The use of depleted uranium munitions has been fiercely debated, with opponents like the International Coalition to Ban Uranium Weapons saying there are dangerous health risks from ingesting or inhaling depleted uranium dust, including cancers and birth defects.

  • UlyssesT [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    452 years ago

    Wine cave warrior NAFO ghouls are already doing Adults In The Room armchair calculations about how these death treats will increase chances of a profitable victory for their corporate masters by .03216% and how it’s a heroic sacrifice that disposable Ukrainians must make to defend the land for future profitability.

    maybe-later-honey 🍷 🍷 maybe-later-kiddo

    • flying_monkies
      link
      fedilink
      10
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Depleted utanium is a war crime

      Actually, it’s not. Quoted from the British article about the DU rounds they’re shipping for the Challenger 2s:

      The UK MoD insists that the depleted uranium shells it is sending to Ukraine are not prohibited by any international agreement.

      It says that under Article 36 of the First Protocol of 1977 Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949, the UK’s depleted uranium shells are “capable of being used lawfully in international armed conflict”.

      President Vladimir Putin has warned that if the UK does send depleted uranium shells to Ukraine, “Russia will have to respond accordingly, given that the West collectively is already beginning to use weapons with a nuclear component”.

      The MoD replied in a statement: “The British Army has used depleted uranium in its armour-piercing shells for decades. Russia knows this, but is deliberately trying to disinform.”

      Stating the use of DU is a war crime is just Russian mouthpieces repeating Kremlin lies.

        • flying_monkies
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          While the British don’t know as much about war crimes as the Russians, this time they’re technically correct. Technically correct is the best correct.

            • flying_monkies
              link
              fedilink
              02 years ago

              A tRuE fUnCtIoNaRy - the best a tankie can come up with when a tankie gets called out for their bullshit

              • @slice1@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                -12 years ago

                Yes, nothing wrong with hiding behind some self percieved “correctness” (actshually…) to justify pollution that causes helth issues for generations. But I am so glad you are “technically correct” - how would you sleep otherwise?

  • @zaphod@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    162 years ago

    Seems a little strange considering their refusal to provide M1 Abrams tanks from their stockpile as these have depleted uranium armor.

  • CascadeOfLight [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    352 years ago

    Luckily, the uranium dust is only a problem if the Ukrainian tanks actually get in sight of the Russians.

  • Bloobish [comrade/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    672 years ago

    Ahh wonderful, time for so many future children to be born horribly disfigured via contaminated drinking water. Also don’t forget all the booming cancer rates!

  • Avid Amoeba
    link
    fedilink
    302 years ago

    I’m sure Ukrainian soldiers on the front line are worried about cancer and birth defects.

    • @teddy_m@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      -2
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Everyone should worry. Depleted uranium will contaminate large crop production areas and later these grains will be sold all around the world. Everybody will eat some.

    • @pelikan@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      Yes, Ukrainian soldiers on front line are worried about cancer and birth defects. They are rational human beings who hope to return to their homes and live long lives and grow healthy children, not some subhumans with only intent to kill, kill, kill, as you wish to think.

      • Avid Amoeba
        link
        fedilink
        -3
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I don’t know how rational this is. Given how many soldiers have died so far, if I were a Ukrainian sent to fight on the front line, I wouldn’t expect to be coming back. Rather I’d hope that I contribute to the defeat of the enemy, so that my children or my comrades children don’t grow up under Russian rule. I’m not in their shoes of course. There’s no universal motivation so maybe what you say is more prevalent. That said, this war might not end without soldiers doing a lot more killing so “kill, kill, kill” might be an appropriate viewpoint.

    • flipht
      link
      fedilink
      322 years ago

      It’s not about them. It’s the children who find the spent ammo later.

      This crap is the reason that there are birth defects spikes anywhere the US military operates.

      • Avid Amoeba
        link
        fedilink
        202 years ago

        This makes sense.

        I imagine there’s a lot more reasons for birth defect spikes post US mil ops in addition to this. The military isn’t exactly an environmentally conscious operation. ☠️

        • flipht
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          Sure, burn pits and other crap will help.

          But this kind of ammo, kids will find and hang on to. They bring it home, add it to their collection of other cool shit they’ve scavenged…and then their brothers and sisters are born with malformed limbs, mishaped heads, etc.

          There have been a lot of stories written about it over the years. The one I read was specifically about Iraq I believe, but it was a while ago.

          • @Rowsdower@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            82 years ago

            Proper chunks of depleted uranium are more or less harmless. It’s dangerous if you inhale or ingest large quantities over a long period of time. Not just having it on a shelf

          • JJROKCZ
            link
            fedilink
            62 years ago

            You’re acting like being near this stuff is akin to standing in Chernobyl while it just isn’t true

      • @yetAnotherUser@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        212 years ago

        Is ammo made from lead that much better? I honestly don’t know. Sure the radiation sucks but Uranium, at least the isotope they’re sending is “barely” radioactive. It’s the same Uranium people had in their plates etc. The toxicity is probably the far more relevant factor but I don’t know how Uranium compares to lead.

        • Cethin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          202 years ago

          Depleted uranium is not really that radioactive. Everything is technically radioactive eventually though. Depleted uranium is what’s left behind when you seperate the radioactive stuff out. It’s a heavy metal still, so isn’t good for you, but heavy metals will always be involved. Trying to have a war using only healthy, organic, ethically sourced munitions isn’t going to happen.

      • kitonthenet
        link
        fedilink
        282 years ago

        Ok but the alternatives are not environmentally conscious either, finally the people who’s land it is should be the ones making choices about the conditions of that land

        • @CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          62 years ago

          The alternative bring tungsten? It’s very stable so anything besides eating a spent rod isn’t going to have effects. If it’s in the air it’ll just be inert. Even if it gets in your lungs it’ll be like any other dust. DU on the other hand would keep emitting radiation internally.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
              link
              fedilink
              -12 years ago

              Russia is obviously not going to withdraw, and you or me asking Russia to withdraw isn’t going to make it happen. However, people living in western countries do have at least some influence on their own regimes. Of course, the reason western regimes can keep the proxy war going is precisely because a lot of scumbags are cheering it on right now.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -62 years ago

                  People of Donbas whom the Ukrainian regime was abusing for the past eight years asked Russia for help to defend their lives and home. The atrocities the Ukrainian regime was committing were even covered by CNN in 2014 https://twitter.com/paulius60/status/1611148483859255296

                  Meanwhile, the west is not helping Ukraine, it’s prolonging the war which results in more people dying without changing the outcome. This war could’ve been over last March when Russia and Ukraine almost signed a deal, but UK and US decided to torpedo it. If that’s your idea of helping Ukraine then you need to get your head checked.

          • kitonthenet
            link
            fedilink
            -22 years ago

            The people of Ukraine seem to have a somewhat different view on the matter

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
              link
              fedilink
              42 years ago

              That’s a really convenient narrative based on the fallacy of homogenizing Ukraine. Let’s take a look at a few slides from this lecture that Mearsheimer gave back in 2015 to get a bit of background on the subject. Mearsheimer is certainly not pro Russian in any sense, and a proponent of US global hegemony. First, here’s the demographic breakdown of Ukraine:

              here’s how the election in 2004 went:

              this is the 2010 election:

              As we can clearly see from the voting patterns in both elections, the country is divided exactly across the current line of conflict. Furthermore, a survey conducted in 2015 further shows that there is a sharp division between people of eastern and western Ukraine on which economic bloc they would rather belong to:

              Maybe learn a bit about the subject first.

        • Square Singer
          link
          fedilink
          52 years ago

          But which people? Government or the people who actually own the land?

          And I guess, their favourite choice of “Don’t use any weapons on my land and just clear off voluntairily” is not an option.

          I don’t get why people hate on the Ukraine for using weapons to defend themselves. Not like they chose to be attacked.

      • cooljacob204
        link
        fedilink
        19
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        The amount of Ukrainians dying right now will pale in comparison to those effected by the munitions.

        The controversy around depleted uranium rounds is way overblown.

        Even in Iraq the evidence is super inconclusive. And yes birth defects rose however the entire country basically collapsed for years and nothing clearly indicates it was the DU used.

        Don’t get me wrong, it’s nasty stuff. But this is war, more people are getting killed by bombs then any DU related cancer can cause.

        • In Basra the rate of leukemia in children rose dramatically and that is too specific of a disease to not be linked to DU exposure due to the heavy use of it in surrounding tank battles.

          • @mashbooq@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            22 years ago
            1. correlation ≠ causation. 2) if the disease is caused by DU, is it due to the radioactivity or the fact that DU is a heavy metal?
            • i never said it had to be because of radiation. Even just in its effect as a heavy metal it seems to be much worse. Also it could be that it becomes airborn more easily than other metals such as lead, so the wreckage of tanks shot with DU are more dangerous to the people cleaning them up.

              • @mashbooq@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                -22 years ago

                Why are you so worried about speculated harms when Ukrainians are actually being raped, tortured, and murdered by russians? Your lack of humanity is showing

            • Because the issue is specific to the region and started specifically after the tank battle where DU ammunition was used. If it would be a general issue with some dangerous chemical being used, we’d expect to see similiar issues in other regions. Of course it is hypotheticakky possible that at the same time some dangerous and persistant chemical exposure happened in the region, but that is not plausible and also the US would have a strong interest in finding such an alternative explanation. But there isn’t any research published, that provided an alternative.

              Also look into the wording of the US when sending the ammunition to Ukraine. They state that no radiation hazard is to be expected for the Ukrainians. They do not talk about a toxicological hazard.

  • CombatLiberalism [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    552 years ago

    Every person involved in making this decision deserves to be buried in an unmarked grave with the weapons they love so much. How many innocent people completely uninvolved with the war are going to grow up suffering the effects of depleted uranium rounds? Another absolutely monstrous decision in a long line of monstrous decisions by the US government.

  • @sewerkat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    192 years ago

    The amount of ruscist sympathisers in this thread is depressing. Are depleted uranium munitions fucked up? Yeah and they shouldn’t be used. But that isn’t an excuse to bootlick a fascist invader that is already performing ethnic cleansing on territories they took last year

  • Big Miku
    link
    fedilink
    English
    102 years ago

    From what I’ve read depleted uranium is not proven to cause cancer, nor is it not proven (With the exception that you inhale it or eat it).

    In Iraq it’s still up to debate if it causes cancer or birth defects, since burning buildings and other burning stuff also causes a lot of nasty things to humans.

    From what I’ve read they were also used in Bosnia, and they haven’t had similiar effects to Iraq.

    So let the Ukrainians have their depleted uranium.

  • @gnuhaut@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    332 years ago

    Why though? Can’t imagine that these rounds are going to change the course of the war, so why? Are they out of non-Uranium ones?

    • R0cket_M00se
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      Russian forced are mechanized and entrenched, depleted uranium self sharpens on impact, yielding far better armor penetration than previous technologies.

    • No individual measure aside from troops on the ground or nukes is going to change the course of the war by itself.

      The ammunition is very effective at punching through the armor. But the Ukrainians will be fucked when in 5 years Leukemia in children is skyrocketing

        • Duży Szef [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 years ago

          So what, you’re suggesting that right now they are “winning”? By what metric are they “winning”? Western brownie points? Because all of the teenagers and young adults that are 6ft under would beg to differ.

    • @letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      272 years ago

      They are harder and penetrate armour better. So yes they will provide an advantage.

      The sooner Russian occupiers are no longer murdering Ukrainians and dropping mines over every square meter of land, the less harm comes to Ukrainians.

    • Clarke
      link
      fedilink
      292 years ago

      Because of the uranium bullets are denser and heavier than the lead bullets and you can use the uranium bullets on certain types of aircraft and other weapons systems to shred through medium to heavy armor that could not be penetrated with a lead bullet. TLDR this will be used as a force multiplier.

        • CombatLiberalism [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          682 years ago

          Imagine being this bloodthirsty you’re willing to let Ukrainians suffer the effects of depleted uranium just to kill more Russians

          • flying_monkies
            link
            fedilink
            -4
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Imagine defending a regime that targets hospitals and schools for missile attacks and rains white phosphorous down on cities.

            If the Russians cared about anything beyond their own expansionist agenda, they’d retreat and end the war they started. If you actually cared about the suffering of Ukrainians, you would stop being a mouthpiece for that regime.

            • Duży Szef [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              52 years ago

              Fuck, I almost thought you were on about the US and Israel but guess not ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

              Too bad you still are pushing for the war to even continue. You don’t want the Russians to genocide every single Ukrainian so you still propose they should just do it themselves and continue running straight into landmines. 🙄

              How about some peace talks? Maybe? Oh wait Boris Johnson thought otherwise

          • @letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            112 years ago

            “let” Ukrainians.

            Your patronising colonial mask is slipping.

            Ukrainians have ASKED for these weapons so they can get rid of the murderous, child torturing Russians out of their country.

            Stop amplifying the propaganda of child torturers.

  • @MonkCanatella@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    44
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    OP is known tankie just fyi. Doesn’t justify US or Ukrainian actions but make sure you understand that the reason for posting this isn’t out of any actual concern for human beings. They’re also peddling covid conspiracies

    • ThisMachineKillsFascists [he/him, she/her]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      So let me get this straight, according to you:

      The people that don’t support either side of the war and want to end it as fast as possible through peace talks are evil tankies.

      And the bloodthirsty monsters that want to prolong a pointless war, arm Azov Nazis and kill as many people as possible with illegal inhumane weapons that scar generations are freedom-loving liberals.

      Seems like the tankies are the more reasonable ones in this situation.

      • @blackn1ght@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        want to end it as fast as possible through peace talks are evil tankies.

        Surrender == the end of Ukraine. There’s 0% chance of Russia honouring it for any meaningful length of time. They’ll see it as a weakness of Ukraine and they’ll just build up their forces again and attack. Any legitimate peace deal HAS to have the condition of Russia pulling out of all Ukrainian territory otherwise it’ll completely legitimise nations to start wars to take land for themselves. Russia loses nothing by withdrawing. And you 100% know this, which is why tankies keep peddling it - they can claim to be on the moral high ground by saying “we want peace! everyone else are bloodthirsty monsters!” but in reality they know it’ll just lead to more violence and genocide. Imagine calling the Allies blood thirsty monsters in WWII because they didn’t accept a peace deal with Nazi Germany because they wanted it to end as fast as possible.

        Nobody wants bloodshed. Ukraine didn’t ask for this war. But they’re not going to give up and let Russia get away with a land grab.

        Seems like the tankies are the more reasonable ones in this situation.

        If by reasonable that you want Russia to win this war then yeah, sure.

        • @gnuhaut@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          82 years ago

          otherwise it’ll completely legitimise nations to start wars to take land for themselves

          Have you been sleeping for the last decades? There were plenty of wars. The US didn’t stop them, in fact, the US started a bunch of them, and more were started by US allies, or waged with US help. The US supports illegal occupation (“taking land”) all over, too.

          So is there actually any norm anyone adheres to? Seems to me the actual norm is “don’t do anything the US doesn’t like”. It’s got nothing to do with starting wars or taking land.

          • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            otherwise it’ll completely legitimise nations to start wars to take land for themselves

            no one tell this guy what a nation is it’ll break his heart

        • ThisMachineKillsFascists [he/him, she/her]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          This isn’t a children’s movie, there is no good guy in this war.

          No one fucking wins, if Azov ‘wins’ then Ukraine will become even more of a Nazi shithole and a husk of an economy as the US calls in all its debts. If Russia ‘wins’ then it won’t be much better off either.

          Nobody wants bloodshed. Ukraine didn’t ask for this war.

          Than advocate for peace talks instead of grinding more Ukrainians and Russians into paste, you bloodthirsty ghoul.

          But they’re not going to give up and let Russia get away with a land grab.

          See? You do want bloodshed. You care more about dirt than human life.

          There are only two outcomes of this war: A bloody long battle where innocent people get thrown in the meatgrinder regardless of which side comes out on top, or we get both sides to stop fighting and do peace talks so they can compromise and stop the killing as soon as possible. Nothing good will ever come out of this war. It needs to end as soon as possible to stop the bloodshed. The concern here should be stopping the loss of life as soon as possible, not caring about lines on a fucking map. For supposedly being pro-Ukraine, NATO sure loves killing Ukrainians.

        • If we’re supporting capitalist Russia the same way NATO tools are supporting Nazi Ukraine then where are our comments saying we should send money and weapons to Russia to defeat the Ukrainian ‘orcs’, then? Show me where these pro-Russia comments are, I’ll wait.

          Get real, none of us have said anything in support of modern capitalist Russia. We’re communists ffs, would we really support the thing that killed the Soviet Union? Use your head.

          Next, you’ll tell me that people against the war on terror in the Middle East were on the side of the Taliban.

      • @severien@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        Something like Stalinist communists. Usually used for non-Russians, but for some reason they love Russian imperialism.

      • @Kittenstix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        That’s a pretty bad faith take, they’re just pointing out that op has an agenda as to why they are linking this specific article.

        • mycorrhiza they/them
          link
          fedilink
          02 years ago

          op has an agenda as to why they are linking this specific article

          everyone has a fucking perspective, that’s a normal human behavior. do you expect people to just randomly select articles to post?

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    162 years ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The rounds, which could help destroy Russian tanks, are part of a new military aid package for Ukraine set to be unveiled in the next week.

    The munitions can be fired from U.S. Abrams tanks that, according to a person familiar with the matter, are expected be delivered to Ukraine in the coming weeks.

    It follows an earlier decision by the Biden administration to provide cluster munitions to Ukraine, despite concerns over the dangers such weapons pose to civilians.

    The United States used depleted uranium munitions in massive quantities in the 1990 and 2003 Gulf Wars and the NATO bombing of former Yugoslavia in 1999.

    The U.N. nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, says that studies in former Yugoslavia, Kuwait, Iraq and Lebanon “indicated that the existence of depleted uranium residues dispersed in the environment does not pose a radiological hazard to the population of the affected regions.”

    Parts of the country are already strewn with unexploded ordnance from cluster bombs and other munitions and hundreds of thousands of anti-personnel mines.


    The original article contains 499 words, the summary contains 172 words. Saved 66%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    272 years ago

    Yet more confirmation that the West regards Ukrainians as subhuman, and that they know they’re not getting the territory back. Generations of birth defects, the unexploded bombs that cluster bombs leave behind, more and more people being drafted and shoved into a meat grinder in a war that’s already lost, just so some American ghouls can make a bit of extra cash off their Raytheon stocks.

    None of this was worth it. But it’s going to keep happening. The US will keep arming Nazis and pushing war over diplomacy and destabilizing everything until something is done to get rid of those bastard war profiteers and the ghouls who lied us into Iraq and Afghanistan.

    This shit’s so fucking stupid. Can’t wait for the chickenhawks to call me a bad person while sitting behind their keyboards demanding others be forced to fight in their stead.

  • @Stuka@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    7
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Tankies shaking in their boots over that Abrams 120mm DU APFSDS slicing though Russian steel like butter.

    It’s so easy to trigger tankie bridgades. How many posts yall got about me now? Tagged me in a few!