This story includes discussion of suicide. If you or someone you know needs help, the national suicide and crisis lifeline in Australia is available by calling 13 11 14. In the U.S., it is available by calling or texting 988. There is also an online chat at 988lifeline.org
Probably yes and this is how all these bullshit conspiracies start on the right in particular. Don’t be part of the problem.
Until we see evidence of foul play we have no reason to believe there was foul play.
Plus if you want to start speculating, here’s something to consider: how much more damage could she possibly do? She already did it. It’s out there. This simply draws more attention back to something that people haven’t talked about for years in national media. He already weathered the crisis.
What we should really be talking about is what likely caused her to take her life, because that’s the kind of stuff that has a chilling effect on people speaking out against powerful people.
What is the date on that Tweet/post?
Uncropped tweet, it’s Dec 2019
Five and a half years ago. People can change a hell of a lot in that amount of time. I know I did.
So 5.5 years ago.
And as we know, no one who has ever committed suicide has said “I won’t commit suicide” before.
The oldest tweet I see from that account is on Oct 5, 2020. Is there any primary source for this tweet?I found a primary source: https://x.com/VRSVirginia/status/1204620018035462144
I can’t see what you sent it just says “failed to load media“ on Voyager
Virginia Giuffre & @VRSVirginia
I am making it publicy known that in no way, shape or form am I sucidal. I have made this known to my therapist and GP- If something happens to me- in the sake of my family do not let this go away and help me to protect them. Too many evil people want to see me quiteted 🦋
December 2019. Interesting they left the date and link out.
…
Are you kidding?
Virginia Giuffre’s WHOLE LIFE had been nothing but foul play!
If you look up Foul Play in the dictionary her picture as a kid should come up.
Benefit of the doubt exists until violated, we are infinitely past that barrier, that’s like suggesting “I wonder if 9/11 wasn’t an accident” after OBL took credit for it.
You should check out this very short piece by the legendary Errol Morris. It explains my position better than I ever could. It is well worth the watch, you should watch it from start to finish. Its not even 6min
My issue is your position denies the overwhelming presence and patterns of malfeasance shown thus far in this case.
If I found a dead body in the cell of a convicted serial killer, it would not be an unreasonable supposition to draw that the serial killer was involved.
Did you watch the video?
Also last I checked he was not convicted of a crime. I think he’s probably guilty, but this “overwhelming evidence“ and “pattern” portrait you’re painting is pretty cracked. In fact the video does a very good job of talking about your “patterns.”
Again, you should watch it. I’m being very insistent for a reason
You have problems dude.
Firstly: https://apnews.com/article/jeffrey-epstein-florida-e2a4431f7319afd037023d9a586aa291
He plead guilty to sex trafficking, so we’re past evidence, he wasn’t convicted of a crime because he admitted it openly.
Secondly, I watched the short, I get it, changes very little, especially given the special treatment by prosecutors.
Telling people that they have problems is NOT nice. It’s the only rule here at Beehaw in which you have broken. Take a 7 day vacation.
Ok surely you know I meant Andrew and not Epstein. This is flagrant misrepresentation and you know it. There isn’t a person in the world who doesn’t know what happened to Epstein and I find your attempt to make me sound completely out of the loop like that insulting to the point that it makes me not want to continue having this conversation. You know what you’re doing. Don’t pull bullshit moves to cover your lack of a coherent argument.
If you watched it then you should understand that just because you can draw lines between things doesn’t mean the lines are correct. Human beings are very creative people. We’re very good at coming up with explanations. The veracity of those explanations however is very inconsistent
YOU are the only person bringing Andrew in, I never did that. Re-read using proper comprehension.
Again, you have problems.
…have you forgotten what this post was even about? Reread the headline. This is literally about the Prince Andrew accusation. I get some of you don’t read articles before commenting, but this is ridiculous.
You should watch this very short piece by the legendary Errol Morris. It explains my position better than I ever could. It is well worth the watch, you should watch it from start to finish
