Summary

The EU plans to fine Elon Musk’s X over $1 billion for violating the Digital Services Act by failing to control disinformation and illicit content.

This would mark the first major penalty under the new law and could trigger a legal clash with Musk, who vowed to fight in court.

Regulators say the fine aims to deter other platforms. Tensions with the U.S. are rising, as X also faces a broader investigation.

  • @etuomaala@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    A billion dollars in fines might make twitter unprofitable. In a regular company, that would coerce the owners to make changes. But Musk doesn’t own twitter because he wants to make money off of it, at least not directly. What Musk uses it for is control. A billion dollars a year in fines will be worth it to him, as long as it gives him more control.

    The only way to deny him this undue influence is to ban it outright or fine him a lot more.

      • aname
        link
        fedilink
        English
        404 days ago

        At least they have the balls to impose 1 billion euro penalties.

        • @jumjummy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          254 days ago

          “Plans to” has as much value as “slams” when it comes to real world impact. I’d love to be proven wrong and have the new title become “actually fines”, but I have my doubts.

          • @Rythm@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            54 days ago

            With the current (digital) regulatory landscape (e.g. GDPR, DMA, DSA and the AI Act that is entering into force in multiple stages right now), the EU has proven to be quite resolute and decisive with their fines and measures. This is all partof their digital de ade stategy and more legislation is coming to tame these tech behemoths. Yes, it isn’t always fast or efficiënt, but the EU seems to be only world power that actually has the balls to do something.

            This reminds me of EDPB Guidelines that have been published last year. In it, the EDPB had said that in extreme cases, AI models that have been trained on unlawfully obtained data such as personal data without a ground of proxessing etc., nationale authorites may compel the violating developer to delete the whole model. I do not see it happening soon or often, but it is a very good sign that the European authority mentions this as a possible action and outcome in an official document.

          • @Eril@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            94 days ago

            I’m optimistic that it will happen eventually. The EU generally is moving with stuff like this, even though it is slow as fuck. But well, let’s see, not promising anything…

          • "no" banana
            link
            fedilink
            English
            34 days ago

            The difference is that the judicial branch needs to be thorough and build a case. Planning to is all they can do until they actually do.

            If Shitter is found to do something illegal that should land them a fine that is what will happen.

        • @Ofiuco@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          174 days ago

          Up to 1 billion, it will be less than that and it will be dragged out as long as possible… And still it isn’t as beneficial as plain blocking the nazi websites.

      • @samus12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        154 days ago

        Sadly, you’re right. Although if the the extreme aggression coming from the US government continues, they might actually get prodded into doing something about it eventually.

  • @Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    864 days ago

    up to $1 billion

    It will be much less than a billion.

    If a fine can be paid without causing financial strain, then it just becomes part of the cost of doing business.

    If you want results, fine him $100 billion.

    • @RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      “Worth” only according to its owner, who paid himself to buy it from himself under a different org. Good luck finding an outside investor willing to spend $30B on it now that it’s turned into a hate pool with a shit revenue stream

      • @Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        134 days ago

        The last people to evaluate the company under the rules of fiduciary responsibility put the value at $10 billion.

        Musk gets away with this because people believe his Ponzi schemes will make them rich. In a first world country he would be in prision for fraud.

      • @hddsx@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        54 days ago

        That’s not the point. That’s the value at which the deal was made. Fine him more.

    • @Kimmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 days ago

      At this point in time absolutely. Plus a good old tar n feather session wouldn’t hurt

  • Lit
    link
    fedilink
    English
    20
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Make it $10 billion. $1 billion is nothing to Elon Musk and X. Fine his Tesla swasticars company too for something.

    • @Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53 days ago

      Block his sites Europe-wide at the ISP level. Make Google and Apple block his apps from the European app stores.

      Hit him where it’ll really upset him.