• @LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 day ago

      I mean… Electronics and the Internet are also following the laws of physics. But I get what you mean, levers should be the only activation, and gravity should be the only requirement.

      That being said, electronics in our devices do tend to reduce the amount of water and power that appliances use. Dumb devices are extremely inefficient, even though there are fewer points of failure.

      It sucks that a 1950’s fridge can still function just fine today, but it also is a bigger strain on the power grid, and a leak in the refrigerant would destroy the ozone.

      • @sugarfoot00@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        > That being said, electronics in our devices do tend to reduce the amount of water and power that appliances use. Dumb devices are extremely inefficient, even though there are fewer points of failure.

        I fail to see how electronics in these (unpowered) devices in any way reduce the amount of power that they use.

        • @1D10@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          51 day ago

          In theory you could have a system that monitors input and then uses a precise amount of water to vacate the bowl.

        • I think that was just a general statement regarding old devices, since they brought up a 1950s refrigerator as an example of a powered “dumb” device

        • Natanael
          link
          fedilink
          11 day ago

          Sprinklers and all kinds of stuff are more efficient with sensors and electronic regulators

      • Lexi Sneptaur
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 day ago

        Yeah I think the meaning of the above comment boils down to “If it doesn’t have a simple fallback, it can’t be trusted”.

    • @ace_of_based@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 day ago

      You’re already @ the mf toilet too, or the sink. what is even the purported purpose of remotely activating something you have to stand there to use?

    • @Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I can see some purpose in having a ‘smart’ toilet for monitoring health. Your pee and poo can have some value in seeing if there anything that needs to be dealt with medically. But even that is difficult to do. For one thing, it must still function ad a toilet first before anything. Meaning it uses the simple mechanical flushing and refilling and stopping when it is sufficiently full.

      However for this the analysis and storage of data must be 100% at the user’s control. If they want it gone. It is gone. Irrecoverable. Any update must be done via USB or other connection. No wifi or internet.

      And even then the analysis can be off for obvious reasons. People need to scrub their toilets and some keep it clean by having one of those pucks in the tank that sanitize the water. All of these can interfere with any results out of a medical setting.

      • Lv_InSaNe_vL
        link
        fedilink
        219 hours ago

        Yeah but if they let users control the data then how are they supposed to sell it to insurance companies to boost their value to VCs???