“We need to identify each juror. Then make them miserable. Maybe even suicidal,” wrote another user on the same forum. “1,000,000 men (armed) need to go to washington and hang everyone. That’s the only solution,” wrote another user. “This s— is out of control.”
“I hope every juror is doxxed and they pay for what they have done,” another user wrote on Trump’s Truth Social platform Thursday. “May God strike them dead. We will on November 5th and they will pay!”
The rhetoric of essentially suggesting someone do a mass killing is not helpful no matter how toxic those fucks are. How can you not see that?
So you’d rather we just ignore them, play nice, and then act all shocked when they start to kill people?
No you idiot. What the fuck is so hard about understanding being as bad as your enemy? I didn’t invent the concept.
deleted by creator
I strongly believe that the correct way to cure a deadly infestation of conservatism is with violence
It is a badge of honor for a psychopath like you to disagree with me.
deleted by creator
I think violence makes itself look weak
deleted by creator
Violence is a last resort. I don’t see how you can be sure of any opinion like this unless you can know the future. Knowing history doesn’t mean you know the future.
“I’m going to kill them before they kill me” is probably not the most ethical way to solve your problems.
You are using ethics as a valid argument about people who tried overthrowing our democracy, are threatening to kill innocent people and are actively pushing for a fascist regime taking over our country. Sure, let’s just sit around, mock them, underestimate them and meme them, that’ll surely stop them.
Okay, so when do you start killing?
My dude is already on a spree. It’s that keyboard warrior to vigilante warrior pipeline.
While I agree with you, I would also argue that you’re not dealing with ethical people. Ethics only works if it’s reciprocal.
Then OP should start their killing spree I guess…
