The Alternative for Germany (AfD) has gained ground in three recent state elections, caused an uproar in the Thuringian parliament and triggering another debate on whether to ban the party outright.

  • @hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    77 months ago

    I don’t disagree with that sentiment at all, I’m just not sure how to set this particular broken bone. How do you make ~20% of the population less fascist?

    • @superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      77 months ago

      You can’t, but Germany has always had at least 20% nazis and fascists all throughout its post war history.

      Up till recently, they didn’t vote, or voted conservative, because there was no other option. So they didn’t actually threaten democracy all that much.

      Banning the AfD won’t reduce the number of fascists, but it will close one avenue they have for destroying the state.

      • @hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Did they do it, though? Eg. the BfV (Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution, the domestic intelligence agency) and BKA (Federal Criminal Bureau, the federal investigative police) are somewhat notorious for having a bit of a neo-Nazi problem, and they’re not the only German federal or state entities with the same issue (see eg. this article about the BfV and BKA. Edit: PBS report about neo-Nazi infiltration in German security forces).

        It’s not an uncommon view that denazification wasn’t entirely successful. Hell, they even have a word for the sort of rushed “washing clean” of Nazi officials that was done: Persilschein, “Persil ticket” (Persil is a detergent brand).

        I’d argue that if denazification had really succeeded, the AfD and others like it wouldn’t be as much of an issue.