Programmers can answer all existential questions with ease

    • Except with cloning the other twin would be a different age as with current tech the clone is back to being a baby. You’d need rapid growth tech and mind transfer tech to at least make the clone have the same age, memories and personality, although that would most likely introduce other differences.

      • palordrolap
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        There is at least one case of parents, told at a very early stage that they’re expecting twins, deciding to remove and freeze one of the embryos for later reimplantation, so even with actual identical twins, they can be different ages.

        But yes, transferring minds is not something we can do. I’m not sure it’s something we’ll ever be able to do.

        Should it actually become possible, I assume that certain parties would even advocate for the unique life/lives of the clone(s). The argument would be that the clones’ chance at life shouldn’t be overwritten by other being’s attempts at extension of life.

        “Ethical minefield” doesn’t even begin to cover it!

  • candyman337
    link
    fedilink
    21
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    The real answer btw is no, cloned animals aren’t identical to their original, same base traits, but for example in cows spot position will be different

    Also unless you can copy their memories, they just won’t be the same person.

    And then they’d have two different life experiences and would immediately begin to differ.

      • candyman337
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        They’re now two people who will love two different lives, they will naturally begin to diverge

    • andrew_bidlaw
      link
      fedilink
      62 years ago

      And we also change every milisecond. How long this process takes? It may seem irrelevant but copy of you 5 seconds ago is not you now. It’s your restored back up.

      • @theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        Unless your pause execution of the original or there’s an ongoing synchronization during the cloning process

        • andrew_bidlaw
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          Sync would lag anyway, I think, if we are pedantic.

          Pausing the execution of the original via execution solves the problem of who’s original here tho. One’s still functioning.

          • @theneverfox@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            Well it depends on the method of sync… Doing it through updates would lag, but what if it was through something like quantum effects, or even by treating both bodies and brains like a contiguous organism until the cloning is complete? Like with a cell dividing, there’s no original

  • @Matriks404@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    23
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    They are, on the exact moment they are cloned. On the next attosecond they are not.

    Edit: Well, if they are cloned on the cellular level, otherwise it’s just NO.

      • Can_you_change_your_username
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Environment affects gene expression so cloning below the cellular level (genetic cloning) results in an individual that does not have the same developmental changes caused by environmental factors that the original had. With current technology genetic cloning has been done and cellular cloning is not possible.

  • @jaybone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    29
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    If you just clone a reference to them, then you are just pointing another finger at them.

    Is this really an analogy that resonates with programmers today?

    • Big P
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      If you clone a reference to someone you have a completey separate body but any actions taken affect the original as well

  • _NoName_
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    Imagine if you saw someone who looked exactly like you and mimicked your exact actions, but they were just 3 or 4 feet to the left of you. That’s by reference (I think)

    Contrasting an exact copy of you that can think for itself and has autonomy, which is by value (I think)

    • @derfl007@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      By value could be described as, the exact same as you at the time of cloning, but it will be its own object and in no way connected to your actions.

      Whereas by reference would be exactly what you described

  • @theneverfox@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 years ago

    Huh. Now my confusion about the chicken and the egg debate makes a lot more sense, it seems odd to me that such an easily answered question ended with so much confusion

    I’m now realizing it’s only a debate with non programmers, I thought it was a mutual ADHD communication thing, now I’m realizing maybe it’s just because they learned about inheritance