Summary

President Joe Biden pardoned his son Hunter Biden, reversing his prior stance against using executive clemency.

The pardon covers Hunter’s federal gun conviction and tax evasion guilty plea, sparking political controversy.

Biden cited political attacks and a “miscarriage of justice” as reasons for his decision, emphasizing his son’s recovery from addiction and the targeting of his family.

Critics argue the move undermines the judicial process, while supporters view it as within Biden’s constitutional powers.

This decision shields Hunter from potential prison time as Biden nears the end of his presidency.

  • @Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    655 months ago

    I’m not happy about this. Not one bit. Just like how I wouldn’t have been happy to hear about Trump pardoning one of his own kids for breaking the law. As a matter of fact, I’m furious reading some of the comments in this thread.

    It shocks me to see people defending this. We fought against the Republicans to prevent misuse of executive powers exactly like this. How the fuck can you sit there and rationalize this while saying it’s wrong for Trump to pardon the Jan 6th insurrectionists? or himself for that matter?

    This is a black stain on Biden’s presidential legacy. It’s shit like this that puts wind in the sails of all the crazy Republican conspiracy theorists out there. Now, every single motherfucker who ranted and raved about the “Biden Crime Family” since 2020 was just proven right, just like how all the people who said that Trump’s convictions were politically motivated were proven right when Jack Smith dropped the charges. It makes us look like fucking morons and hypocrites.

    No, before anyone says it, it is not smart to stoop to their level when basically the only messaging we sent out during the entire 2024 campaign was that we were the morally superior choice. That someone who doesn’t respect the rule of law has no business being president. Now, we don’t even have that to lean on.

    • @DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15 months ago

      We fought against the Republicans to prevent misuse of executive powers exactly like this.

      And we lost.

      Americans want corruption. We voted explicitly for it.

      No point in taking the high road or honoring decorum anymore. It doesn’t work to win elections in America.

      • @Furbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        55 months ago

        I don’t want to live in an America where the government is run by people who are in a race to the bottom. I won’t be complicit in the corruption. It’s time to call a stone a stone.

        • @DarkFuture@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          25 months ago

          I don’t want to live in an America where the government is run by people who are in a race to the bottom.

          You already do.

          I won’t be complicit in the corruption.

          Have fun changing it. The majority of Americans just disagreed with you and voted for blatant corruption.

    • @theparadox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      135 months ago

      No, before anyone says it, it is not smart to stoop to their level

      While it’s a bit disappointing, I understand that one perspective is that it is a defensive move. I don’t think it is unreasonable to assume that Trump is going to abuse his power and weaponize the Justice Dept to extract everything he can, politically, from the resulting show.

      I don’t know whether or not Biden would have done the exact same thing if it was a more reasonable Republican administration coming in. That would be far more telling. It might have been that Biden was making a show of it with the assumption that he’d be overseeing and influencing it all as president and if that weren’t the case he’d be abusing his authority to spare his son.

      Yes, it’s frustrating because of the message it send but frankly, I don’t think it’ll cause much trouble. Everyone who’d see it as an admission of the guilt of the “Biden crime family” wasn’t going to change their mind, even if Hunter was publicly drawn and quartered by the Biden administration. Those folks would immediately move the goal post - “Yeah, whatever, but what about…” or just insist Hunter’s death was fake and it was all sham.

    • @candybrie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -25 months ago

      when basically the only messaging we sent out during the entire 2024 campaign was that we were the morally superior choice. That someone who doesn’t respect the rule of law has no business being president.

      And how exactly did that work out? I don’t think moral superiority is at all a helpful thing in politics.

      • nifty
        link
        fedilink
        55 months ago

        Moral superiority is an important cultural and ideological component, it’s something to strive for. But if your political opponents keep bending rules to their favor, being civil seems like a complete waste of time. I agree with the other comments pointing out that this isn’t a win for voters at all.

        • @candybrie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -2
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          It isn’t a win. But it isn’t a loss either. It just doesn’t matter.

          Maybe it’s a step towards losing that holier than thou attitude and actually getting things done.

    • nifty
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I get where you’re coming from, but the political opposition in America to democrats is now literally Nazis and white supremacists. Bidens action isn’t a win for voters in any sense, that’s the only objectionable part tbh.

      • tb_
        link
        fedilink
        45 months ago

        Id argue that when the government is spending millions to investigate a guy who isn’t even part of the government, it’s a political prosecution

        I may not like it, but also kinda fair.

      • @Furbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        -25 months ago

        I don’t really care. The law is the law. The investigations were quite clearly politically motivated, trying to get to Joe by going after Hunter, but the trial was nothing but fair and the judiciary did not make a mistake in the trial or the sentencing. You cannot claim to be a supporter of the rule of law only when it’s convenient for you. This pardon undermines just about every bit of credibility the Democratic party had left. It’s not Biden breaking the rules or using his power for the good of the nation or the people, it’s a selfish abuse for the sake of keeping his son from being held accountable for the things he actually did.

        I would not be surprised if Joe Biden supported some of the very same legislation that would have put his son behind bars back when he was still a senator. Dude was well known for being a “tough on crime” type of politician.

        • @HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          45 months ago

          Have you ever smoked a joint? Have you been to a gun range? If so, you committed practically the same felony hunter did.

          Literally fuck off. This whole thing was an obvious political ploy and you justifying it and defending it is pathetic. Rules exist to benefit society, when those same rules are used to damage society, must we still obey them? Your whole point is a joke.

          • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            35 months ago

            Not practically, literally. They prosecuted a guy for marijuana under this law, and the only reason they couldn’t get him is they didn’t get evidence of “continued drug use”. That’s why that was so important in Hunter’s trial.

        • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          35 months ago

          The judge straight up rejected the plea deal Hunter and the prosecutor agreed to. They absolutely bowed to political pressure.

    • Ghostalmedia
      link
      fedilink
      English
      65 months ago

      Republicans in Congress are never going to want to limit excessive executive power if it’s only ever used in service of things they like.

    • SeaJ
      link
      fedilink
      10
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      100%

      I’m not super shocked to see people defending this because a chunk of people will always play defense. I’m shocked to see how many are defending this. Nobody should give a shit about Hunter Biden. The attention brought onto him was certainly politically motivated but the trial itself was not. He did the crimes and he should be ready for the consequences. The guy is clearly a grifter.

      I don’t care if Democrats stoop to the level of Republicans when it is actually defending our rights. When it is for blatant nepotism though? Fuck that with a sharp stick.

      Funnily enough, the local satire paper here ran a story right before Thanksgiving with the headline “Turkey Pardoned by President Looks an Awful Lot Like Hunter Biden” with a picture of Hunter in a turkey suit. I think I would actually be more supportive if that had actually happened.

    • @Hadriscus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      55 months ago

      My understanding is that he’s trying to prevent a witch hunt against his son when Trump takes office. I would have done the same thing

    • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      45 months ago

      The pardon power was exactly for this. The entire investigation was a political witch hunt. It’s meant to prevent exactly this kind of mistreatment in the justice system. Just because the person happens to be the president’s son changes nothing except that people will fall into GOP propaganda they’ve been setting up for years, while they push this investigation.