. There are 58 sources at the bottom of the page, many of which include links to state legislature websites and specific laws you can read yourself. You aren’t a freedom advocate you are a troll and not a very bright one.
You’re arguing that I should go and find my own examples of something that I am arguing isn’t happening, rather than the person making the argument that it is providing actual examples. That’s not how conversations and arguments work.
The original person, or yourself, can provide evidence to back up the original claim. It’s not my job to go and guess what exact part of what link you’re talking about.
my argument?
You as in the person who is making the argument.
