Summary

The Trump Store released $50 “Trump 2028” hats Thursday, sparking backlash online as Trump has repeatedly hinted at running for a third term.

“I have had more people ask me to have a third term,” Trump said on March 31, claiming the 2020 election was “totally rigged.”

Steve Bannon said he’s exploring “five or six different alternatives” to enable a third run.

Critics on social media called it “insane” and a sign of “fascist” ambitions. Though barred by the 22nd Amendment, Trump could run again if it were overturned by Congress and the states. However, it would require a two-thirds vote of Congress and three-fourths vote of the states.

  • rhabarba
    link
    fedilink
    -972 days ago

    Critics on social media called it “insane” and a sign of “fascist” ambitions.

    I don’t believe that ‘being able to be elected by voters one more time’ is even close to being the same as a ‘fascist dictatorship’.

    • Libra00
      link
      fedilink
      English
      602 days ago

      Except it’s not being able to be elected, because he’s served two terms and that limitation isn’t just a law, it’s an amendment. I don’t care how much of congress they control, changing it will require a new amendment and that’s just exceedingly unlikely to happen, much less happen before the end of his current term. So if he can’t change the rules, attempting to stay in power anyway is absolutely fascist dictatorship material.

        • Libra00
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 days ago

          And that’s also fascist. If we’re assembling a list of the fashy shit Trump has done one by one we might be here a while.

        • @fishos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          192 days ago

          Simple. If done by a single person or small group that is not representative of the whole, it’s facism. If done with the blessing of the people, it’s not.

          If trump passed an amendment changing that, and did so by acquiring the proper amount of votes in all areas, that would be fine.

          If he does it by saying “I can because I say so”, that’s facism.

          I know you’re just being a troll or intentionally ignorant, but that’s the answer. You’re intentionally stripping ALL THE NUANCE out and trying to act naive.

          • @iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            132 days ago

            To be fair, that just makes it authoritarian, not fascist. It’s all the other stuff he does combined with that which makes it fascist.

            • @fishos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              52 days ago

              Fair point. I was focusing more on the “with or without the people’s blessing” aspect.

                • @fishos@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  7
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  I don’t believe that ‘being able to be elected by voters one more time’ is even close to being the same as a ‘fascist dictatorship’.

                  Where was the question? I only see misinformed assumptions and straight falsehoods.

                  I refer you to my original request about stfu-ing

      • @Ferrous@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -302 days ago

        The 22nd amendment does not prohibit Trump from serving a third term. It prohibits Trump from being elected a third time. Weak ass document.

        • @chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          202 days ago

          Your phrasing could use some help, but you’re correct that there is a flaw in the text of the amendment and the Presidenial Succession rules that may allow for shenanigans.

          But the clear intent is to prevent 3rd terms, and any attempt to circumvent the amendment is definitely dictator shit.

          • @Ferrous@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 days ago

            But the clear intent is to…

            And there’s the rub. You have an extremely weak and vague Constitution that everyone has so far just agreed to follow with a wink wink, nod nod. Once the first demagogue showed up, that shit went out the window.

          • @Ferrous@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            02 days ago

            What are you talking about? The amendment makes no mention of VP or succession.

            No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of President more than once. But this Article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this Article was proposed by Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this Article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.

            This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years from the date of its submission to the States by the Congress.

            • @ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              52 days ago

              The amendment doesn’t have to because VP already has the same requirements as president in the main body of the Constitution.

              Amendments are only the change being made, not reiterating what already existed. VP used to just be the second place in the presidential election.

              • @Ferrous@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                117 hours ago

                VP already has the same requirements as president in the main body of the Constitution.

                Show me how this keeps Trump from being allowed to succeed into POTUS. Yall are backpedalling because you’ve never actually read the Constitution.

                The 22nd amendment prohibits Trump from doing this

                No it doesn’t

                well sure, but the “main body” (the articles…) does

        • @ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          32 days ago

          No, it definitely does prevent him. You can do not serve UP TO half of someone else’s term BEFORE you serve your own two. It’s a total of 10 years, and you cannot be VP if you’re ineligible for President.

          • @chiliedogg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            5
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Actually, they’re right. The 22nd amendment prevents someone from being elected into office after serving 2 terms or 2 terms and half of someone else’s.

            It’s technically silent on being elevated to the Presidency by other means than an election after serving 2 terms.

            The real crazy bit is that the Speaker of the House is 3rd in line, and technically doesn’t have to be a member of Congress. So ttechivally the GOP could name Trump Speaker and get rid of POTUS and Veep (through resignation or impeachment/conviction) and have Trump be President again.

        • Libra00
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 days ago

          That definitely makes it not fascism right? :P

          • @Ferrous@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Biggest evidence of fascism I see is a constitution which explicitly enshrines the right to enslave people.

            • Libra00
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 day ago

              Yep, that’s also pretty fashy, but’s by no means the only fascist issue in this country.

    • @Lumidaub@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      -5
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Edit: … I’m on your side, people, read to the end of this novel of a post.


      When Angie entered her 16th year of being German chancellor, USians yelled about dictatorship too. I had several discussions about how simply remaining in power for a long time does not mean one is a dictator, as long as free and equal elections happen. I may not have agreed with CDU voters (ever), I certainly have never voted for them, but tough.

      Circumstances in this case however do suggest that he’s trying to overthrow their entire system and this third term stuff is just an overt symptom of a disregard for their constitution.