• Victor
      link
      fedilink
      English
      99 days ago

      How so? The first century surely started with year 0, the first year. Just like a person is zero years old during its first year. And years 0-99 make up the first century. Then the second century starts at 100-199, and so on. 🤷‍♂️

            • Victor
              link
              fedilink
              English
              16 days ago

              Looked it up now, you’re correct.

              Although there are instances of year zero, like with astronomical years.

          • falseprophet
            link
            fedilink
            59 days ago

            In many Asian countries they do if I am not mistaken but it irrelevant to when the millennium starts anyway

            • Victor
              link
              fedilink
              English
              09 days ago

              In many Asian countries they do if I am not mistaken

              Huh, that’s really interesting ☺️ kinda cute ngl

        • @i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          49 days ago

          There is no year 1 in our current calendar system either. The Gregorian Calendar begins in 1582. The Julian Calendar includes year 1, but changed in year 8, so 0001-01-01 is a slightly different day in the Gregorian Calendar, the Julian Calendar, and the old Julian Calendar. 2000 years after Julian Calendar 0001-01-01 is late December 2000.

          This has less meaning in China because China used its own calendar until 1911. People living in China 2000 years before 2001-01-01 would not have called it year 1.

    • Victor
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 days ago

      It’s complicated.

      There’s a “strict” way and then there’s a “common perception and practice” way. You’re thinking of the strict way.

      But yeah, sure. I guess it’s due to the fact that we don’t have a year zero, really, which is counterintuitive for us in the modern era, I suppose. At least for me.