The Portuguese Air Force is no longer expected to acquire the 5th generation F-35 fighter from Lockheed Martin, all due to the review of the US position towards NATO.

  • @Gsus4@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    271 month ago

    Yea, imagine getting a brand-new fleet of F-35s and then king trump wakes up and has them bricked to blitz-annex the Azores.

  • Teknikal
    link
    fedilink
    English
    161 month ago

    Have to be honest I’m not keen on the UK buying any more either I’d rather see Rafales on the new carriers or a tweaked eurofighter.

      • Teknikal
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 month ago

        Don’t think that will happen with the Tempest program being the main focus for the raf but if they could make a carrier capable tranche version it could be a good stopgap.

  • @perestroika@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    It’s migration season, and this is only the first bird - I predict there’s more of them.

    I think we have an interesting conflict of interest on the US side of the ocean: “the US military industrial complex” vs. “Trump, driving away their customers”.

    • @takeda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 month ago

      For them it is easier, because as I understand they didn’t sign any contract yet, just were planning to.

  • @muddyuk@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    491 month ago

    Why would anybody feel they can rely on American hardware anymore? Any country with any sense won’t be beholden to them as an ally now thanks to that idiotic mango.

      • @mayumu@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        261 month ago

        I’m assuming because American arms dealers like Lockheed Martin are losing a ton of business and America is rapidly losing the soft power and influence its build over the past 80 years

          • KillingTimeItself
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 month ago

            because that’s the entire crux of NATO, the post war world, and most of the military stability that currently exists throughout the western world, and beyond.

            Who knows what happens after this point.

            • @IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -3
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              You mean how NATO destroyed Asia, Africa and the Middle East and is making masses of refugee streams emigrate? Very stable indeed.

              NATO is the worlds largest terror organisation by a long shot. You deny their crimes committed in broad daylight because you have not been a victim of them.

              What is next, The Empire did nothing wrong?

              • KillingTimeItself
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 month ago

                NATO destroyed asia? Aside from vietnam, which im not sure is in asia off the top of my head, which was also a war the US was personally involved in, im not sure what influence NATO has had outside of NATO member states. You know, the ones that actually matter.

            • @CherryBullets@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 month ago

              WWIII ofc, it’s inevitable if NATO falls. Who knows how it will play out, but it will play out if that comes to pass.

    • Denixen
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Uses a license produced engine from US (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volvo_RM12), which has caused endless problems in exports for SAAB, since the US blocks them frequently when they are about to win a contract.

      I would go for Rafale or Eurofighter and I am saying this as a swede. We need to replace the engines ASAP. Perhaps a UK, German or French one. Would probably take years to develop thought and likely a significant overhaul will be necessary.

      • @ubergeek@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 month ago

        Well, an easier fix is to just keep using the engine design, and stop paying the license fees.

        What is the US gonna do? Stop supporting NATO? Put tariffs on exports to the EU? Stop being an ally, and ally themselves with Russia?

        • KillingTimeItself
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 month ago

          presumably NATO could group up, and vote to kick a country out of NATO, i assume this would be one of those cases, if they really caused trouble.

            • @prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              4
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Sure.

              The USA is like 60% of NATO forces.

              So this would more likely lead to the dissolution of NATO.

              The point I was making is that the adults in the room would probably prefer to not kick the hornets nest despite preparing for the worst if the hornets nest kicks off.

              • @ubergeek@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 month ago

                The hornet nest is already kicked up… And the US is 60% of NATO right NOW. Which means Europe needs to bolster themselves. And its easier to do that without handing over half a billion bucks for nothing.

                Just ignore it. Trump ignores contracts all the time. At worst? He’d just put more tariffs on the EU, because he knows not a single general will launch a war in Europe.

  • Tuukka R
    link
    fedilink
    English
    491 month ago

    Portugal was lucky to get quite late aboard the F35 ship, as they decided about it as late as April 2024. Finland, where I’m from, was one of the earliest ones, deciding about the procurement in late 2022. Some other ones, as told by Wikipedia:

    Canada: Jan 2023 Czechia: Jan 2024 Germany: 2023 Greece: Delivery 2027, so ordered probably in late 2023 or so? Poland: 2020, apparently some already delivered? Romania: November 2024 Singapore: Early 2024 Switzerland: delivery from 2027, so probably ordered in late 2023?

    The further the procurement process, the more money might get wasted if the order has to be cancelled. Would still make sense to cancel, though, because a weapon you are free to use as long as there is no war is just a heap of scrap metal. It does not matter how much money we’ve already spent on the scrap metal, we should not put a cent more.

  • @Lootboblin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 month ago

    When Finland chose their new 64 F-35s. I supported it. Not anymore. We should have chosen our west neighbour’s Saabs.

  • @Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Bravo to Portugal!!! Setting a solid example of what the rest of 1st Class Europe should do with US weapon contracts. The current US political situation is playing a dangerous game with the US MIC.

  • @AidsKitty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -191 month ago

    It will be good for the USA to not be responsible for 70% of the NATO defense budget. We can close many military bases throughout Europe and pivot to Asia and form new alliances.