doesn’t it follow that AI-generated CSAM can only be generated if the AI has been trained on CSAM?
This article even explicitely says as much.
My question is: why aren’t OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, Anthropic… sued for possession of CSAM? It’s clearly in their training datasets.
You must log in or register to comment.
it’s by definition not CSAM if it’s AI generated
Tell that to the judge. People caught with machine-made imagery go to the slammer just as much as those caught with the real McCoy.
It’s not legal advice I’m giving here.
Have there been cases like that already?
