• NoiseColor
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21216 days ago

    Bizzare. Americans are seriously crazy. It’s a monarchy really, it’s so in your face, like a bad comedy.

    • @Ilandar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1916 days ago

      It’s a monarchy really

      Yes, this is actually a much more helpful way to think about Trump’s approach to presidency. Here is Dr David Smith from the United States Studies Centre explaining this in a recent episode of PEP (excellent in-depth American politics podcast from Australia).

    • @InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      No, it’s just that the south hates everything about the rest of America, and have done since we took their slaves away

      They support anything that hurts everyone else, or as they call it: ‘Owning the libs’.

    • @RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3216 days ago

      Start the campaign now for President in 2256. Wouldn’t want the judges to look politically biased, they’ll have to hold off on sentencing until after the election.

    • @Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3816 days ago

      You know they’ll disqualify anyone who might even hint at knowledge of jury nullification from the jury pool. They’ll be selected on their ability to convict solely.

        • @DaleGribble88@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -7
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          Now you’re asking them to commit perjury - which is also bad. (In case anyone reads this and decides to try their best poker face)

          • @Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1116 days ago

            Now you’re asking them to commit perjury - which is also bad.

            Only if they get caught and punished for it. Laws exist to discourage bad behavior, which lying in service of justice isn’t, so in this case breaking the law is the morally correct thing to do.

            Like shooting a billionaire or the CEO of a predatory corporation.

            • @DaleGribble88@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              015 days ago

              Sure, whatever, but lying under oath during the jury selection process is a crime called perjury. Morale correctness aside, I’m just trying to keep folks out of jail my dude.

          • @null@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            716 days ago

            Now your asking them to commit perjury

            Only if they specifically ask “do you know about jury nullification?”

            • @DaleGribble88@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              316 days ago

              No, they usually ask something like “Do you have any personal beliefs that would prevent you from returning a guilty verdict involved with this type of crime?” - seriously yall, this shit isn’t hard to look up and is usually posted right alongside explanations for what jury nullification is. Frankly, I doubt anyone reading this is rich enough to pull the “you didn’t specifically ask about jury nullification therefore I technically did not commit perjury”-card.

              • @null@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                315 days ago

                Well at least now I know it’s effectively illegal for me to be on a jury for the rest of my life. So that’s cool.

            • @DaleGribble88@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              114 days ago

              No, you swear an oath to answer honestly during the jury selection process. The lawyers will ask if you have any moral or ethical concerns that would prevent you from convicting the accused - ie you would be willing to engage in jury nullification. If you say no, but you actually do intend to nullify, then you lied under oath and could be found guilty of perjury at that point.

    • @Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12116 days ago

      Obligatory, I do not condone violence per lemmys rules, or whatever.

      Agreed. This might be the only method to save us. Rule of law doesn’t work, we are owned by the billionaire class. Bring out the guillotines for these bootlickers. Might be the only way we get free.

      Free Luigi.

      Fuck this aryan Pam bondi cunt and these prosecutors.

      • @CallateCoyote@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3816 days ago

        Oh, we’re not supposed to condone violence against monsters who hurt others for greed here either? Well, dang. What if I do though?

          • @CallateCoyote@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16
            edit-2
            16 days ago

            Works for me. I’m over wasting my time on platforms where I’m not allowed to praise the great man Luigi for his wonderful deeds and wish for more like them. Because that’s how I honestly feel and I won’t apologize for it! I can’t hide who I am anymore.

            Edit: whoops. Wrong thread but same idea. Hah.

          • @CallateCoyote@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            315 days ago

            This should like… just not be a rule though. Why can’t we wish for violence against evil people? Who is coming after the Lemmy instances if users wish for violence against evil people? It’s not like we’re actively organizing simply by saying we like imagining healthcare CEOs having their brains removed via bullet. And boy how do I!

      • @henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2016 days ago

        Technically it’s not a rule of Lemmy but the instance rules that forbid this.

        We are indeed owned by the billionaire class. It’s their country. We live in it.

      • @VanillaFrosty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        44
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        I’m still waiting for people to get mad enough to use drones for political violence. Like shit, Ukraine can make an effective FPV for like 50 USD from what I’ve seen

        Imagine if Luigi dropped a grenade on this dude while just sitting in Central Park.

        It’s gonna be a good time.

        • @Jordan117@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1816 days ago

          Drone warfare is politically agnostic. If it can be used by a Luigi against a healthcare CEO, it can be used by far-right extremists against progressive politicians, pride parades, or Black churches. I’m not very jazzed to live in the world of Slaughterbots.

          • @med@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1216 days ago

            Not to mention, the minute it happens, the government will carpet the skies with observation drones in the name of safety

            • @VanillaFrosty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              216 days ago

              Maybe, but honestly there isn’t too much a need for them to thanks to the existence of things like TLO. Maybe for surveillance over less developed areas?

              Idk I’m not happy about any of this but it’s interesting to speculate what a modern day cyberpunk is going to look like.

              • @med@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                214 days ago

                That’s fair, there’s other angles of observation made available already.

                Seeing as you like speculating about cyberpunk, how about if observation is just the initial way to way to sell the drone cloud? Depending on how cheap you can make them, there’s an argument to made for reducing time-to-intercept for low-speed aerial objects.

                If you’ve got a bunch of drones overhead already, you could run one in to the path of a kamikaze drone, or if your swarm is even lightly armed, you can extend engagement range and reduce required accuracy with a single buckshot shell to shoot an offending drone down.

                If you’re content to prioritize executive safety over public saftey, there’s a lot that can be done.

                Drone displays terrify me.

                • @VanillaFrosty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  214 days ago

                  How about if observation is just the initial way to way to sell the drone cloud? Depending on how cheap you can make them, there’s an argument to made for reducing time-to-intercept for low-speed aerial objects. If you’re content to prioritize executive safety over public saftey, there’s a lot that can be done.

                  This isn’t something I’ve ever considered, I hate it! 🤣 Essentially a light weight, personal, iron dome. Considering the great lengths Putin goes through to protect himself from his own military, I could see the mango and friends doing this.

                  Hell imagine if they made the drone cloud then took Israel’s “Gospel”, slapped that into them and create a full blown Big brother. Sure it just recommends targets now, but with more training from two fascist states it could become something much worse.

                  I hate this timeline.

          • @VanillaFrosty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4
            edit-2
            16 days ago

            I feel with that interpretation, any weapon is politically agnostic. Which I’d agree with given the use of firearms by far right extremists to shoot up Walmarts, clubs, and churches. They’ve already been using weapons against their “adversaries” like the domestic terrorists they are.

            But agreed, I’m not actually excited about it. The premise is horrifying. I do hope the good guys pull the trigger first on this one. It’s, in my opinion, the logical next step.

        • @jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2516 days ago

          I kind of hope that will have the bonus effect of making the ownership class ease up on return-to-office. Sure, have your executive meeting in-person. Oh shit, someone flew a drone in and it exploded, shooting nails everywhere and killing half the c-suite? Shit. Anyway. We’ll be working from home until at least they clear the blood out of the carpets.

          (Though realistically, they’d make workers go in physically while being remote themselves. But maybe someone will bomb their house. No mercy for the ultra-rich.)

      • MochiGoesMeow
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -316 days ago

        Evidently this researcher found that peaceful resistance movements have been more successful in bringing democratic governments in their nations against tyranny than violent ones that usually instilled more extreme governments.

        https://youtu.be/YJSehRlU34w

  • @Gates9@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    There’s a guy who killed 23 people in a Walmart in El Passo in 2022. Got charged with hate crimes on account of…he’s openly racist and said that’s why he did it.

    That guy just got a plea deal to avoid the death penalty.

    Nobody should identify the criminal justice system in America as anything else but a mechanism for protecting the rich.

  • Tomtits
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2016 days ago

    Even if the actual killer stuck again, hitting another CEO and then confessed on live TV for both murders, people would still think (and I can say the name here) that Luigi is guilty.

    Y’all are mental across the pond

      • @wolfinthewoods@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1016 days ago

        Wow. There’s a huge disparity between the brows on those two. No matter how blurry the first pics are, the thickness of Luigi’s brows would be noticeable. The person in that camera footage definitely doesn’t have thick eyebrows like Luigi :/

        • @lumony@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          115 days ago

          I agree with this assessment.

          I cannot convict because I do not believe this person is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

          • @Ilandar@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            115 days ago

            Ah yes, the “different nose” which is mostly obscured in the top photos and has a giant red circle covering it in the bottom photo.

              • @Ilandar@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                015 days ago

                Ah, so the monobrow photo is after the security cam photos. How interesting that you tried to avoid telling me this the first time around.

  • @Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6416 days ago

    This administration is too stupid to realize they’re sitting on a powder keg? By all means light the match……let’s see what happens

    • @PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      My current tinfoil-hat conspiracy theory is that’s exactly what they’re banking on. They’ll draw the trial out until right before the midterm election… Then Trump will use the resulting riots to declare martial law and cancel the upcoming midterms, so he doesn’t lose control of congress. After he has cancelled the election, he’ll make a final push to clean house, and will start ousting liberal congress members by accusing them of being riot conspirators.

      The Mangione Riots will be Trump’s Reichstag Fire.

    • @lumony@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      815 days ago

      Incels should honestly be targeting country clubs instead of elementary schools.

      The ruling class plays a much bigger role in why they’re incels than school students do.

      • @Formfiller@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        114 days ago

        They’re not smart people. This would require the ability to critically think and reason with facts. They’re brainwashed by the billionaire backed right wing propaganda machine. Women/brown people=bad. Billionaires/White Men =good

  • FundMECFS
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1716 days ago

    The state wants to keep its monopoly on violence.

  • @Ksin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5316 days ago

    That’s seems pretty damn ballsy of them since unless they are extremely confident in the jury selection it’s practically guaranteed to result in a hung jury if they know that finding him guilty will result in the most severe verdict.

    • @SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2916 days ago

      Yeah there’s no better reason to use jury nullification than when government wants to kill a guy for political reasons.

    • @InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      716 days ago

      Federal juries are way, way easier to tilt towards the prosecution, and the judge has far more power, even assuming he isn’t a Trump appointee.