Collection of potential security issues in Jellyfin This is a non exhaustive list of potential security issues found in Jellyfin. Some of these might cause controversy. Some of these are design fla…
Effort or no, if an attacker can reasonably bypass it, it’s not secure. That’s why software gets security patches all the time, why encryption/hashing algorithms can fall out of favor, and why quantum computing can be pretty fucking scary.
No system is secure.
#confidentlyincorrect
The votes are not on your side
I didn’t say it’s secure, I just said it’s security.
You’re hiding behind literal definitions to avoid addressing the functional issue/implications.
This is like when somebody says “no one believes that“ and the other person finds a tweet by one person that believes the thing. The claim isn’t that literally not one person does, it’s that it’s so unusual you may as well act as if nobody does.
Surely you understand how people talk and basic vernacular?
Surely you understand how a stupid response to a silly statement like it is one of the sayings of all time can be appropriate in humorous situations, right?
I understand that you did not find it funny, but I hope that you can understand that it was my intention to be funny, and therefore a serious response is disproportionate.
I thought you were being serious as well. I’ve dealt with enough people who would genuinely make that argument so I assume nothing.
The humorous intent was not obvious.
Kinda was. Sry.
oh well if you’re saying so then it must be true.
No, in this case it’s true independent of my opinion or perspective.
I’d love to see your homework on that. Must be really interesting data points here. I’d love the ability to prove my opinions and ramblings on the Internet are “objectively true.”
All this BS aside I was clearly wrong because they said so. It was a mistake. You’re going to survive.
It definitely was lol
👍
When “hundredths fractions of security” fails to get a laugh, I know I’m in the wrong group of people.
How about 0.001 security?
